• kielimieli@r-sauna.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I wish I could eat like this - not only for the cost effectiveness, but it’d be better for the environment than meat! Having IBD really sucks. I can only imagine how difficult it is in the US where the medical care is so expensive on top of everything else.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Ducks are delicious and eat the way you describe. If I eat ducks I’m eating those things once removed and enjoying it, too.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Hey man if you have a legal place to hunt, go wild!

      Buying anything but the cheapest of meats these days is eye watering.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Only slightly related. One weird thing I noticed when moving to Japan is that peanuts and beans were way more expensive than the US. I guess the equivalent here would be moyashi (bean sprouts) and cabbage.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Interesting! What is considered the cheap source of proteins over there? Is it just soy?

      • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        soy (in the form of edamame, tofu, and natto) is probably the cheapest option. Eggs are usually next on the list for people over here.

        Edit: seafood might or might not be an option before eggs depending upon where one lives. Organ meat as well as we eat heart, liver, etc. a lot here as well.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be clear, if you’re at all concerned about maintaining a food budget, even if it’s $500/week the billionaire class is still your enemy.

          • ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s just a class that is absolutely exploring people. You can’t become a billionaire without it. You can absolutely become an honest millionaire so it wouldn’t make sense to use that.

            • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah like there are folks who are worth 10ish million who just bought a house 50ish years ago that gained a lot of value and had dual incomes that saved all their money for retirement.

              100 million folks are on THIN ice, but there is probably an author or inventor out there who made something really nice and everyone they worked with was also well taken care of. Most of them are probably garbage, but not all of them have to be. Some famous actors also were well known for making sure everyone got paid what they deserved on set and were very generous.

              I just don’t see getting to a billion without someone being taken advantage of on the way though.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Lack of understanding of class. Billionaires are just the obscene top of the top of the bourgeoisie and they do excercise disproportional power in the ruling class, but the class war isn’t only about them, it’s about the system which makes their power possible. For example China also have billionaires, but they aren’t even 1/100 of a problem there.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Any billionaire can lose 90% of their wealth and have above 100 million left.

          Many can lose 99% and have above 100 million left.

          Some can lose 99% and still be billionaires.

          The 100 millionaire will still have a million or more left after losing 99%, but that’s not “live like hogs in the fat house forever” money at least. It’s just “I don’t have to worry if I lose my job” money.

          A hundredbillionaire can lose 99% of their money and not make any perceptible changes in their lifestyle.

          I propose the following:

          Gap individual wealth at 50000x the national median annual income. Max wealth anyone in the US could have is, at present, under 2 billion. Other countries will vary, but generally it’s plenty enough to motivate people to innovate, but nobody gets to be Bezos or Musk wealthy. Yachts should count towards this wealth gap, at a depreciation rate of 5% a year off the build cost. Primary residence doesn’t count unless it’s also used for generating income. You get to have one car, regardless of price, that doesn’t get counted towards it, and the other ones count at market value. So you can have your classic car that appreciates in price, and a daily driver - without having to worry about the classic car’s effect on your wealth limit.

          Side effect is that now suddenly rich people near the gap will be a lot more interested in paying better wages to the working class. Why? Because then they’d get to keep more of their money. And to raise the median efficiently, you need to be raising wages for the poorest among us first and foremost.

          • Melody Fwygon@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            In general; I think even 2 billion is too much. Nobody needs that much money.

            At best; I think no one should be able to have more than about 500 Million. You get one house, and one car for each adult family member if you’re married with non-adult kids. Adult kids don’t add uncounted vehicles; they have their own limit. Anything that is seaworthy or airworthy counts as about as much “Wealth” as you initially spent on it minus a reasonable depreciation rate yearly as determined by the market, so no buying a thing and having it lose 30% of it’s value the moment you drive it off the lot after buying it.

            Additionally; to block too many shenanigans; wealth added by any property that is bought sticks; 3 years at minimum. This prevents people from storing too much excess in property and shell-gaming it. A company you own or have stake in cannot lend (in a long term) or gift you property in excess of 1% to 10% the wealth limit. (Depending on what the thing is). Companies may also not hold property or money in lieu of an individual personally; everything the company owns must have a global company function; and not personally benefit one or more people only. (Basically no executive-only or owner-only Jets; everyone from the tiniest manager on up should have access to it if there’s a business reason for it)

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Oh I agree that even 2 billion is too much, but my reasoning is that proponents of capitalism often make the claim that capitalism drives innovation (you try to fill some market niche in order to get rich) so if they are right, then 2 billion should be enough that this still works.

              I had yachts depreciating to zero in my example because it’s estimated that you have to spend about 10% of its’ purchase price annually anyway, so anyone keeping a 20 year old yacht around is going to be spending a lot of money on it that will fuel other parts of the economy.

          • greencactus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Holy cow, they can lose 90% of their wealth and still be above 100 mil. The math checks out, but my gosh, how rich are they?!

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              It’s ridiculous.

              Numbers are funny, anyway. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s net worth is closer to yours and mine than it is to Elon Musk (Forbes list currently placing them at ~100 bill and ~250 bill respectively). But that’s only in absolute terms. In reality, Jensen’s got like 8 or 9 orders of magnitude more wealth than I do depending on how far into the month we are, and on the same order of magnitude as Musk.

              Either one losing 99% of their wealth would still be above a billion.

        • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          with 100mils you can buy two luxurious houses and still have enough money to spend a million each year which is more money than most people make in their entire life, so yea kind of on the border.

      • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hey, there might be some politicians on here who can always call up their good friends whenever they need something!

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        For everyone following along at home: this website is worth a click if you’ve never seen it before!

      • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Represented as a volume is also great. If I’m not wrong, his wealth in 500€ bills is a 165 m (180 yards) cube. One million is 3 l (a little less than 0.8 gallons).

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Which of course is a stupid comparison indicative of economic ignorance, because wealth does not grow linearly for anyone who doesn’t stuff their money under a mattress.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hell, even if you can easily afford way more than that, you are still closer to the person who can only afford $2 of food a day than a billionaire.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ain’t that the truth! I’m a lay off and a medical emergency from needing to do this diet.

      Billionaires are either an apocalypse or a revolution away from needing to do this.

      One of these is much more likely to happen tomorrow than the other.

  • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Feel free to ask me questions on how to eat on a budget so you can keep your strength up while organizing against those that wish nothing more for you to work until the day you die and own nothing of consequence!

  • spaduf@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok but for real tho. The average American severely underestimates how far you can get on rice, beans, lentils and chickpeas.

    • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Serious question, if I live off just that, I end up feeling like absolute garbage. That’s even with supplementing it with greens like spinach and some other veggies and vitamin supplements. What am I missing?

      Like, macro-wise, I can replace meat and other things, but it doesn’t seem to hit the same?

      • Vritrahan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Get a blood test. You could have a micronutrient deficiency. It is common to develop either vitamin D, B or iron deficiencies when you cut meat since they just aren’t as abundant outside of red meat and organ meat.

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Would you care to elaborate on what you feel like when you try living on plants? What do you tend to eat? How long does it take before you start feeling like shit?

        Judging by your last comment about it “not hitting the same” my initial thought is that the issue might not even be nutritional, possibly more psychological/subjective.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Don’t know what you’re missing because we don’t know everything you eat

        Spinach gives iron so based off the information it’s not that

      • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I end up feeling like absolute garbage.

        Maybe, not cooking it well enough? Try changing your recipes, perhaps? Maybe more variety in spices?
        Gram, pulses and dried beans (rehydrated before eating) with rice, tend to make my favourite recipes
        and even though I use milk products, I feel pretty good even if it is lemonade with black-salt instead.

        • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh, it tastes fine, I’m saying like…energy-wise and sugar-crash-wise I feel bad. Just wondering if I’m missing something.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      If I could get us all to protest grocery store prices by eating nothing but staples whenever there is a random price increase I would die happy XD

    • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Rice amd beans is the most important thing on my region’s diet. You just can’t live without eating it at least once.

      • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Capitalism demands you eat legumes or go into debt.

        The rebellion demands you stay alive how you need to and organize, which in the US means eating cheap proteins as you gotta.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What about eating people’s cats and allegedly ducks as well? Did you know thousands of pets are euthanized each year? That’s all just wasted food.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The “red necks” who do road kill specials are just fighting against ground beef being $5/pound (which is somehow after all the subsidies they get in the US)!

      I feel like some red neck making fun of is straight up just making fun of folks who found a way to make do and be happy. Like owning your own land with a little pre fab you learned to maintain yourself, and eating lots of hunted game? Good stuff.

        • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          This is ML memes. If you came in here expecting us not to be over the top about “seize the means of production” and “eat the rich” then you gotta pay more attention.

          Sometimes I wonder if I’m far enough to the left to participate in ML.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      This man asking the real questions. As a non-conservative, I try to eat cats and dogs three times a week, and keep lagumes and oats to the other days.

      I never touch animal protein, as the fascists plant tracking devices in these creatures! Birds are also a concern, as they aren’t real and are really government survailance devices!

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Unionization isn’t enough, we need syndicalism. They’re like Unions but armed, more organized, more willing to strike and sabotage, and unlike Unions which attempt to hold back the Capitalists Syndicates replace capitalism entirely. Remember, why demand the scraps of the capitalists when we can take the means of production and the complete value of our labor.

    Pro life tip: Read theory, join your local socialist or anarchist organization, get involved, strike, sabotage, just make sure to organize

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Hey won’t this get us banned… oh right, ML!”

      If they bring armed thugs to the strikes, only fair if strikers do as well. Negotiation only happens between parties on equal footing.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Syndicalism is nice, but without a solid analysis of Imperialism it risks taking on a Nationalist character if you’re in the Imperial Core. Additionally, if you’re in a de-industrialized nation like the United States, worker organization is more difficult along union lines, which is partially why Unions have historically struggled in the United States in recent years.

      100% agree on reading theory and joining an org, just wanted to add some caveats.

  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just posted this a bit ago:

    “Sean Aloysius O’Brien… They fished his body out of the Allegheny river a week before the strike ended. Thirty two bullets he had in him. Or was it thirty four?” -Miles O’brien

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Hey if you have a legal place to hunt, go wild!

      Buying anything but the cheapest of meats these days is eye watering. I’m not one for hunting, but I keep debating going foraging since I live near mountains in Utah. Spend the day hiking in nice weather and end the day with food you normally wouldn’t have? Sounds like a good day.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    What’s the difference between a chick pea and a garbanzo bean?

    spoiler

    I’ve never paid to have a garbanzo bean on my face