The graph only shows that eventually 15 % of the population do T4T, not that it is the best or whatever?

So what about actual pictures that were printed? 3D models someone printed?

Anyway, for most maps we should get pretty close. But the game is not getting any younger. The older it gets, the fewer still care/play, the fewer could restore the game.

There are still videos etc.

Any reasonable person knew that? What…?

I love how you mix in the Idiocracy quotes :D

I can only hope that this was generated instead of actually typed by someone.

Wrong thread?

“If you try hard you might find arguments for my side”

What kind of meta-argument is that supposed to be?

So the ads are the problem? Do you have a link to such an ad?

So many arguments… Wow!

“I can calculate powers with decimal values in the exponent and if you can not do that on paper but instead use these machines, your calculations are worthless and you are not an engineer”

You seem to fail to see that this new tool has unique strengths. As the other guy said, it is just like people ranting about Wikipedia. Absurd.

You know what… now that you say it, it really is just like the anti-Wikipedia stuff.

What? No. Instead we would be able to see steady increases of say 10 % per year as a straight line instead of this, where it appears to be ever larger increases and the first ones essentially invisible.

How could I blindly trust anything in this context?

Why is the graph not logarithmic? Urgh

Ahahahahahhaha what?

This is really a non-issue, as the LLM itself should have no problem at setting a reasonable value itself. User wants a summary? Obviously maximum factual. He wants gaming ideas? Etc.

Rare that people here argument for LLMs like that here, usually it is the same kind of “uga suga, AI bad, did not already solve world hunger”.

Especially after the open source release of DeepSeak… What…?

Nonsense, I use it a ton for science and engineering, it saves me SO much time!