• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yeah, I’ve been meaning to switch to OpenStreetMaps for a while now and this was the impetus to drop what I was doing and download it immediately. Fuck Google. So sick of this mask off tech plutocracy bullshit.

    Edit: I’ve tried it a few times yesterday and today, and I like it. Works with Android Auto in my car, guidance voice isn’t annoying, directions are accurate. Only complaint is I’m not sure how to search up a business and have the app map me to the nearest location. I need to dig deeper and figure out if I just haven’t found it yet.

    I would 100% drop GMaps if I could hit the directions button on a Google search and have it bring up OSM instead. Google Maps has been bugged for me for years and the maps app never gets the address from a browser search. I have to search for the business or address in the maps app itself for it to work.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        The discussion seems to be focused around possibly waiting for one or more governing bodies to rule on the name change, or just going along with it and adding an alternate text for people who would prefer the old one, which I think is way more democratic than anything Trump had in mind when signing this XO.

        I certainly prefer this over the blind deference that Google seems to have for an executive order that is functionally just direction to the state department and not legally binding in any way whatsoever.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Well the openstreetmap community aren’t employed by a bunch of hacks perching on a tower of cardboard held together by a failing scheme of duck tape that nobody left after all the layoffs and enshittification knows how to repair, so that makes sense : )

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    For what it’s worth, this is how Google maps has always worked. Use Google maps in China and you’ll notice that borders are in different places, HK, Tibet Bhutan, the whole China sea, those are within China’s borders. It’s the same with Russia, crimea is just part of Russia if you use Google maps in Russia. If your country recognizes different borders or different names for places, that’s what Google shows you in your country. It’s basically either that or they can’t operate in that country, so they don’t really have a choice if they want to exist in that region.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Well yeah, as of 6 years ago, after China invaded with military force, HK has been recognized as part of China on all maps. But Google showed it as part of China even before then.

        And then yeah, I just remembered the wrong name, it was the border of Tibet/Bhutan that are in dispute, so parts of Bhutan display as Chinese territory.

        Thanks for catching that.

        • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          HK was handed back to PRC in 1997, there was a ceremony and everything. Just because it was stolen by the British for sometime doesn’t mean it isn’t Chinese. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handover_of_Hong_Kong

          A border dispute between Bhutan and China isn’t something exceptional, Wikipedia has a list of border disputes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_territorial_disputes your country might have some of its own

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I never said it was exceptional, quite the opposite, I’m saying many countries have border disputes.

            Interesting that you don’t seem to care about my other examples, Gaza or Crimea. Got a soft spot for China?

            • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              What a weird response. I was addressing your comment. You didn’t mention Palestine -all of it is Palestine FYI, Israel is just another Crusader state- and Crimea should be returned to the Crimean Tatars, both Slavic peoples are invaders.

              But no, you would rather play the Sinophobia and Yellow Perilism card and assume that I receive Xi bucks. What a day! I didn’t mention my own country’s border disputes with its neighbors either! Didn’t see it necessary to educate you on the matter.

              • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                What a weird response. I was addressing your comment. You didn’t mention Palestine.

                Oh whoops, it must have been a different post in this thread that I mentioned Gaza.

                you would rather play the Sinophobia and Yellow Perilism card and assume that I receive Xi bucks.

                I’ve said nothing of the sort. That sounds like deflection.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I support this.

      But we should probably at least have a conversation with Mexico about it, since something like half of their country borders it. IDK, I failed geography.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So why didn’t they change Crimea to be part of Russia, if that’s always been the longstanding policy, Google?

    (Note; I’m not suggesting it is a part of Russia; just pointing out the hypocrisy of Google since Trump claiming ownership of the Gulf of Mexico is the same thing as Russia claiming ownership of Crimea.)

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They did (in Russia). There’s no hypocrisy here. Just blanket compliance with local authority.

      The maps look different when viewed in different regions, this becomes apparent whenever there’s contested territory, like crimea, the China sea, Gaza. We only see the maps that our local government approves.

  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Here google. It’s correct here. Nothing to change.

    E: i love the DV, denying geography lol

    • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I know it’s not deliberate, but phrases like ‘spineless pussies’ are why women don’t feel welcome on lemmy.

      Is lemmy truly a left-leaning platform? Or is it yet another tech-bro circlejerk that cares more about the aesthetics of inclusivity? You all can’t have your cake and it eat it too.

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    https://www.openstreetmap.org/

    https://f-droid.org/packages/app.organicmaps/ or https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps

    Organic Maps is a free Android & iOS offline maps app for travelers, tourists, hikers, and cyclists. It uses crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap data and is developed with love by the community. No ads, no tracking, no data collection, no crapware. 
    

    https://f-droid.org/packages/net.osmand.plus/ or https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand

    This project aims at providing comfortable map viewing and navigation (routing) application for mobile devices. Particular stress lies with complete offline features (via pre-loaded offline map data) or economic internet usage.
    

    https://apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/apk/akylas.alpi.maps or https://github.com/Akylas/alpimaps

    Alpi Maps is a map application to help you prepare and enjoy your hike! Get all the info you need before you go, then enjoy all the data offline during your hike.
    
    • mortimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      3 days ago

      I used Organic Maps on my CalyxOS phone a few days ago to navigate a 200 mile car drive home to the Scottish Highlands, and it worked flawlessly. The first 50 miles were through parts of Fife that I was not familiar with. I left it on for the rest of the journey just to track my progress and test it out. Very impressed with it. Maps are detailed and downloaded to the device for offline use. I’ve finally managed to deGoogle my life completely and will never use another Google product or service again.

        • mortimer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I have my own website account for personal stuff, and all the other stuff that was going to my Gmail account is being redirected now to Disroot.org where I’m slowly changing the address over for each mail that comes in. I know Disroot is probably not the best, but it was free, had POP3 and IMAP support (I use IMAP on my phone and POP3 on my desktop) and it’s not used for anything too important.

    • hash@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hijacking this to plug contributing to OSM. Improving your local area is very rewarding and can pair well with some youtube binging. Take a look at your city and see if there are things you’re interested in working on.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Except when it is frustrating and continually tries to send you through tiny “technically paved” service roads so you know anyone unfamiliar to the area would risk car damage because there is no way to mark a road as “low priority” or “only use if you live on that road”.

        Street complete is very awesome though! Especially for updating local businesses.

          • goldfndr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            BRouter and other routing engines can use attributes like surface and smoothness (and probably width) to calculate routes.

        • goldfndr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Are you referring to smoothness=bad or a narrow width? (I’m guessing you’ve been using StreetComplete to specify each.)

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Holy shit, I never found smoothness in the OSM editor. Does that actually effect routing priority?

            That might be a game changer for making my local area much better on OSM.

        • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s especially fun for those of us on motorcycles. I found a particularly horrible road to ride a sport touring bike on several years ago and would have loved this feature on osm.

      • ick@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I am using Magic Earth for navigation. Any recommended companion iOS apps for contributing to OSM?

        • goldfndr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Possibly not “companion” per se, but Every Door is available for iOS and MapComplete can run in browser. Go Map!! can provide more detailed editing.

        • SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          For anyone wondering “where do they get their money?”

          It’s from businesses who buy their SDK. They (allegedly) don’t sell any of your data

          Magic Earth is free for all our end-users but we also have a paid Magic Earth SDK for business partners. For instance Selectric.de (a supplier for navigation solutions for ambulances and fire trucks), Smarter AI (developing ADAS systems) or Absolute Cycling (using the platform on bicycles). For more info on the SDK, you can check magiclane.com.

          Bottom of their faq

          I haven’t been able to test it out yet, but it seems pretty decent

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Magic Earth is proprietary, though. You can believe their privacy policy, but I have trouble believing any privacy policy if I can’t see the source code.

        • bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Actually I think this is a pretty common thing. I know several people who use iPhones and other Apple products specifically to avoid the google alternatives.

    • joostjakob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      OpenStreetMap also needs to deal with this kind of thing. In this case, several people already tried to add it to the map in some form of other, but generally not as something to actually be shown. There is a looong discussion about it here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571 . General opinion is that it is (or will be) “the official name that the US says it has”. In OSM you can invent tags for anything, so an object can have many names. Done like this, anyone using the data can still choose to give precedence to any “official US names that are not in common use yet”. Later it may be upgraded ased on if it becomes a common alternative name, just in the US, or maybe beyond. All those options can have their own special tag. And only very motivated data users will ever show it to map users. But if you do a search for Gulf of America, you will be able to find it.

    • misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Why? Google does this everywhere because naming is completely arbitrary and it makes sense to be up to date with current nomenclature. Poland changed name of Kaliningrad (Russian exclave that we border) to Królewiec (what it was called when it was part of Poland) in a similar manner to troll Russians and Google updated our maps as well. Apple didn’t in either case so you have options.

      • Alex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        iirc it was not just to troll rusians, it was because it was found kalinin was a murderous psycho killing a lot of poles for the red army.

      • Etterra@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Two reasons. Firstly, it’s the principle of the thing - fuck Google for sucking up to Orange Shitler. Secondly, because somebody, somewhere in Google gets to deal with the endless reporting - even if all that reaction is is to have to write a script to auto-ignore that exact thing because it keeps popping up and there’s nothing they can do to stop it.

        • misk@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Why would Google make an exception to their global policy? Is it because America is special?

        • misk@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Following whatever is the official version of country names and even country borders based on user location has been the thing for many years now. Google probably doesn’t care and doesn’t make the exception for the US.

  • Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pathetic. Hopefully the rest of the world doesn’t follow suit. Renaming it just for one of Trump’s ego trips is not a good reason.

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      The rest of the world obviously will not follow suit, but foreign companies selling maps in the US will have to comply, so it is just another exception that need to be handled. Naming and boundary disputes between countries have existed for years, and map makers just make enough versions to satisfy every country.

      • Australis13@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Actually, I’m unclear on that point - do foreign companies actually have to comply, or is it just limited to government communications and government-published maps (e.g. the USGS, etc.)?

        • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Only if the maps will be accessed from the US or sold in the US, and only for the US. This is my understanding of it anyways, the coming days will reveal more

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Surely I am allowed to sell fictional maps? If I can sell a map of Middle-Earth, I can sell a map of a fictional world where a Gulf of Mexico exists.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      They all bend the knee. Just wait until the persecution of political opposition becomes a thing.

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        Has nothing to do with bending the knee. The executive order literally changed the official name of the Gulf in the U.S. This situation is ridiculous, but it is the new U.S. government that you need to complain about, not the people implementing or deferring to their decisions.

        • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Do. Not. Comply.

          Giving in is what gives them the power.

          I absolutely will call out people who think it’s ok to just go along with the new fascist regime.

          • RxBrad@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Obama renamed Mt. McKinley to Denali by executive order. Trump is using executive order to rename it back.

            Biden outlawed oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. Trump used executive order to rename it so the Gulf of Mexico “doesn’t exist”. (EDIT: Actually the naming appears to be unrelated to this. The drilling ban was specifically reversed in a different executive order that reversed several Biden EOs)

            It’s all questionable use of executive order. But which party is going to step up and say “the last guy did it, but our guy shouldn’t be able to ignore checks & balances anymore”?

            • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              3 days ago

              The difference is that it’s intentional waters and the International Hydrographic Organization is in charge of standardizing the names.

              • RxBrad@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                The IHO proposes names which world nations may or may not use.

                Such is the case with the “Southern Ocean” around Antarctica since the early 2000s, which is randomly recognized & not recognized by world nations.

                • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  It still requires Congress to pass legislation. I think they would have to leave the organization entirely or amend the resolution to join it and recognize it’s naming convention. The executive order is illegal.

                • 0x0@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  gilf

                  I’ve heard of MILFs… but i’ve only seen GILFs in Japan. That’s not the geography we’re discussing here.

                • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  A line joining Cape Catoche Light (21°37′N 87°04′W) with the Light on Cape San Antonio in Cuba, through this island to the meridian of 83°W and to the Northward along this meridian to the latitude of the South point of the Dry Tortugas (24°35’N), along this parallel Eastward to Rebecca Shoal (82°35’W) thence through the shoals and Florida Keys to the mainland at the eastern end of Florida Bay and all the narrow waters between the Dry Tortugas and the mainland being considered to be within the Gulf.

            • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 days ago

              Biden outlawed oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. Trump used executive order to rename it so the Gulf of Mexico “doesn’t exist”.

              I’d be very surprised if all laws/treaties cease to exist if you just rename the “counterparty”/location. Declare Mexico to be named South Texas, and laws no longer apply there?

              • RxBrad@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Probably true.

                But until a court actually steps up to say it, it’s the Wild West out there. And as soon as this gets shot down, another executive order will get wedged back in there to keep the rigs drilling.

                EDIT: Apparently the naming had nothing to do with drilling. The drilling ban was already specifically reversed in a different executive order that reversed several Biden EOs

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          International bodies of water tend to be named by… International governing bodies.

          That said, Google’s choices about which country to rely on has… Some real-world ramifications. Like the very… shall we say, “open to interpretation” border between India and Pakistan. Or, China and India’s border.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is super dumb.

    How are these morons so offended about the name of a body of water?

    Their fragile ego is so completely shattered because Mexico “has a Gulf” and they “don’t”? Little men with too much power.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ultimate pettiness, show of power, or misdirection from other, more concerning news.
      Could be all at of those or something entirely different, but it sure is pathetic.

    • DannyMac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s misdirection and makes any laws or regulations specifically mentioning the Gulf of Mexico no longer apply since “tHeRe iSnT a gULf oF mExIcO.”

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Another day another issue that completely doesn’t matter at all to distract from the fact that our politicians are incapable of actually fixing any of our problems.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      incapable of actually fixing

      Or making them worse. He just upped taxes on the lower classes and gave the rich tax breaks… again.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Politicians are more than capable of solving our problems. They’re paid not to.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think you’re overestimating humans. Even if we actually attempted to solve all of our problems I seriously doubt we can. I do wonder how much better things could be though.

        • sudo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I do wonder how much better things could be though.

          What are you talking about? Oligarchs are living their best lives right now. Trump is in office and there is nothing that is not up for sale. If you have big money right now, the US is your oyster. Bend the knee, kiss the ring and grease the palm. You’ll walk away with your own fiefdom. Pay a bit more and he’ll rent an office in the White House.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      politicians are incapable of actually fixing any of our problems.

      They’re not incapable, they just don’t care. They’re your problems after all, not theirs.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There’s little point in doing so, other than the feel-good moment. Google, and all other mapping companies, ultimately take their data from official sources. This differs per country, so users of maps from outside of the US will continue to see Gulf of Mexico, but complaining that it is wrong will only be ignored because they’re following the data from the official US government source.

    • daddy32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      They never fix bugs in maps. Some places IRL even got renamed, because it was easier than fixing the name in google maps.