A very cool write-up and breakdown of Signal’s expenses

  • moreeni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    Most of the cost from not moving from requiring phone to be connected to people’s accounts and not desiring for the central server to federate with others.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      And their bullshit excuse for dropping SMS support.

      “It was too expensive from an engineering standpoint”. Nonsense, Android handled it, your app merely reads and writes to the SMS database via an API.

      Or are you telling me the free SMS apps like Handcent, QuickSMS, etc, had a massive engineering team?

      This is when I stopped using Signal, when this lie was so blatant, I can no longer trust them.

      • brrt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Old man yelling at clouds

        SMS is a dead technology as it should be. It’s not private or secure in any way and the apps you listed probably just don’t give a fuck about implementing it in a way that is.

        If Signal had just 1 person working on keeping it alive it would still be money that could be spent elsewhere. Like the username feature I had been patiently waiting for, which was delivered recently and is a great addition.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    This is from one year ago. But not like they wouldn’t need money this year.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      This is consipiracism-adjacent.

      It’s E2E encryption and the source code is public. Uniquely, the E2EE includes the social graph.

      They’ve got money from a bunch of people and organizations, That’s also all public. As for any organization, to have a wide variety of stakeholders with different interests is the best possible guarantee of independent.

      But I agree that the ideal destination is to fully federate the protocol.

      • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        The point was not in the e2e aspect though, but rather in the metadata since everything goes through the same place.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Yes but the difference with every other messenger is that they can’t even see who your message is going to. Due to E2E encryption of contact data.

          What remains is the phone number issue. Verifying a phone number is by far the simplest and most effective way to prevent abuse, which is obviously a major issue with any messenger. There’s no reason to disbelieve them when they this is the reason for it.

          So: yes, they know who their users are individually. But they cannot know who is talking to who, let alone what is being said.

      • The client source code is public the messages are fine but the metadata is whats just as valuable. They do have an implementation of sealed sender but ive heard people say its not perfect against if the signal servers where malicious (btw said servers are not open source).

        $1 from the cia funding it is $1 too much.

        They could kill all the conspiracy theories instantly by federating and said theories will kill people adopting it. The longer they take the more sus it gets.

        • maniajack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Or you could dev up your own perfect solution and show them how easy it is to get funding to do it, show us all

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          ive heard people say

          So, literal hearsay.

          its not perfect against if the signal servers where malicious (btw said servers are not open source).

          The server is centralized so it’s irrelevant whether it’s open source or not, we have no means of checking.

          $1 from the cia funding it is $1 too much.

          Seems you’re referring to initial funding from the Open Technology Fund. That’s a US government body that promotes technologies that undermine authoritarian regimes. Signal fits the bill perfectly. In any case that was a decade ago. Since then there has been far more money from various do-gooding individuals and foundations. In particular the Freedom of the Press Foundation, which (I just checked) is vouched for by various whistleblowers including Edward Snowden. So, hardly a stooge of US imperialism.