![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/7b0211f0-7266-4e13-9d26-8c3e6126af62.png)
Nothing. Let the boring people enjoy their boring games made by soulless corporations. Just leave the indie scene alone :)
beep boop
Nothing. Let the boring people enjoy their boring games made by soulless corporations. Just leave the indie scene alone :)
Short Summary:
Open back: 125$ AKG K-702 i personally used these before and can recommend them.
Closed Back: 133$ AKG K-371 Im an AKG fan so although i havent personally tested these ones, they have a good rating so i would recommend these.
These two are studio headphones, so they are not super bass heavy but try to be close to recording/true frequency distribution instead.
In ears can often be much better value (eg cheaper) but i dont really know enough to recommend something (check the following list, there are some very well rated ones in the 20-30$ range.)
==============================
Exhaustive Lists:
Crinacle is a dude that ranks headphones and has not led me astray so far.
The following are big ranked list that start at S Tier meaning the list starts at 5-6 digit prices… Just scroll down until you find something in your price range that you like and has a decent rating. The prices might be different from whats listed there tho, because they change all the time.
If you want in ears: https://crinacle.com/rankings/iems/
If you want over ears: https://crinacle.com/rankings/headphones/
With over ears, be aware of the difference between closed/open backs. Open backs give you better surround and more natural sound in my experience, while being able to hear things around you. If your surroundings are loud, you might want closed backs instead.
That covers like 99% of all private car use.
Shouldve slightly tilted all the buildings as an extra easteregg
I mean for gaming, headphones are always better imo, but if you want speakers then personally i would go for used ones at that price range.
You will just get much more value for you money, but you will need to have a bit of patience to get a good deal.
Honestly even a mini amp with some random passive speakers will be a better experience than whatever active speakers you can get for 100$.
I once installed this type of thing for someone that found some passive speakers in the trash and was really strapped on money.
You arent legally required to buy any devices… Just dont and go live in the forest.
The most important parts are missing from your question.
How much money are you willing to spend? Do you just want small 2 way speakers or small + subwoofer or 3 way speakers?
As someone else mentioned, KRK can be pretty good value but decent active studio monitors start around the 200$ area at the minimum. This site is my go to for audio stuff https://www.thomannmusic.com/active_nearfield_monitors.html
I have been happily using a pair of Fostex PM0.4C that i got on sale for 250€ but i dont know how availability is wherever you are.
This Focusrite Scarlett Solo is THE standard audio interface you will find in many budget or mobile audio studios, but this is not really needed for most people. https://www.thomannmusic.com/focusrite_scarlett_solo_4th_gen.htm
With 7 years of active use, USB-C is already 25% of the way there then.
Once you actually start using devices that fully utilize all that USB-C has to offer, there is no going back. Getting lots of Power Delivery, Display, Networking and enough bandwidth for other USB devices all over one cable is just so good. At work i just walk up to any monitor, which will have all the necessary stuff attached, plug in one cable to my laptop and im good to go.
The USB-C standard will probably last as long as USB-A has so far or longer.
While U.K. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak criticized Just Stop Oil protestors after they sprayed Stonehenge with rain-dissolvable orange cornflour powder the day before the Summer Solstice earlier this month his government is pressing on with a road tunnel that could alter the monuments ritual landscape for ever.
Hmmmmmmmmm. Where are all the outraged little industry apologists, that were so mad about the lil bit of easily removable paint, from the post last week.
Yeah idk either sadly. But i know that having only two relevant browsers on the market is like the US party system. Destined to fail.
Nothing lasts forever just like Steam or anything else will one day turn to shit. But pretending like everything is fine will just lead to lots of “we shouldve seen it coming”.
I mean (assuming thats the author idk) he was imagining a dystopian world, so this is a compliment in my book.
With how doopid i am sometimes i feel like i also only ejaculate nonsense (into the genepool)
Yeah i was kinda overreacting but it really isnt looking good for firefoxes future at this point imo. As long as its open source there will at least be forks like librewolf.
Do you read any tech news? If so how did u miss every single mozilla headline of the past months? Something being the lesser evil doesnt turn truths into lies.
If you are so keen to know, then you will just have to wait a few more years. Firefoxes development is rapidly derailing into nonsense recently. They will have to either kick out their current leadership or they will be reduced to a data sucking, adware company sooner or later.
The quick and dirty way would be making a seperate community with a bot that automatically crossposts any post from those communities to the one you created.
But the good way would be a client side grouping feature where you can manually add communities to a subfeed.
I dont think there can be a universal solution, because there would have to be some sort of consensus as to how communities should be grouped.
Defund Mozilla lmao. Absolute shipwreck of a company at this point.
They are just socialist u see. Its OUR own good :)
2FA doesnt prevent the institutions, that you use it with, from collecting your data tho.