+1 to waistline. Also the dev team is pretty friendly for contributors

So you mean like parameterized queries, which exist?

but why

Except that’s still a SQL dialect, not JSX. There’s no need to make this JSX.

Bold of you to assume they don’t do that with the locally processed data too

It’s propagated itself across the entire world and overtaken opposition repeatedly so I’d say in every way that matters, yes but unironically.

And this isn’t praising capitalism, this is stating that your alternative had better be more robust than the current most robust system in existence.

IRC

OP smacks of the criticism of the transwoman advertisement. “Are they really trying to tell us that commodification and fetishization of trans bodies is acceptable?”

No!!! The point is that the entire world is a cautionary tale about what happens when you allow corporations unlimited power!!!

IT’S A DYSTOPIA DUMMY

Option 1

I disagree, I think the techniques are not the issue, but the political-economic will to actually do it. It doesn’t matter if we discover a way to build a zero-footprint efficiently-dense accessible and affordable housing out of entirely reclaimed materials- zoning boards, HOAs, city officials, and all other sorts of shit-eating bureaucrats and busybodies are going to chain themselves to historic parking lots to prevent progress.

To that note, repurposing a parking garage into shelter makes it easy for them to evict the housed and turn it back into a parking garage as per its original design- even potentially arguing that its original design as parking makes it unsafe for human habitation (and they very well could be right- cars and car infrastructure can be very toxic).

Tearing down car infrastructure isn’t just symbolically obliterating car infrastructure, it has very real impacts in making it hard for the pendulum to swing back to building housing for cars and not people.

It’s a neat concept but what we should be doing is obliterating the spaces made for cars and building spaces made for people, not “reclaiming” car space to fit people in it.

The legality is not the issue here dude

Metanephrine, the metabolite of epinephrine

Drink a ton of water and try not to eat too much. You’re metabolizing it and clearing metanephrine, that’s how you feel better.

That’s what I’m hoping - we can’t just burn down any community with spam

Replace a site with CSAM and you’ll find it’s not a site you’ll want to go to in the first place.

Are you being intentionally dense or do you not understand that it’s my point? If someone can flood lemmy with CSAM so easily that the only way to stop it is a site shutdown, then there are not sufficient mitigation measures in place.

I think commenters are getting a little uppity

What praytell the fuck do you mean by this term specifically

I have a recurring donation to the instance, but that’s aside the point.

The developers who build lemmy aren’t able to put in CSAM blocking code. That’s not how this works.

They absolutely can, and every forum under the sun has tools and extensions to help with this. Fucking 4chan has code specifically dedicated to deal with CSAM. You have no clue what you’re talking about.

Oh no! Users can’t read lemmyshitpost and now the world is ending.

Replace this with !technology@lemmy.world, or !selfhosted@lemmy.world, or !announcements@lemmy.world. “Oh no, users can’t read the entire site” yes that is the definition of the end of the site.

You’re not seeing that this isn’t a lemmyshitpost issue, it’s an “any popular community on lemmy” issue. Snarkily taking potshots at lemmyshitpost as a community doesn’t change it.

Turning off the community is a viable option

It’s not “not an option”, it’s the last resort. It’s like saying that your only option to seeing a roach in your apartment is to burn the whole building down. Because doing it means you don’t have a community anymore, and without communities the site has no purpose.