DIGITALFALL
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 1 year ago

Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything?

slrpnk.net

message-square
116
link
fedilink
908

Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything?

slrpnk.net

ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Political Weirdos @lemmy.world · 1 year ago
message-square
116
link
fedilink
  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

    I don’t know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it’s because I’m not into any sketchy shit.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the step between mistress and partner.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh…yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

        At least with mistress’s and partners consent is a key factor.

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

          It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage

    • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an old term for a pleasure slave.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, concubinage was typically consensual.

        • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I’m trying to remember the exact quote, but I’ll paraphrase it here: ‘In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.’ https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Historically consent has often been quite optional, when it comes to marriage, concubinage, and the like…

Political Weirdos @lemmy.world

political_weirdos@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !political_weirdos@lemmy.world

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

  • Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
  • Follow Iemmy.world TOS
  • Don’t be a jerk
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 9 users / day
  • 1.93K users / week
  • 3.8K users / month
  • 7.01K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 1.26K subscribers
  • 330 Posts
  • 10.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org