It. Is. Never. Enough.

You paid hundreds of dollars for a new monitor, but it doesn’t matter. More ads, more profits.

I hate it.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      As with all these services, the “disagree” option is “stop using our devices and services” which really should be illegal when it’s tied to hardware you already bought it and the terms changed after the fact.

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I bought an LG microwave a few months ago to replace a dead 10 year old Sharp. My favorite “features”:

        • The sticker on the door stating that by using the microwave I agree to LG’s TOS, including binding arbitration.
        • The single 4 minutes and 30 seconds of use I got out of it before the magnetron broke.

        When I returned it they customer service person asked if I wanted it serviced under warranty – hilarious. Bought a Panasonic instead.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I wonder how things would go if they made you agree to the terms before being allowed to purchase it.

        People bring it to the till, and then just hand it back saying nope.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s our hardware so we should be able to select another provider or host our own. Not that I consider ad tracking a “service”.

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Seeing the word “smart” in a device description has become a warning flag.

  • folekaule@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    This needs to go viral and be posted in reviews for every monitor with this “feature”. Heck, make a convenient warning icon indicating “adware” for such reviews so I can scroll past them faster.

    No way I’m risking buying a TV or monitor from LG after seeing this. It would go right back in the box to be returned.

  • squid_slime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was so pissed when I realised most of the feature on my smart monitor were disabled by disallowing network connection. especially when those features where present on my non smart monitor. Things like dual input so having two devices over HDMI / DPI display on separate portions of the screen was fine on my old lg ultra wide but on the new smart ultra wide it is disabled all because I won’t agree to they’re terms.

    • 1984@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      This should be illegal. That functionality has nothing to do with accepting ads.

      This is really upsetting to see them get away with this.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Returning is not enough. Boycotting is not enough. We need to be marching on the FTC and Congress with torches and pitchforks about this shit!

  • Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    This just makes me think of every thread complaining about smart tvs and every comment saying “just buy a monitor!”

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Like that’s the only thing we got left people and that’s why they are making returns such a bitch now

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Louis Rossmann has LG as an anti-sponsor. He calls them out for their bullshit in some of his videos.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Report it as a bug. No matter if it was on purpose, a TV displaying ads is malfunctioning, they have to fix it.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would return that shit immediately. There is absolutely no use for smart functionality in a computer monitor. I would suspect it’s a TV sold as a monitor and will have the same issues as using a TV as a monitor.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        IT here, Yes, by all means involve me. I will buy a second monitor and plug it into a known box that is no business going anywhere. I will then block, at the network firewall level, any outbound traffic to anything that thing talks to. If it uses its own MAC address at the head end I will then collect and publish every connection that thing tries to make outside to a blacklist and provide it to the public.

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Easily. I could also simply deny it access to the internet. But sometimes you need to look out for more than just your own.

        • vithigar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sounds way more interesting than most IT work as well. I’d definitely rather do some investigative work like this than a typical parade of password resets, email assistance, and software installations.

          • Emerald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I had to ask a helpdesk for a 2fa reset once. Intrestingly, they didn’t make me identify myself except for first and last name. Not sure what point the 2FA has if it’s that easy to remove.

            • rolaulten@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Depending on the help desk they probably knew it was you. Did you call from a phone HR knows about? If it was a walk up, did they make the ticket before or after resetting your MFA?

              • Emerald@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                They do have the phone number on record, so I guess that’s what they did. More likely though they didn’t even check. They made no ticket either, just reset it in the course of an around 3 minute call.

                • rolaulten@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Are you sure there is no ticket? Some systems let you make tickets that the end user is not notified for. Also, depending on the size/ levels of automation your call may have populated all your info on the agents end.