I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I mean, considering how many incels voted for trump, I think we’re pretty much already there. Many of the young men who voted red this election already have no close relationships with any women their age. Obviously women should exercise their autonomy as they see fit. I don’t expect it to change how anyone votes.

    I’ll probably be downvoted for this, but progressives have spent the last several years actively shutting down lines of communication with men, particularly white men. For the best of reasons, sure, but it hasn’t been an effective strategy for winning elections.

    Maybe this would sway some group of center-left men who didn’t bother voting, but realistically I expect it will have no effect on the ongoing polarization, or exagerrate it.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    So, creating a massive headache for government ~15-20 years into the future?

    Or what is the point?

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Everyone in here arguing against 4b need to take a look in the mirror. The fact that so many of you are trying push against it is in itself a demonstration of why it’s necessary. Respecting bodily autonomy does not have to be hard.

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Bodily autonomy is the ability to choose 4b, not the reason to do so. Folks arguing against 4b have not disrespected the ability to do 4b. Therefore bodily autonomy is still respected.

        • Ponchy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          “It’s over internet commenter! I have portrayed you negatively in a meme, showing you as the naive you are”

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yes, posting a message on the internet while violating nobody’s personal space or rights is exactly the same as that picture. You did it! You won the internet! You can go away now.

          Go away

          Now

          • JCPhoenix@beehaw.org
            shield
            M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 hours ago

            FYI, you’re on Beehaw. Please be(e) nice. I know it’s crazy times right now, I get it, but we do want folks to still abide by our rules and such here. Thanks.

            • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 hours ago

              While it took several minutes to find your rules, your “spirit of the rules” document specifically identifies what I did as positive: regardless of the other user fake following the rules the spirit of their post was extremely negative and portrayed the other commenter in a false rude light, which I immediately called him out on and asked him to leave. This is a paradox of intolerance situation and you seem to be on the side of intolerance which I’m not a fan of since your bee nice philosophy appears to be explicitly against it.

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Cute, the assumption that meme makes is that it’s clear the gal doesn’t want to participate in the conversation due to body language.

          There’s none of that when you’re commenting in a public politics community. You’re not posting in a community for 4b, for example. Additionally, you’re the one that made the initial comment.

  • Alienmonkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The no marriage part is interesting, the rest carries more unintended collateral.

    As a movement, removing the institutional component would affect the wider group, and their wallets.

  • InevitableList@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It’s interesting that the response to men going their own way (MGTOW) is indifference or at most pity whilst WGTOW are met with hostility.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Mgtow was not met with indifference. They’ve been consistently criticized since the movement first started, and they quickly evolved into a cabal of Nazi-adjacent freaks. Fuck those guys.

      There may be some good that could come from a men’s movement for self actualization and improvement, but mgtow sure as shit wasn’t that

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      MGTOW should be indifferent, but they kinda got hijacked into another red pill BS place. Their lives revolve around hate for women and not actually going your own way and finding what makes you content.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      By percentage, but the total birthrate would (continue to) go down.

      And now Trump’s gonna make it harder to immigrate, so the population may actually start nosediving.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, others have portrayed that as the goal here.

        I just feel like I wouldn’t feel particularly attached to the fate of a country raised by brainwashing conservative families anyways, so it’s a scorched earth approach. Yes, you’ve broken the system, and it can be remade now, but those doing the remaking likely won’t carry your values…

    • femtech@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Not more kids by total but more kids by %. But it won’t be enough to keep the old people and economy in its current state alive.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Is a future dominated by kids raised by these families one worth going through all this effort for?

        As I mentioned in another comment, one of the conservatives I know put their kid in a captain America outfit yesterday cuz he was “defending America”.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                The system which is made up of a bunch of kids raised in brainwashed conservative households.

                I feel like this is, in part, voluntarily abstaining from passing your values down to the next generation, which night not have the intended effect.

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It won’t matter when abortion is illegal and rape goes unpunished.

    The future is hell for everyone.

  • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, and men who support women’s right. Need to support this as well.

    Seriously, look at recent events in Texas. Having sex with women while republicans are in power. It is a potential death sentence for those women.

    Unless you can groove beyond doubt, one off you is infertile. And honestly, given the way some republicans are. Only trust your own eyes on the microscope when checking. Because forcing doctors to lie to women is far from beyond some of these people.

    Honestly, leaving the US for a more liberal nation is the only safe option the way things are looking.

  • Eggyhead@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This just makes “incels”, who are known to be too intellectually inadequate to get a clue. I wouldn’t put it past them to vote away your right to say no first.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Given that the new agenda is to end birth control, no-fault divorce and spousal rape laws, a lot of women are about to have no say past the first one. Don’t get married, and if you’re in a bad marriage try to get out ASAP.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        So what happens when we have a generation of kids almost entirely raised by the 44% of women who voted for Trump into brainwashy conservative families? I already see enough 5 year olds attending trump boat parades and the such to give me concern. A conservative I know dressed their kid up as Capt America yesterday because they were “defending America” after the election.

        Seems like it’d suck if an entire generation was raised in these families.

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          So it’d hasten Idiocracy? Kinda a IBDYBD problem I suppose.

          Seriously though, I think the key would be to drive enough engagement with this so that this in combination with the obvious financial hardships that everyone’s facing completely annihilates the birth rate.