Does the reddit style format inherently make for a toxic environment? Or is it a culture of toxicity from the influx of reditors? For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. On mastodon, people can’t downvote you. These platforms are a joy to use, lemmy is depressing if you post. Its depressing because every post or comment, no mater the quality comes with downvotes, and usually no criticism to accompany it, you are left not knowing if youve made a mistake, or if its just trolls, bots, or idiots. At the end you feel insulted not improved. What do you think?

  • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just post what you want to post and ignore the votes. A few downvotes is to be expected. Try not to read into them so much.

  • CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mastodon was very depressing for me, this follower centric self presentation stuff is super not my style, it don’t want it to be about me, I most likely suck but I say smart things some times, so I want it to be about the stuff I say.

    Plus I don’t mind being downvoted into oblivion. I actually think that this can be a good thing. It means that there was something at least controversial about what I posted so I might be wrong or have to argue better.

    Lastly, mastodon is too much safe space and filter bubble. I want to read things from people that I disagree with and I want to argue with them in good faith. When I tried this on mastodon, I got misquoted, blocked, harassed… You name it.

  • alianne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This sparks a few different thoughts for me:

    1. I believe there are a few Lemmy instances that don’t have downvotes enabled. (Beehaw might be one of them, but don’t quote me on that.) If downvotes are a stress point for you, you could try joining one of those instances.
    2. I personally find both upvotes and downvotes to be useful as a way for me to quickly see the community’s reaction to a piece of content. If I’m scrolling through my feed and see a post with many downvotes and few upvotes, for example, I know that post is unlikely to interest me and will move on. Conversely, a highly upvoted post or one with a mix of both upvotes and downvotes is more likely to have a good conversation in the comments in my experience.
    3. If I make a post that receives a large number of downvotes - or if most of my posts tend to be downvoted - that’s a signal to me that I’m either not communicating my message well (confusing, passive aggressive, etc.) or that my message itself may not be welcome (hate speech, misinformation, etc.). In either case, I use that as a mental trigger for me to reflect on my posts rather than a reason to become unhappy with the community/platform as a whole.
    • MiloSquirrel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would also add that getting a post mass downvoted can be a sign that a community might not be a good fit for you.

      Like, using reddit as an example, if you see someone spreading anti-lgbt hate and getting upvoted, but when you try to be like “Hey that’s not cool” or explain why they’re wrong you get massively downvoted, it can be a really good sign that maybe it’s not a great place.

      • alianne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, and I would extend this thought to also include situations where it’s simply the wrong audience for your post. The content itself may not have anything wrong with it, but if you post a casual joke or comment without much depth in a community that’s built on deep conversations and well thought out replies, for example, you’re likely to be downvoted simply because the context wasn’t appropriate.

  • Scooter411@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not trying to be negative here with you - but anyone complaining about downvoted will often get another downvote from me. Say what you want to say, stand by your convictions, and don’t worry about what the internet thinks about that.

    • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I upvote anyone who disagrees with me, as long as they’re not a complete brute about it.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not upset of complaining, I’m observing and philosophizing, this has been an intellectual pursuit, thanks for the reply

    • saddlebag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t see the poster explicitly complaining about getting downvoted. How I read it is that they think that downvoting encourages people to be negative and weaponise their downvote. And, given what you’ve said, they’re spot on and you inadvertently proved their point.

      • Scooter411@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I saw the post more as someone who is too worried about what the group will think of their comment to allow for dissent.

        That being said, what I meant about people who complain about downvotes was the old Reddit trope of “edit: really? Downvote me for asking a question?” On a comment less than an hour old.

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone praising Stack Overflow, that’s a new one. The most criticized thing about SO is the toxicity and elitism of the users. Downvoting almost always comes with no explanation there.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well hold on there, im not tryna praise them. I think we need a free and federated alternative. I only mean to say that an answer always has some verbal feedback on it.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The incrediblely low quality of the feedback is legendary there, though.

        “How do I X?”

        “Do not X. - Fin”

        • Cybersteel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the wrong way to go about things. You show them a clearly incorrect example of a code you need help with but say that it’s a good code and don’t believe anyone can do better. People will jump over themselves to correct you and provide helpful solutions.

          • Barbacamanitu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, Murphy’s Law. Instead of asking a question, just post the wrong answer and someone will come along to correct you.

  • alaxitoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I barely posted on Reddit due to the thought of people hating what I said or posted 😊 I think here is more friendly since it’s not huge, I share what I like and if people don’t agree that’s cool! As long as it makes someone happy it’s worth it ✨

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. … These platforms are a joy to use

    I don’t know what part of the internet you are from, but where I am from, Stackoverflow is looked down on as the quintessential example of toxic behaviour.

    I’ve found some of the most dismissive people in tiny stack exchange groups, and experienced similar unexplained downvotes.

    What SO, Reddit, and Lemmy maybe all have in common I think, is people tend to agree or disagree based on their convictions, as opposed to agreeing or disagreeing as a means of interaction.

    I guess this puts the conflict and disagreement front and center. But at least then I know where people stand.

    Perhaps it’s important to not take opinions too personally, and remember that incencere agreement has its own problems.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree about SO, though I am not a fan of it for other reasons. Interesting thought about acting on convictions. Thanks.

  • Steve@compuverse.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m thinking you care too much about the thoughtless reactions of anonymous strangers.
    Remember… In this game, the points don’t matter.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      its strange because its not the disapproval that gets me, its not knowing why. I guess the lesson is that if someone did not even say why, its not really something anyone actually cared about.

      • Mutelogic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is exactly it. They don’t care about your post or you or anyone really. For them, it just feels good to bring down others.

        • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          i hope/believe that the intent is rarely malicious, that its not really a significant thing at all on that side.

  • I don’t think the format had anything to do with it, considering it was much more like Lemmy is now when I first joined 11 years ago and I’ve seen the same decline in other social mediums that didn’t share formats as Reddit. It’s just what happens when you get enough people together in one place. The abundance of dumb fucks and bad actors simply take over.

  • Chrisosaur@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People breed toxicity, especially if you disagree with them. The more people a site has, the shittier it is. People suck.

    • makanimike@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not necessarily.
      A few years ago, when there was another Reddit Exodus people were suggesting to go to voat. But holy hell was that place toxic.
      And tbh, maybe I just picked the wrong instance to sign up on, but right now, I feel like lemmy is more toxic than Reddit, too, despite still being a fraction of the size.
      And people say to just not care about it. But it kinda does matter. Bullying and brigading can create an in-group and the rest. To the point that you can sway public opinion, even elections. tl;dr: OP makes a valid point

      • Chrisosaur@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think our points are mutually exclusive. Small sites can be shitty while the trend remains that sites get shittier as they get bigger.

      • Barbacamanitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You think Lemmy is more toxic than reddit? I’ve seen the opposite so far. I wonder if this boils down to what communities we are a part of? It makes sense though, since most of lemmy is likely 30+ yrs old and have become jaded by reddit already.

        Also, yes, voat was awful. It was mostly alt right assholes from what I remember.

  • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Downvotes are not a reflection on you, they are a representation of how much everyone else agrees or disagrees.

    I don’t personally want the downvotes hidden or removed like how it is on Youtube.

    • s6original@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the way it was here. Points seem to be working correctly or did. I think it’s a bad idea to put point totals on a users profile for everyone to see. I don’t think totals are or should be important. But upvotes and downvotes are indicators of how much value a reader thinks a post/comment has. You can’t tell the temperature in a room without numbers. But I would rather not see a reddit-like karma system.

    • Dusk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d like an option, user side perhaps that just tucks it away, doesn’t remove it just don’t show it

        • Dusk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just saw that lemmy.world has an option to hide it, shame I don’t see an option for it on memmy, I do see a hide total scores but doesn’t appear to do anything.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is why I’m in favor. I’m not the hugest fan, but if the alternative is YouTube or facebooks like system then I’ll take the downvotes. Otherwise you get the low quality like farms where minions memes are uploaded everywhere and there’s no way to say “we hate these, stop posting them”

  • borlax@lemmy.borlax.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yearning for affirmations via fake internet points is the toxic part, not the format of a website.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, although your comment seems to me to be correct, it misses the point of the question, and the actual question has been answered quite well already by others. Surely the format is not in and of itself toxic, and I personally find it a little strange to think of a format as toxic, though I suppose one could create such a format. Rather, the question is weather the format of the website encourages or indues so called “toxic” behavior or leads to the perception there of, among groups of humans using software in the format in question. Maybe because “yearning for affirmation” is a near universal human trait and the format of the site provides its human users access to a convenient but unreliable metric by which they may measure the approval of their peers. Some of us suppress this drive for approval with to strong self awareness or self esteem or lack it entirely due to mental illness, but it is in almost every human, and of course, our need for approval is of course a double edged blade. It makes society possible, and makes us hate to take part at times.

  • slimsalm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imo, downvotes is just a disagreement. Being offended by it sounds like a “you” problem, we all have to deal with it.

    Upvotes normally give me answers I need for at that moment. Downvotes makes me reassess myself.

    I dont think you must read to much into the downvotes. Understand the situation why people might have downvoted you, understand why other people get upvoted, assess the situation. And most of all, understand that not everybody will always agree with you

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What? people wont agree with me? LIES! (<-- that is a joke). I’m not offended, and i agree, i here, am a truth seeker looking for insight, thanks!

  • ghostwolf@lemmy.fakeplastictrees.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    During my time on reddit, I’ve learnt to appreciate downvotes. Silent feedback is much better than passive-aggressive replies that serve no purpose other than letting the person vent out.

      • Jellojiggle@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I got majorly downvoted once for sharing my opinion on not wanting to travel to a foreign country alone as a woman. A lot of flippant comments too. Like okay, this is not the sub for me. I still can’t believe I was attacked like I was.

    • Joe_0237@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      idk, it sounds good, but to me its a lot like getting a grade with no comments (for the sake of example)

  • Barbacamanitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would always cringe so hard whenever I saw someone on reddit talking about downvotes, lack of upvotes, or karma at all. It’s silly. Quit worrying about it.

    Don’t change the way you express yourself just to make yourself more acceptable to the internet hivemind. The internet is a toxic place. Lots of people simply find joy in anonymously hurting others. Just comment and move on. And maybe reply to comments that are made in good faith.