• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is most likely fake.

    If this was automated, a company automating rejection emails would never write the reason for rejection. It would be a vague excuse like “not a good fit for the role”.

    If this was not automated, then no recruiter would be this stupid.

  • spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you’re in the US and can afford it, Talk to a lawyer.

    This is blatant discrimination of a immutable attribute which is a Civil Rights violation.

    This is written evidence to that fact.

    • candle_lighter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I really hope OP goes through with the lawsuit because of how funny it is. I want to see it make big news

    • ddkman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is why I assume this must be fake. Because even a trainee HR employee would look at that email, and not send it out.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    That is probably a slam dunk (minor) discrimination lawsuit. Your circumstances of birth, including the date, are not something you can be judged for.

    Follow up with your ID or Birth certificate and ask “Excuse me?”

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      It wouldn’t get anywhere in the US. Age is the closest protected class, but only applies to over 40 in the US. Discrimination based on month and day of birth isn’t actually illegal.

      • Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I honestly think there’s a gray area here and it’s worth talking to a lawyer if anything. There are certainly some protections for peoples under 40. Being denied a promotion because you’re “too young” is certainly a protection. The catch is you have to prove it.

        This case is easy to prove though if there are any laws over this.

        Edit: but now that I think about it, this is only really a protection if you’re already hired at the place. If you just slam the door on people before they can get in, discrimination seems to be legal.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    What always ticks me off beyond reason in mails like these is the “we genuinely appreciate your time and effort in…”

    Fuck. You. With. An. Umbrella.

    You don’t appreciate shit, you’re full of shit, yet you’re too shit to even just say what you really want to say: fuck you, we don’t give a damn. Because being actually honest might also be bad and cost money.

    Companies like there are the worse and should all burn in hell

    • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.websiteOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Now I’m imagining someone legitimately putting their Jan6 involvement on a resume.

      Window Structural Integrity Tester (Jan 6th, 2021): Responsibilities included - unconventional team-building activities, conditioning, navigating unfamiliar territory, and breaking down barriers.

  • Hotchillipotato@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I fucking despise the fact that AI almost exclusively is responsible for throwing out 99% of all resumes before they reach a human being

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The problem isn’t AI the problem is brainless humans who configured the AI.

      AI isn’t going to become skynet and take over the world unless someone tells it to. In which case the human is the problem.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This can’t be real. There are so many red flags this is fake. 1) Everything is censored. 2) GIS (Google image search) lookup only shows reddit and linkedin. The linkedin post is just as vague “learned a colleague received this!” 3) It’s too good to be true. it plays on current fears. 4) It’s just so dumb.

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago
      1. Of course everything is censored, there is no reason to share personal info like that.

      2. I don’t know what Geographical Information Systems have to do with this post, are you referring to a reverse image search like google or tineye or something? What were you expecting to find? The original email with all of the aforementioned personal info? Are you surprised content could be posted to Reddit before anywhere else?

      3. Current fears are justified.

      4. Poe’s Law tells me not to assume anything is satirical because there will always be people that stupid or greedy.

      And yeah, it could be fake, 100%, but your arguments were really dumb.

      • rallatsc@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        GIS might be Google Image Search in this case, though I haven’t seen it abbreviated like that before.

    • Voyajer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      1 is in no way a red flag, don’t put other’s personally identifying information on the Internet.

    • orphiebaby@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I fucking hate people like you.

      “Everything on Reddit/Lemmy is fake and gay. Here’s my evidence.”

      All evidence easily has an explanation, most of it laughably so.

      What do idiots who claim everything is fake get out of it? To troll the OP? Or do you just want to spread your misery?

  • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Under GDPR you have a right for your application to be reviewed by a human rather than an automated rejection. Is there something like that in the country maybe?

      • kattenluik@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You could’ve done a simple search, or even write your comment in a way where you don’t state it as a fact but instead you’re now blatantly wrong.

  • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Honestly, they might even consider it fortunate that the company showed them it’s cards now and not when they’re their actual employer. Dodged a bullet.