Why not using SI units and m/s?
Why not using SI units and m/s?
I use it quite frequently for both making calls and listening to music or videos.
The OnePlus X is such a beautiful phone. Sadly there’s no ROM left that’s being maintained.
Do you know the old saying:
if privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy.
Just because people might do stuff with things that isn’t intended or even illegal doesn’t mean you should be banning said things.
Otherwise we’d be in a world where we have no kitchen knives, axes, wrenches, food, money, cars, planes, ships, bikes, hands, feet - you know what I mean?
I desperately wish for the Fairphone 5 to have a 3.5 mm jack, but my next phone is going to be the FP5 anyway, because they did all the other things which I care for right or at least better than the competitors.
Me too and I won’t be going back.
I was active on reddit for quite a while and by contributing and visiting the site making reddit money.
I have no desire to feed their greed and what they pulled with their API pricing was nothing but greed and shortsightedness.
I’m gone from reddit for good.
That’s another viewing angle coming to the same result :)
But even before Fcbook purchased Whatsapp, it’d have been the worse choice than Signal.
Nowadays Whatsapp is a very bad choice in a lot of ways except for network effect, which is the only real strength of it.
Speaking of network effect: back when Signal was TextSecure, I could message a total of 2 (two!) contacts with it and the UX was far from being awesome.
Signal has come a long way. The UX is great and I can message a lot of my contacts on Signal now.
Security rarely comes in absolutes. Whatsapp doesn’t appear to be open source. That alone makes it security wise a worse choice than Signal.
Thanks for following that up!
At least the total coal energy use did stay almost the same due to the reduced share of it.
It’s not the win one could’ve hoped for, but it’s not horrible either.
Can you please link sources?
I’m interested in the total TWh of electric energy generated (now and then), because they may very well release more CO2 in total at 55% now compared to 70% 10 years ago.
Please show me in which of Orwell’s writings he suggested that economies should be based off allowing financial criminals to commi their crimes against citizens, unimpeded.
I don’t need to and I won’t, because I never said so.
Please don’t put words in my mouth.
The thesis of 1984 is that when totalitarianism takes hold, we will turn on those we love to protect ourselves.
I was thinking of 1984, too; obviously.
I see it in a more abstract way though.
The consequences of mass surveillance, which are the basis of repressive regimentation of people are what makes lack of privacy dangerous and in my book not desirable - even if it has certain drawbacks, because abandoning privacy just has way more and more severe drawbacks.
This is primarily the issue with libertarians. You guys are constantly applying a book you haven’t read to every situation you don’t like. It’s weird and I think people see through it.
This is primarily the issue with people who think they know others because they’ve read one comment.
It’s weird and I think people see through it.
edit: typos
It’s designed to protect anyone using it - even attackers.
That’s the price to pay for having privacy.
The alternative is an Orwellian dystopia.
Not of it’s neither A nor B ;)
Would you trust ChatGPT to know?