![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/a491cc5f-fa6b-402c-af4c-7f6ae4c276da.webp)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Just because it might be legal to violate copyrights in other countries doesn’t make the code considered open source though lol.
Professional developer and amateur gardener located near Atlanta, GA in the USA.
Just because it might be legal to violate copyrights in other countries doesn’t make the code considered open source though lol.
Yesssss, so true. Anytime people say they want history to be “clean” I insist they explain what they mean because more often than not they’re going to suggest something that makes the history way less useful.
Any standard that wastes valuable space in the first line of the commit is a hard sell. I don’t see the point in including fix/feat/feat! just for the sake of “easy” semantic versioning because generally you know if the next release is going to be major or minor and patches are generally only only after specific bugs. Scanning the commits like this also puts way too much trust in people writing good commit messages which nobody ever seems to do.
Also, I fucking hate standards that use generic names like this. It’s like they’re declaring themselves the correct choice. Like “git flow”.
And then my team squashes those commits 😩
You’re being obtuse. I get the point you’re trying to make – you’ve been heard. I’m just saying those aren’t the terms you should be using to make it. Open source has a very distinct definition and it has to do with the licenses covering the code. It has nothing to do with whether different countries have differing laws. Code cannot be open source in one country and not open source in another because the definition has nothing to do with countries. In fact, that would specifically not be open source because it gives rights to some and not others.
If someone infringes on a copyright that doesn’t mean the work isn’t copyrighted. You can’t just say things that are source available are open source. Even if someone is infringing on the rights holders they’re still only source available.
Open source doesn’t mean source available. You simply aren’t using the term correctly.
Please don’t muddy the water with terms like this. Something is open source if and only if it has an open source license.
Don’t forget that “open source” has a different definition than “source available”.
while nearly no one is complaining about MS using github to train their copilot LLM,
Lots of people complained about that. I’ve only seen this single thread complaining about this.
I know. Just the “full-stack meta frameworks” part alone makes any ADHD person feel nausea.
??? Please don’t make weird blanket statements like this.
Oh, does it still skip ads and stuff?
I believe it was my 2021 taxes (meaning I filed in 2022). Think I still have a shot? I don’t remember how much it was but it was definitely more than zero.
Wish I’d known this. One year we forgot one of our W2s.
It just tells me to sign in to confirm I’m not a bot
Edit: changing instances fixed this
I don’t think I realized f droid didn’t need a rooted phone. Thanks for this comment!
Honestly, Steam’s UI still needs some work. A better way to control what games get auto updates comes to mind. Also, Library and Downloads not being different tabs is odd because I click Library expecting to see my Library but I see downloads.
I distinctly remember when I decided Steam was best. I hated it and bought Borderlands (the original) through some other service. My friends got an update through Steam and I didn’t get it for a long time. The patch from the official website only worked for the physical edition.
🙄