• 8 Posts
  • 1.36K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 3rd, 2024

help-circle








  • I played E.T. relatively recently to remind myself what the fuss was about.

    The game plays fine (with average Atari bugginess).

    It just stands out as an early huge miss for a movie tie in. Almost nothing about the game feels like the movie, or is particularly anything a fan of the movie would seem likely to enjoy.

    I say “almost” because the exploring kind of fits. The same exploring that is constantly frustratingly interrupted by pit falls.

    It’s really not that bad of a game, though.


  • I’d argue Superman 64 for the N64 is a worse game by all measures.

    I’ve spent some unfortunate time with both, and can confirm. Superman 64 is worse by a pretty large margin.

    E.T. is genuinely playable, after a needlessly awful learning curve. Superman 64 still continues to suck even for (shudder) players who have put in the necessary time to learn to play it.

    Edit: As others have said before: E.T. is a decent game, it’s just a lousy choice for an E.T. tie-in.

    Fans of a beloved highly polished film masterpiece about gentle communication and wide eyed exploration discovered the Atari game was a nearly unfinished punishing high stress race against a merciless clock - which frequently abruptly ended any aspiration a player had of discovering anything beyond the same pit they fell into many times before.





  • I agree it’s a stupid theory.

    But of course, if I designed the simulation, I don’t have to actually simulate any of the complex bits, I just have to alter each simulated person to remember successfully observing the results of the complex bits.

    Edit: Of course, my solution breaks the infitine chain of nested worlds anyway. I don’t have to simulate infitine nested worlds in my simulation’s computers - I just simulate a small believable set of memories of having done so. So even those infitine nested worlds are just paper cutouts of the real thing.

    I guess either way, I don’t spend infitine processing power, so the average person has a 50/50 chance of being inside or outside the top level simulation.

    Edit 2: But ironically, each person has 100% chance of believing that they are taking part in an infinite set of nested simulated worlds - if my simulated memories are believable enough.