They voted for this…

Yeah… it only improves life quality… nobody wants that…

I wouldn’t call you ignorant for not knowing information from some arcane document over x years old from a European country.

Why not? I almost certainly would be ignorant about it. Ignorant just means I don’t know something… there’s all kinds of things that I don’t know.

The U.S. 1st amendment actually does have some implications for your speech even though you’re in Europe and (presumably) not a U.S. citizen.

Your questions aren’t horrible and the do have actual answers. However, your tone suggest that you don’t actually give a fuck so it’s not worth wasting time answering them. Let me know if you were actually being genuine…

I really don’t care

Are you sure? You’d fit right in with a lot of proudly ignorant Americans… “Duh… I don’t know which I’ll proudly declare a badge of honor and commit to remaining stupid.”

Fair - added a note to my comment. Thank you.

You switched gears in the middle of your statement. Either photography from the public spaces is legal or it isn’t. The only reason I don’t consider these take-downs a first-amendment violation is because Google is providing the mechanism to do it. They legally have every right to take the picture of your house and tell you to go pound sand if you don’t like it.

Yes and some people would do away with the 1st amendment right to public photography entirely. That doesn’t make it right…

Everyone does know that the front of your house is visible from the street, right?

Nice one, Jesse… you can’t be taken seriously.

I don’t know… what are you going to call them?

un-possible!

We would tell you, but you really shouldn’t know…

If you have the money to spend, then probably yes.

To be bigger than reddit will require bringing over all of the worst fuckwits of reddit. Let’s not do that.

Both scenarios occur

True

I don’t think it’s [not] reasonable to say this “strongly” suggests one in particular.

Disagree. He had a choice to either hear that she was experience pain/duress or that she’s exaggerating and/or misunderstanding. In either case, if he truly cares about her then he could/should seek to understand, communicate, and (if appropriate) compromise. That he immediately dismissed her and only talked of himself makes it clear that he’s an uncaring narcissist.

I appreciate that you want to give him the benefit of the doubt. Narcissists depend on this. When they show you who they are, believe them.

If one is too shallow to understand that ‘video games’ is a stand-in for a much broader problem, leave them. They are either really fucking stupid, a narcissist, or both.

Narcissist for being the abuser, not giving a fuck about her, and making it all about himself.

One would assume, since the guy in this case couldn’t hear the message at all, that the guy didn’t hear the prior attempts to be more nuanced.