Does that make it better or worse?
Does that make it better or worse?
Is this a bot?
I worked retail at a store that had a rule that we DO NOT rush customers out if they come in before we lock the doors. We were NOT allowed to mention we were closed and we were NOT allowed to roll out merchandise to the aisles.
Corportate was confused on how our store had so much overtime when customers would regularly walk in a minute before close, stay an hour and buy nothing.
Blind Al helps Deadpool though???
Never met a Paul I liked. Clearly your statement is false.
:)
Byron? Is that you???
This feels like we are on the Fallout timeline. How are we doing if Fallout was rebranded to get the world stuck in the early 00’s?
So on a smaller scale it makes some sense.
I own a service that sublets from another business on days they do not operate.
The owner of the other business is retiring, my business is buying his business.
Wow med school has really upped their game.
To confirm, you are asserting that the foundation for your answer (mathematical reasoning) does not require any mathematics to understand why it is true.
It’s very dangerous to take a reductionist approach and not be aware of the baked in assumptions you are using. For example, the terms even and odd (for this problem) are well defined as concepts for integers. Which means that your hand-wave statement is true as a result of definitions that were likely created to ensure this property held true.
The notion that “I don’t need math to understand why this is true” is like saying “I made an observation on a phenomenon and I don’t need science to know it’s true.” Which, as you are hopefully aware, is again reductionist and leads to a huge distrust of science from the science illiterate.
Which is the layman’s terms of the proof… I don’t get what your goal is.
Is it a building block for learning to read mathematical works? Yes, of course it is. Is this a ridiculous formalized statement? Yes, of course it is. But that’s the point. We need to practice the trivial to build the scaffolding to tackle the exceptional.
I am not wont to draw conclusions with minimal evidence, but your post seems like you are a malicious reductionist that may be suffering from Dunning Kruger syndrome. I apologize in advance if I have miscategorized you based on this limited sample.
Edit: I am never happy with my formatting.
That’s the nature of politics both short and long term.
I read this as “Xbox learns why teachers send e-mails home.”
That is what I would expect a bot to say!