• EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    …smaller communities

    So like it was before the dawn of Reddit and social media?

    Sign me the fuck up. I miss my dumb little websites with a dodgy layout full of terribly cropped gifs.

  • obbeel@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    I firmly believe that connecting people to their IRL friends is an important part of the potential of the Internet, as it is shown by Facebook, for example.

    But I also believe there are people looking to connect with new people and finding a community where they can express themselves wholly. I think the current Internet is weak in this regard, weaker than it has been before, but I think it’s possible to build a place where people can connect.

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Pretty much. I should be able tobmake friends with any human on earth with an internet connection. That this is still hard is something we need to fix

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I have a friends Discord I set up a year before Covid, and for about a year only 3 people used it, mainly to play some games together.

      But when Covid hit, it obviously gained some traction. And now it’s THE place I interact with friends since I’ve long ditched the likes of Facebook.

      I keep going back and forth on whether or not to possibly set up a Mastodon server for friends. The hardest part would be convincing people to use it. But it could just be like our little shared space that could still interact with the wider world. It’d be kinda cool to have a Local feed be just people you know in real life.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        A small friend group is best suited for chat programs (discord et al.) But if you want to expand the group a mastodon server is a good idea

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It is for me, but I have my doubts that the majority will avoid the corporate-owned spaces.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Depends on where you live, but in the US I think there will be a sharp divide between two general groups: a minority who put some thought into what they do, and the vast meme-ified masses who accept whatever is laid out for them.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think it’s always going to be a sort of long-tail phenomenon, with most people involved in the biggest platforms, but a large number of small platforms that attract a minority of the overall population.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Check out Neocities, a great community of indie web fans, built in the spirit of the old GeoCities sites.

    Some really great sites there, it really captures that late 90’s to early 2000’s internet vibes.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Definitely depends on the site because I’ve seen some impressive modern looking sites in the past, but a lot of sites I find on there definitely encapsulate that vibe in a great way.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I think by now we have figured out the majority of people are garbage and you only want to spend time with a select group. Discord seems to have this figured out.

        • dontbelasagne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t think we have. Some people theorise that the tower of babel really happened. Whether you’re religous or not doesn’t really matter but it shows that during the earliest recorded days humanity wanted to help each other and everyone by building a tower. There are theories as to why god didn’t allow the tower to reach them so then the blame is put on god, not humanity.

          • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            The theological explanation I’ve been hearing recently for that is that God didn’t want humanity to be a monolithic entity, but rather to have many different flavors and cultures. Supporting evidence is that in Revelation there is reference to all of the nations and tribes on the Earth being represented in heaven. Meaning that those cultures are retained, minus the worst parts of them. It’s actually a great argument for intentional diversity and allowing people groups to maintain their uniqueness rather than assimilate into a global conglomerate.

            • dontbelasagne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              But to play devil’s advocate (pun very much intended) in the gnostic scripture of the nag Hamadi it straight up says whoever parctipated in the tower of babel will go to hell. Why punish people when they thought they were doing good? And the nag hamadi also says whatever happens in the world is god’s will. Meaning every single event in history whether good or bad is because god wanted it that way. So according to the nag hamadi god wanted all the wars, all the climate change, all the confusion, all the rape and murder is because god wanted it. Why aren’t we born with knowledge of every language if god wanted diverse languages? That way people will choose the language they speak rather than it being forced upon them from wherever they’re born. The nag hamadi actually answers every existential question if you read it objectively without any pre existing beliefs in my personal view. We don’t have any free will on earth according to the nag hamadi and this is the only universe that exists.

              • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 days ago

                There are a lot of gnostic writings but they don’t hold much value. They were essentially rejected when they were written. You did ask an interesting question though, why we aren’t born with knowledge of every language if God wanted to diverse languages.

                I’ve read theology about this as well, and the answer that I’m hearing at the moment regarding that has to do with the speaking in tongues that was released at Pentecost. On that occasion, there were people from many other regions assembled in Jerusalem and when they began to speak in tongues, people from foreign lands heard their own native tongue spoken clearly. The way it’s described, it seems even the dialects were correct.

                It’s not clear if that was a miracle of being able to speak in a language they didn’t understand, or if it was a miracle of understanding. But it does seem to be a reversal of the confusion that was caused by the multiple languages at the tower of Babel, yet retaining the diversity and also creating unity. The inferred implication is that the same kind of understanding will be available in eternity when all of the brokenness of this world is restored with a new heaven and new Earth.

    • dontbelasagne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It depends on the discord. I joined a discord where the most narcissistic people were there and they singled me out for whatever reason because I wasn’t just simply going with their thinking. There was another member that thought like me but their own narcissi tendencies made up a conspiracy theory that somehow that was my alt. I didn’t even know the guy irl. It’s a shame as I was interested in the subject matter of the discord but I guess if enough village idiots own a discord, the smart villager is seen as the idiot.

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    We should be able to bootstrap activityPub to GeoCities websites. WordPress integration is taking a long time.

    • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s backwards, activitypub is higher level than websites. And you can literally make a website already and embed an activitypub stream

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Small communities where one can talk about specific subjects? Man there’s something like that already and people can run it from their own computers too, forgot the name though.

    • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      The best I can think of off hand is to look at the mobile apps that are designed to interact with traditional forums, because they will have directories of all the ones that are integrated with them. For example, Tapatalk and Fora Communities. You should be able to find thousands of forums categorized in those apps? I’ve never used these apps myself, but have heard of them.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Thank fuck the corporate silo era is (slowly) coming to an end. And they tried so hard to turn it into TV 2.0.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Depends on how you measure things. If you pie-chart the internet by bandwidth used, most of it is currently used for TV 2.0 (streaming video, mostly by subscription.)

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I really don’t consider streaming services to be the “real” internet. It’s video on demand, and not a communication, socialization and creation space like the rest of the net.