Air Canada appears to have quietly killed its costly chatbot support.

  • guyrocket@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Surprised Air Canada’s lawyers had the bravado to make claims like this. So glad they lost, I hope this becomes precedent for anything similar.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sad commentary when your company’s chatbot is more humane than the rest of the company … and fired for it.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    As usual, corporations want all of the PROFIT that comes with automation and laying off the human beings that made them money for years, but they also fight for none of the RESPONSIBILITY for the enshittification that occurs as a result.

    No different than creating climate change contributing “externalities,” aka polluting the commons and walking away because lol you fucking suckers not their problem.

    • jettrscga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I smell a new “AI insurance” industry! Get a nice new middle man in there to insure your company if your AI makes a mistake.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Experts told the Vancouver Sun that Air Canada may have succeeded in avoiding liability in Moffatt’s case if its chatbot had warned customers that the information that the chatbot provided may not be accurate.

    So why would anybody use a chatbot?

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Customers are forced to. Companies would rather give shitty and inaccurate information with the veneer of helping someone rather than pay a human to actually help someone.

      They will continue using chatbots as long as they think it won’t cost them more in lost customers or this sort of billing dispute than it saves them in not paying people. What was this, $600? That’s fuckall compared to a salary. $600 could happen a few hundred times a year and they’d still be profiting after firing some people.

      It’s off for now, but it will return after the lawyers have had a go at making the company not liable for the chatbot’s errors.

  • TDCN@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    What i find most stupid about all of this is that Air Canada could just have admitted a mistake, payed The refund of ~450 USD which is basically nothing to them. It would have waisted no one’s time and made good customer service and positive feedback. Then quietly fix the AI in the background and move on. Instead they now spend waaayy more money on legale fees, expensive lawyers, employees sallery, have a disabled AI, customer backlash and bad press all costing them many hundreds of thousands of dollars. So stupid.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      payed

      Paid. Something something “payed” is only for nautical rope or something.

      waisted

      Wasted. Something something “waisted” is only for dressmaking or something.

      I can’t remember the details of what that bot says, but it is something along these lines. I am not a bot, and this action was performed manually. Cheers!

      • TDCN@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thanks. I do know tho, but im slightly dyslexic and English is not my first language so it’s hard for me to catch my own mistakes, while I can easily see it when others are making it. Also autocorrect is a blessing and a curse for me sometimes.

        • arefx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Even best selling authors make these mistakes, most people don’t have an editor proof reading their off the cuff reddit/lemmy comments.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Dual_Sport_Dork’s Ironclad Law Of AI Productivity: The amount of effort you must expend on ensuring that the unsupervised chatbot is always producing accurate results is precisely the same amount of effort you would expend doing the same work yourself.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    No chat or didn’t give misleading information. It acted on the companies behalf and gave truthful information that the company didn’t agree with. Too flippin bad companies. You deploy robots to fulfill the jobs of humans, then you deal with the consequences when you lose money. I’m glad you’re getting screwed by your own greed, sadly it’s not enough.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      A lot of the layoffs are due to AI.

      Imagine when they find out it’s actually shit and they need to hire the people back and they ask for a good salary. They’ll turn around again asking their gouvernements for subsidies or temporary foreign workers saying no one wants to work anymore.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d love if there were some sort of salary baseline that companies are required to abide before asking for staffing handouts. “We’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas!”