would still get restricted because they’re contentious. Like if you start talking about how you believe in equal rights, that’s something most people agree with (at least in principle,) and it shouldn’t be political. But it’s going to ruffle some feathers anyways (especially if you get any more specific than that,) so it’d be restricted.

If this is the best example you can come up with, it is fairly unconvincing that any mainstream political will be restricted.

Fast-travel

Essentially the goal is this: to use a giant electromagnetic launch track to accelerate a hypersonic aircraft to Mach 1.6. The aircraft would then separate from the track, ignite its engine and enter near space at seven times the speed of sound.

Does no one read the article anymore before commenting? I’m not responding to all the comments here since it’s clearly a waste of my time, but every single one of the concerns that people mention in this thread so far has been acknowledged in the article already.

Works for me

Now think about how many “birds” you’ve seen that were walking or resting instead of flying. The system takes cost-effectiveness into consideration.

I agree. Homophobia, ableism, transphobia, and body shaming against republicans and dictators are fine.

Shame on anyone who dares use such discriminatory language against liberals. You should know better than that, bigot.

South Korea is a giant late stage capitalism so it makes perfect sense.

I know right? It’s amazing what proper governmental response and civic mindedness of the populace can do.

See also: Vietnam, Korea, New Zealand