In a recent update to the HSBC app they’ve added a screen to prevent you from using the app unless you use the default (google) keyboard.

They do a similar thing if you have an accessibility service running that can access the screens content. A fair enough security warning if you’ve happened to install a dodgy keyboard app, but highly frustrating when using an open source alternative that enhances the security and privacy over the default option (HeliBoard in my case).

I haven’t found a way to circumvent the page yet. It would be useful if Android allowed you to block the permission to query all packages, but alas.

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    8 days ago

    banks will do everything in their power to restrict who can use their services in the name of security but are absolutely fine with 6-char password size limits and SMS 2FA

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    If my bank’s app ever forces me to choose between my keyboard of preference and their app, it’s their app that’s getting uninstalled.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think it’s a great option to warn people about. Or even force switching of the keyboard for that one app. But it shouldn’t require you to set a system sitting.

        • lka1988@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Bingo. I will happily go out of my way to modify things, and if the methods provided to hide root/bootloader ststu from any particular app don’t work, then that app gets uninstalled.

    • ccunning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Have the security risks associated with third party keyboards been mitigated somehow? I made the decision not to use them years ago and have never revisited it.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Of course there will always be some risk. But HeliBoard and some other keyboard apps are open source and can be audited. I’d trust (I know, you should do your own homework) the more popular ones have a lot of eyes in them.

        • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          As someone who doesn’t have the time, skill, or knowledge to audit open source projects, I agree on the trusting more popular open source keyboards (and by extension popular open source projects in general).

      • GlenRambo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fist party keyboards have the exact same permissions. The code is hidden though and noone can audit it.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’m not sure about this app especially, but I hate that my bank personally has so many restrictions on the app usage but I can also just use a web browser on God knows what with who knows what extensions installed and they’re all like sure, come on in!

    • redshift@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 days ago

      They likely won’t allow that forever. If Google has its way with the web, trusted browser environments will be a thing, and banks will only accept those.

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      were you also against cache attestation and manifest v3?

  • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Considering that HSBC is remarkably evil, even compared to other major international banking corporations, this might be a good nudge to stop doing business with them.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      You would have to be extremely evil to be a far comparison to any other bank.

      Thats impressive.

    • HereIAm@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t really have a reason to stay with HSBC. A responsible me would look for a bank with better credit card interest. Might as well shop around for a new one.

  • 3 dogs in a trenchcoat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    They do a similar thing if you have an accessibility service running that can access the screens content

    Well fuck disabled people I guess?

    • mcherm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Actually, banks are a heavily regulated industry and they have to comply with strict non-discrimination requirements including making all reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities.

      If you know someone who uses a screen reader and is therefore unable to use HSBC’s app, encourage them to file a complaint with the appropriate regulator (in the US, try https://www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/ ).

      Banks are very attentive about listening to their regulators.

      (Of course, it’s possible that what HSBC did still works with commonly used screen readers for the blind because they actually thought of this.)

    • HereIAm@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah it is bad. Maybe it’s the case again that the default screen reader is allowed but third party ones aren’t?

      Okay, I just tested turning on the built in screen reader and it launched just fine 😑

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 days ago

    I understand the reason for this, but if this is what they’ve decided to do they should also provide a trusted HSBC keyboard that can only be used with their banking application.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Can apps has their own keyboard and never call the system one? Installing their kb as another app and as a system one at that would be 200% more infuriating. Now THEY can log your keys elsewhere.

      • projectmoon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 days ago

        They can build a keyboard into it, sure. It’s just UI elements and a bunch of buttons. Won’t be a good keyboard, but it can be done.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s possible. First example I can think of is NYT’s games app uses their own keyboard. It’s clunky, but if someone is concerned (or data hungry) enough for the users security they certainly could.

      • serenissi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I find banking apps pretty infuriating. Don’t support rooted/custom rom. Too easy to make mistake. Susceptible to ‘malware’ (ie intent jacking or if the app logs tokens in logcat lol). I use netbanking when needed. For txn logs, mostly SMS works fine.

        I find keeping bank account logged in always isn’t necessary and just a invitation of hassles.