The optometrist recommended seamless bifocals. I have a very painful nerve condition in my face (atypical trigeminal neuralgia), so this is what I need with glasses: the lightest weight frames possible- known as ultra light- with the lightest weight lenses possible and automatically darkening lenses so I don’t need the weight of sunglasses. The cheapest frames brought the total to $250 on the site the insurance worked with.

The frames are $20 on the cheap site. Everything else in the cost is the lenses.

As for why I have to buy them online- I don’t want anyone touching my face unless it’s absolutely necessary. The exam was painful enough.

American for-profit healthcare is fucking awesome.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Because I don’t have a metal stamping machine? What a silly question. If I say someone is overcharging for smoothies it doesn’t mean I need to open my own cafe.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        And yet you can still get them for under $50 when those are usually being sold for over $200. It’s because they have a designer label on them. I’m sure you understand that.

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Are you actually blind to the extra complexity of the shape? Go get the cheap glasses with the simple build quality. Don’t complain that other people are paying for extra features like magnet clip filters and much nicer build quality. Get what you need.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Why you think I care what you spend your money on, I don’t know. I never made this personal.

            • Mango@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              So what’s your complaint here? Why are you making a big deal about how I suggested some really nice glasses that cost half what you posted about?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                All I was saying was that they seemed really overpriced. I’m sorry you took it personally, but I never made it personal.

                Also, I would suggest it is not especially helpful to offer a link to expensive frames when someone is infuriated about how much they had to pay for glasses.

                • Mango@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  You said so much more than that, and they’re half the price you paid. There’s alternatives.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    From my original post:

                    The frames are $20 on the cheap site. Everything else in the cost is the lenses.

                    Did you not read it?