![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
JavaOS
JavaOS
No 16 gigs is ok for an LLM
On your gpu
I’ve developed “AI” using prolog.
No machine learning, you’re still solving problems using logical reasoning and deduction that’s not intuitively obvious for humans.
I wrote an ai that classifies spam emails with 99.9% accuracy.
Our test set contained 1000 emails, 999 aren’t spam.
The algorithm:
Machine learning isn’t the only form of AI.
Epic games is retarded.
I bought rdr when it releases in PC there, and oh wonder the pic port wasn’t good at the beginning.
Tried to get it to run for the hours, including the launcher update and stuff like that.
No luck, and no refund because I “played” for now than two hours…
So if I use your toothbrush to clean my asshole it’s fine cuz it’s still there right?
As a math PhD you should come to the conclusion that both are enumerable and this is why they are the same.
Y=x
And
Y=e^x
With lim x->(I don’t know how to type it here)
are not the same but both unbounded.
Nah, automatic are common.
The reasoning is, if you know how to drive manual you also know how to drive automatic, but not vice versa.
From what I understand you obfuscate the port in order to limit the amount of incoming attacks. But then fail2ban would be a much more effective tool.
The disinterested aspect you described is the actual problem. Because it’s based on the assumption your port won’t be found, but it definitely will, and as soon as that happens you’ll end up in a database such as shodan and the entire effect is GONE.
Obfuscation is not security, changing the port doesn’t increase your security
I wouldn’t be overly harsh.
Some logos/images/designs are simply hardwired to the function that they can’t remember where the apps are if the logo changes. I’m pretty sure I’ll be the same if I use something for 30 years.
Asking logical questions in a thread about a conspiracy theory? We don’t do that here.
I mean, the analogy doesn’t even work.
Just because I can only rent a car and not buy it, doesn’t mean it would be fine to smash the window and steal it instead.
So you can see 17% oxygen
Well especially if the previous comment asked “or am I missing something”.
Obviously I could be wrong that’s why I said I THINK
You’re just going to shift goalposts every time I’ll post something.
Not recent enough. Not enough cases. That’s different.
And lastly you’ll just claim I do it because I’m an arch maximalist, despite not knowing anything about me :)
Exactly, why would they even put napkins out if the customers still come.
Yeah you’re missing the point that the mind blown is just ironic.
The entire point here was to demonstrate that the “security” features of these DEs are not implemented by the DE but by the underlying components such as PAM, and you can just ignore the DE until you have the basics fixed.
What’s the point in having a super duper secure login screen if I can bypass it by booting from a USB stick for example.
I mean, you can simply define something differently than the last 50 years of researchers in computer science. It’s just not going to make a difference.