
can we only test in on men too?

can we only test in on men too?

exactly, where else has the thrill of risk with the safety of probably not getting caught?

would the tax be based on the number of livable units in the home?

it isn’t particularly slow if you have enough RAM and it has indexed the project

companies shouldn’t have limits on how far they can grow, and vertical integration is almost impossible to regulate as it’s just manufacturing a product from start to finish.

it is simply preventing laws from banning a modern bulletin board billboard hybrid tech that teenagers use because it would restrict access to bulletin boards for adults and minors.

it would work pretty well after a few years, just ignore the deaths during the roll out.

sawdust is edible though, now digestable is a different question entirely and will require a few centuries of research to get data on due to my pro-sawdust-in-food lobbyists.

yes, however as far as I am aware there are no laws in the us against any private vehicle usage on private land. Unlike the FDA which criminalizes owning or consuming certain chemicals.

time to make a recipe website that hides the recipe in JavaScript, but leaves the story in HTML.

finally, a map with Alaska and its diverse and strong opinions

similarly looking for sip companies, specifically with less discrimination against the 49th state.

but it will make them less celabete

fair, but I am going to try and get a pinephone soon anyway ¯\(ツ)/¯

it may be cheaper, but I fucking hate data caps.

join the pepper jack side

wo needs loved ones when you have money?

conveniently my phone’s last update was 11 (god I wish there were more security updates past 11 2023)

rural ISPs still need a connection to the greater internet, what options are there when the closest non-shitty option is hundreds of miles away?
It’s the same concept as car dealerships having loans and being owned (or franchise things) by the car company.