• there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would it be easier for the consumer to get one line item “ALL FEES” on their bill, instead of a more granular, itemized bill that explains the reasons I’m paying for something?

    It isn’t easier. It’s just more obfuscating.

    • TauriWarrior@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      “The labels must be displayed to consumers at the point of sale and include monthly price, additional charges, speeds, data caps, additional charges for data, and other information.”

      Its talking about point of sale not bills

        • TauriWarrior@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The point of it is that they have to show the max cost, not say it cost $59 then once you’ve signed up start charging $74 because of undisclosed ‘hidden’ costs. We don’t deal with that bullshit in Australia, my ISP tells me it’ll cost $99 a month for my chosen speed and unlimited data, thats what I pay no extra charges unless i select a package that gives me extra.

          • there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I imagine that would take a very, very specific law here in America. Corporations screwing over customers is our new national pastime. But honestly as long as I saw the total bill with no change from what was advertised to me that would be fine too.

    • Spacemanspliff@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because then they don’t have to come up with technobabble to disguise what the fees are, can you imagine if they actually listed “yatcht fee” the peasents would revolt.