• taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Honestly, if the existing victims have to deal with a few more people masturbating to the existing video material and in exchange it leads to fewer future victims it might be worth the trade-off but it is certainly not an easy choice to make.

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t though.

      The most effective way to shut these forums down is to register bot accounts scraping links to the clearnet direct-download sites hosting the material and then reporting every single one.

      If everything posted to these forums is deleted within a couple of days, their popularity would falter. And victims much prefer having their footage deleted than letting it stay up for years to catch a handful of site admins.

      Frankly, I couldn’t care less about punishing the people hosting these sites. It’s an endless game of cat and mouse and will never be fast enough to meaningfully slow down the spread of CSAM.

      Also, these sites don’t produce CSAM themselves. They just spread it - most of the CSAM exists already and isn’t made specifically for distribution.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Who said anything about punishing the people hosting the sites. I was talking about punishing the people uploading and producing the content. The ones doing the part that is orders of magnitude worse than anything else about this.

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I’d be surprised if many “producers” are caught. From what I have heard, most uploads on those sites are reuploads because it’s magnitudes easier.

          Of the 1400 people caught, I’d say maybe 10 were site administors and the rest passive “consumers” who didn’t use Tor. I wouldn’t put my hopes up too much that anyone who was caught ever committed child abuse themselves.

          I mean, 1400 identified out of 1.8 million really isn’t a whole lot to begin with.

            • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Not quite. Reuploading is at the very least an annoying process.

              Uploading anything over Tor is a gruelling process. Downloading takes much time already, uploading even more so. Most consumer internet plans aren’t symmetrically either with significantly lower upload than download speeds. Plus, you need to find a direct-download provider which doesn’t block Tor exit nodes and where uploading/downloading is free.

              Taking something down is quick. A script scraping these forums which automatically reports the download links (any direct-download site quickly removes reports of CSAM by the way - no one wants to host this legal nightmare) can take down thousands of uploads per day.

              Making the experience horrible leads to a slow death of those sites. Imagine if 95% of videos on [generic legal porn site] lead to a “Sorry! This content has been taken down.” message. How much traffic would the site lose? I’d argue quite a lot.

    • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Well, some pedophiles have argued that AI generated child porn should be allowed, so real humans are not harmed, and exploited.

      I’m conflicted on that. Naturally, I’m disgusted, and repulsed. I AM NOT ADVOCATING IT.

      But if no real child is harmed…

      I don’t want to think about it, anymore.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Issue is, AI is often trained on real children, sometimes even real CSAM(allegedly), which makes the “no real children were harmed” part not necessarily 100% true.

        Also since AI can generate photorealistic imagery, it also muddies the water for the real thing.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        that is still cp, and distributing CP still harms childrens, eventually they want to move on to the real thing, as porn is not satisfying them anymore.

      • quack@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Understand you’re not advocating for it, but I do take issue with the idea that AI CSAM will prevent children from being harmed. While it might satisfy some of them (at first, until the high from that wears off and they need progressively harder stuff), a lot of pedophiles are just straight up sadistic fucks and a real child being hurt is what gets them off. I think it’ll just make the “real” stuff even more valuable in their eyes.

        • 🎨 Elaine Cortez 🇨🇦 @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I feel the same way. I’ve seen the argument that it’s analogous to violence in videogames, but it’s pretty disingenuous since people typically play videogames to have fun and for escapism, whereas with CSAM the person seeking it out is doing so in bad faith. A more apt comparison would be people who go out of their way to hurt animals.

      • misteloct@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Somehow I doubt allowing it actually meaningfully helps the situation. It sounds like an alcoholic arguing that a glass of wine actually helps them not drink.