It has been a long journey.

I have been gradually convincing my family, close relatives and friends to make the switch to Signal for over two years. I am already the “tech support guy” in all my circles so most didn’t really question it. Most of my friends are quite tech-savvy, and some even did use Signal before I talked to them about it.

This also filtered out some “friends” who were never that close to me to begin with. So, that’s a bonus, I guess.

Overall, my recommendation to others interested would be to tell people how much you don’t like Meta’s business model instead of the privacy aspect. I already ditched Facebook and Instagram many years ago, and this helped defend my point a bit better.

  • joeyboon@lemy.nl
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’m planning to delete my WhatsApp by the end of the month and have used Watomatic to send an out of office like message during this month saying I’m no longer reading WhatsApp and how to contact me (Signal, Threema, email). Worked great! Pushed some groups I’m on to Signal without me even asking! The beta group function is still a bit buggy. But would definitely recommend.

  • BladeFederation@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Congrats! I know too many foreigners to get rid of WhatsApp. I try to count my blessings that it’s not WeChat or Facebook Messenger that inexplicably became popular worldwide.

  • Aaoograha_hoa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Can you expand a bit what you tell people about not liking Meta’s business model? I got some people to follow me to Signal, but only for messaging with my husband and me. They don’t really care for the privacy aspect, so I’m curious about your other arguments!

  • 222kitik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    eversince i started using beeper im contempt HAAHAHH all my messaging needs in one app running on device<33 (would love if it’d be foss but it is what it is)

    • BladeFederation@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      The problem with universal clients like that is that it inherently breaks encryption, shares it with a third party, and then MAYBE re-encrypts it correctly. And it does not prevent the third parties like Discord or whatnot from having access to your messages just because you run it through Beeper. It still goes through them. It’s not even particularly more convenient. You still have to create an account with the other provider, and often times this can only be done by downloading the app.

      So there are a lot of downsides, and the only upside is not having as many apps installed, and I doubt you’re hurting THAT bad for storage.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’ve done it quietly 4y ago, only told some closer relatives. It was kind of funny when relatives I wasn’t talking to told my closer ones that we were keeping in touch on WhatsApp, not even aware I wasn’t in the platform for over 6 months at that point.

    Now after years and leaving 2 family groups, politics, and a whole lot of drama behind, I feel it was a great decision, and the only regret was not doing it earlier.

  • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    In my country nowadays you can’t even contact companies and services through regular phone number, you gotta message them on Whatsapp, and I mean, you use Whatsapp to talk with the guy from your neighborhood that fixes roofs to international banking institutions.

      • BladeFederation@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s cool because online based chats have more features but are more susceptible to enshittification. A federated, online based, encrypted open standard like Matrix is the future.

    • JonEFive@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      This is something I didn’t realize until I traveled outside the US. In some places, WhatsApp is the default.

      I’ve always been very anti-Meta, and refused to get on WhatsApp until I ran into that situation.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        What’s app was cool as shit, until, just like Michael Bolton, something shitty in the world happened.

        I installed it for an upcoming trip with loathing just because I know I may stay in places and not be able to connect with a hotel or host if I don’t use whatsapp. The EU better get their shit together since they were trying to lead on digital privacy…

  • AnUnassumingStick@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Lucky, my social circle’s technologically illiterate AND doesn’t care what happens to their personal data so I’m stuck with both Facebook & WhatsApp :/ One saving grace is that I don’t have either installed on my “main” phone.

    Signal’s not great for privacy either tbf - Meta is just a very very low bar to be better than.

    • AcornTickler@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Signal’s not great for privacy either tbf

      Why do you think so? Yeah, it is not anonymous due to requiring a phone number, but all media and metadata are end-to-end encrypted.

      • AnUnassumingStick@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Ended up having to do some more digging on Signal as I was under the impression more metadata was getting left unencrypted than there is.

        My bigger concerns are with whom Signal employs and the very questionable decisions the company’s made.

        Their VP of engineering was at Facebook managing Onavo VPN when that was spying on teenagers using Snapshat. Then, Signal had known their desktop encryption keys were stored in plaintext for six years and only fixed it after public outrage.

        To the best of everyone’s knowledge, Signal’s netcode is solid, but leadership with a history in privacy scandals & negligence towards clear privacy holes is very iffy IMO.

      • AnUnassumingStick@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        What I currently have for privacy is SimpleX - not needing a phone number alone beats Signal - but I’ve also got only a single contact there so it’s not replacing WhatsApp anytime soon 🤷‍♂️

        • dwt@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Yep. That’s why we privacy sensitive people keep coming back for signal and matrix.

  • Broiled_Tofu@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I feel bad for Europeans or folks who need what’s app. Needing Big Tech that impeds social media into your texting app is insane.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s definitely unfortunate that it’s a proprietary closed system owned by big tech. On the other hand, SMS/MMS is a pretty bad user experience by comparison, and it’s unencrypted.

  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    In latin america, this is basically impossible. This also covers people who message a lot of people in latin america.

    They may technically be able to switch, but most of latin america uses things like whatsapp for official communication.

  • SleepyPie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    And to think in ~6 months you’ll probably need to go through that whole song and dance again when you switch them to Matrix 😔