• scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The two counter arguments to this are:

    1. You are giving more personal data to google to prove you live at that address.

    2. A blurred house on street view makes you stand out and can make burglars think you are some rich guy with valuable stuff in their house.

    • Dextofen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah this is exactly like the DNR (Do Not Track Request) built into browsers. It was off by default. Turning it on was only done by privacy focused individuals. But it made you significantly more trackable because almost nobody turns it on, your browser becomes a lot more unique.

      Thankfully browsers stopped supporting it. But this is the same thing. Very few people will use it, so that it’ll make you stand out instead of helping you.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah, I was about to say, I’m not falling for this “privacy” service lol. Nice try, Google.

    • lattrommi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I read somewhere once that some houses are blurred after grisly murders occur there, among other heinous crimes like arson and rapes. That’s what I usually think of wwhen I see a blurred house. I can’t say I’ve ever seen a mansion blurred either.

  • dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    “permanant”

    Brought to you by the same companies that “accidentally” re-add you to their spam lists.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Sadly it is permanent. Moved into a house that was blurred and wanted it unblurred. Sadly they have no process to do that.

      • Polisheocket@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        There on the mail box you just can’t see it from the street easily, I live in a suburb it’s pretty easy to figure it out

            • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 days ago

              I’m pretty sure google will still have your house number associated with your house. You’re just making it harder for people to be sure they’re at the right house when they show up there, like if you fell or choked on your meal and needed an ambulance.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Tbh the outside of my home is publicly viewable anyway. I can’t think of why I’d care much.

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It hurts Google, a tiny bit. If enough people do it, it starts to hurt a lot.

      I doubt a block like þis prevents Google from training þeir DL machines on your house data, but it might prevent 3rd parties from getting pictures of your home from Google to train þeir’s wiþ.

      It’s a legal, eþical means of corporate disobedience which works against þe commoditization of you. You care, because you don’t want to be a product, even if you don’t realize it.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          per Wikipedia:

          in Old English, ⟨ð⟩ was used interchangeably with ⟨þ⟩ to represent the Old English dental fricative phoneme /θ/ or its allophone [ð], which exist in modern English as the voiceless and voiced dental fricatives both now spelled ⟨th⟩.

          • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            In Icelandic, sure. Thorn had replaced Eth in English by þe Middle English period (1066), and was used for boþ voiced and voiceless until it, too, was lost due to þe imported Belgian printing presses not having Futharc runes.

  • isar@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    What if they update the photos every 6 months or so? Would the photo then be unblurred and you gaave google your address for nothing? Or do they blur 3D coordinates?

    • lattrommi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It makes it harder to case the house though. If the street view shows a low overhang, with a easy way up to a second story window, or maybe a tree, A/C heat pump, all sorts of things, then I could see an argument for wanting that blurred.

  • Kushan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Someone on my street has done this and it completely fucks with street view for my own house, even though the blurred house is on a sheet running perpendicular to my street

    I don’t understand why anyone would do this, if anything all it does is draw massive attention to the fact that someone wanted their house blurred.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      What is funny about the house that did it on my street move down one jump and look back and it isn’t blurred.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    This should be opt-in, not opt out. IDGAF if it is public information that is perfectly viewable from the street, it shouldn’t be on the internet without my consent. There are plenty of perfectly good reasons to blur your house aside from the worry of petty thieves. One, your privacy should be treated with respect. Streisand Effect doesn’t really apply here because no one gives a shit if your house is blurred. No one cares as streetview passers by. Talk to your neighbors and then the whole street is blurred like my old street.

    This does not obviate the need for action at the legislative level. Google has used the streetview cars to collect plates and radio signals including WiFi information, who knows what else. They have so many databases of information on each of us to sell to adverts and to give freely to police.

    This opt out is a positive, likely carved out by litigation, in a very very negative space for privacy rights.

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      This opt out is a positive, likely carved out by litigation, in a very very negative space for privacy rights.

      It’s not, it’s less than Google used to do for these requests. In 2009, I requested my house be taken off streetview. They removed it by skipping mine and a few houses on each side.

      Then they went down my back lane, so everyone got a good look at my back yard anyway.

      Privacy today is a never ending battle, but Google started this nonsense a long time ago.

  • bampop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    This is such a backwards-ass way to do things. I built my house using extra large bricks so it would be pixelated to begin with