• AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    While I hate Google, this seems like one of those much ados over nothing. They specifically mention ‘sex, gender, or sexual orientation’, which to most reasonable people would cover gender identity.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, but I think most of the people on Lemmy should know better than that.

        Looks at Hexbear, .ml, and to some extent Blahaj

        Oh, who am I kidding.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      in 42 seconds

      “Gender” means nothing without context. By a MAGAs definition of gender this policy doesn’t protect trans people, for example. We don’t know how this rule will be interpreted in practice. Even if you don’t consider the intent behind making this change, this is objectively a weaker guarantee of protection than what we had with “gender identity and expression”.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    youtube has enshittified for a while, they went downhill as soon as they announced that they no longer backed election denial reports. then all the right wing, anti-woke videos started popping up all over the place, plus the one that try to seem like its both sides videos too.

    allowing people like beast, and others to dominate the front, was asking for trouble.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Stop using youtube.

    EDIT: A lot of people real fuckin triggered by this and looking for any excuse to keep using. Fucking addicts.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      What else has such a catalog? Going to be hard to persuade creators to host their own content with ads and subscriptions.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Most of them are literally Nazis. Anytime I go to youtube and finish a video all the suggested videos to watch after are obscene “anti-woke” trash.

            The youtube to right-wing pipeline is real.

            EDIT:

            Here’s after me watching an old Lightning Bolt music video. Six videos are related to Lightning Bolt, being live videos or music videos, but a solid four videos are all weird right-wing Nazi pipeline shit. One defending Trump and saying he has a plan, one lamenting the pushback against Tesla, one shitting on the new Snow White for being “woke,” and one literally with the giant title “fuck your pronouns.” Plus one old cartoon and an episode of Surrounded with one doctor vs. twenty anti-vax (I am not convinced this Surrounded show actually does anything helpful for any discourse.) I have watch history disabled so none of this comes from my watch history, this is the default that youtube gives to people.

                • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  31
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Well, that might be the cause. Kinda scary you get recommendations like that just due to no history.

                • sasquatch7704@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Funny think about that.

                  I also had it disabled, started watching a longer(ish) video, closed the video and enabled history and somehow YouTube knew how much I already watched before history was on.

                  So my guess is that history off is only for the user, YouTube knows anyway, it just pretends not to store it

            • NotNotMike@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              19 hours ago

              The top right video is a video absolutely dumpstering Tesla and calling it a worthless stock. Your recommendations will also highly depend on what video you were just watching, could it be that users who watch your video also happen to watch these other videos? Is that the platforms fault?

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Weird.
              Mine is just Anime, vtuber, tech (the good kind) and edutainment (e.g. kurzgesagt, real engineering, ezc.).

              Maybe you engage heavily in political content because I mostly avoid it like the plague.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                I have watch history disabled

                Man how many people fail to fucking read this is literally re-enforcing my point that maybe more people need to read. This me, quoting myself, from above. Further, someone else made the same kind of comment over a half hour ago and I responded the same, noting that I had already mentioned that I have watch history disabled, so Youtube does not and cannot give me recommendations based on my watch history.

                I actually almost never watch Youtube except for the odd video game trailer or random comedy-shit-post-snippet. I don’t have any subscriptions or channels I care about. I read.

            • gabbath@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              You’re correct but the “He has a plan” one is from Money & Macro, a leftist (Marxist-friendly) economics channel. He’s trying to explain the broader strategy behind the tariffs, which (from skimming the video) seems similar to a theory Yanis Varoufakis had as well. I think it’s much simpler than that though… I think they’re just a sloppy way to appear tough on the world stage while crashing the economy so the ultrarich can pick up the pieces, but that’s just me.

              Anyway you’re correct about the rest I think. And tbh even one pipeline video in the top recommended is too many.

          • Aphelion@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Nebula doesn’t have that kind of ‘popular’ YouTubers, it’s a creator-made platform that’s more focused on science and documentary channels. I don’t think I’ve seen anything on Nebula even remotely related to gaming.

            • 0k_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 hours ago

              There’s definitely gaming content on there, but what I’ve seen has been of the long-form analysis type.

        • "no" banana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Sadly I couldn’t get it to stream reliably though it’s been a few months since I unsubscribed.

        • Enkrod@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The only way to pay for subscription is with a credit card, no thank you, my culture mostly doesn’t use those and I don’t have or want one.

      • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s not an easy answer, but the best way I’ve found so far is to use GrayJay.

        If I find that one of the content creators I follow on YouTube happen to post their content on any other platform, I switch my subscription to that platform.

        Besides YouTube they support Nebula, Twitch, Odysee, PeerTube, Dailymotion, Bitchute, Kick, BiliBili, Rumble, Patreon, and more.

        • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Some of those, particularly Odysee and Rumble have much worse Nazis. They are the platforms of choice for British National Socialist Movement and Patriotic Alternative.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Not just catalog for viewing. What other platform can I use as cloud storage for video files for free? I have hundreds of hours of stuff uploaded there.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          What other platform can I use as cloud storage for video files for free?

          None. YouTube included.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I mean, I do use YT as cloud storage for free. And before you say the “nothing is free line,” note my other replies.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Nope. The admin of sh.itjust.works lets you use their storage for free. Google does not.

              There are things that are free, Youtube is not one of them.

              • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Okay, as I said in my other replies, the videos are unlisted, not monetized, and I don’t pay for it. What is not free about that?

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Is money is the only thing about yourself that you ascribe value to?

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            18 hours ago

            They are all stored on local hdds, in fact I have two copies locally. I said it’s my cloud storage, my backup off site.

              • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Except I do, because I don’t have off site storage. 3-2-1 my friend. If my house burnt down, without the cloud storage I’d lose everything. Separate local copies is good for defending against disk failure.

                • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  If your data isn’t worth a few bucks to secure maybe it isn’t worth the redundancies in the first place. Keep making excuses and hope they keep allowing you to access your data “for free” or at all.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          What other platform can I use as cloud storage for video files for free?

          If it’s free, you are the product (ad views), not the consumer (ad sales). Suck it up and pay for hard drives.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I have many hard drives, and none of the videos are monetized or even publically listed. As I said, it’s my cloud storage, my offsite backup.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              18 hours ago

              And I’m saying you’re not paying for it, and that’s the problem. Everyone got way too comfortable with getting “free” shit from corporations that would trample our rights the second it became convenient for them.

              • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                If I’m using YT as cloud backup storage for hundreds of hours of video that is unlisted, unmonetized, how am I helping them trample rights?

                • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 hours ago

                  Their ability to trample rights because of how much profit they make from horrible content is directly related to their ability to give you that space for free. “I’m not directly contributing” is a real weak excuse to keep using it, in my personal opinion.

      • lumony@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        We really should be working together to upload content from youtube to peertube instances.

        Don’t ask for permission. Just do it. Civilly disobey.

        • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          And who is going to pay for the bandwidth and storage space on those peertube instances?

          I mean, I too want to get away from YouTube, but it is going to be very difficult to convince people to pay for what YouTube gives away for free.

          • lumony@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            18 hours ago

            The people who set up the instances usually also are responsible for paying to keep them active.

            but it is going to be very difficult to convince people to pay for what YouTube gives away for free.

            I mean, they’re already there. Have you tried using Peertube?

            • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              They are already there, and someone is paying for the storage and bandwidth for what’s already there. Asking for random people to start pulling videos from YouTube and uploading them to someone else’s server is going to very quickly make that server go away.

              And yes, I have tried Peertube. My experience is when I click a Peertube link from Lemmy, 9/10 it is a dead link.

              • lumony@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                18 hours ago

                Gonna have to ignore you, bud.

                Arguing with incompetent people such as yourself is a waste of effort.

                Goodbye.

                • CybranM@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Haha, so many butthurt self-righteous people in this thread.

                  Why are you so toxic? I thought Lemmy was supposed to foster better discussions than Reddit but here you are name-calling and talking down to people.

                  Please consider treating people better in the future

              • lumony@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                18 hours ago

                That’s just the nature of the internet.

                I’m sorry, but I’m going to have to block you now.

                I’ve seen too much incompetence on your part, and I need to stop validating it with responses.

                Goodbye.

        • mesa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I dont think its ok to just rip peoples content without their permission.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Maybe people could read more?

        Nobody needs this endless “content” slop.

        For real people need to get a grip if they can’t survive without it. They’re addicted.

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Horse shit.

          Reading vs TV was a tired debate in the eighties. YouTube is no different than tv. Hell, in some ways, because it isn’t all controlled by oligarchs entirely, I would argue that it’s easier to find good things on YouTube than it ever was on broadcast or cable tv.

          Also, ablist much? How about the blind and dyslexic? Are they fucked just because you don’t like that format?

          Yeah, fuck YouTube as a platform, and fuck Google/alphabet, but don’t pretend to be the arbiter of entertainment.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            How about the blind and dyslexic

            Last I checked braille exists and so do tools for dyslexic readers. There are literally braille terminals for the blind. Hell, the first time I saw one was in the film Sneakers in 1992.

            It’s actually very easily argued that the push to touch-screen and video everything is what is actually ableist and making braille be used far less because companies are more worried about what’s cheap than what is actually useful.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                Yeah, that’s some projection. You weren’t being disingenuous to pretend that videos are more helpful to the blind than braille? Get a grip.

                We’re talking about a company that is happily trampling over the rights of individuals right now, you don’t think the disabled won’t be next on their chopping block?

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Maybe people could read more?

          Hell yeah I love audiobooks /s

        • CybranM@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Hmm yes I’ll just read about how cool two bullets hitting each other in slowmotion looks. Much better experience than watching it /s

        • drre@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          totally agree with reading more. text is easy to consume, easy to store, (somewhat) easy to verify (if sources are provided), and it keeps (if using dead trees for storage). ever since the pandemic i started reading more and must say i really like it

            • monarch@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              What do you think keeps something deep being in the form of audio? I get that videos aren’t great for research but audio can just be written word spoken so that people that can’t read or don’t enjoy reading can experience it. I read more than pretty much anyone that I know in my age range and I don’t see myself as superior because of it and doing some comes across as frankly pomous and self important.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Some content lends itself well to written format. Lots of content does not.

            • drre@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              absolutely agree. i just wanted to point out that not everything has to be a video

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      not just stop, rip every half decent video from there and save it somewhere else. Losing everything in youtube is library of alexandria level loss.

    • Green Wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If as many people as possible self host their own peertube, even for just your own videos, it wouldn’t replace youtube completely, but it would be a giant leap in the right direction.

      • mesa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yep that would be nice! Yunohost can make it pretty easy to install for those of us who self host. Plus this is the fediverse. Totally agree!

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The usual household has nowhere near the upload capacity to meaningfully stream videos.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Even most people hosting at home, which is already an incredibly small bubble, have only the default upload of something like 40Mbit which is more than plenty for internet usage and thus the only thing most providers supply, since people favour download speeds. You usually have to specifically order increased uploads speed, which not enough people do to build something that could serve as an alternative to youtube

            • Green Wizard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Idk what to tell you man, I was just saying it would be cool if more people made a personal Peertube. Didn’t say everyone and their mother needed to make one, just that it would be nice if as many people as possible could make one. Again, I get that it can be hard, or not possible for most people, but if more people could make one, and made one, that would be cool.

    • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Judging a captive market for not being able to break free from a monopoly is just another form of oppression, buddy.

    • Walican132@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Any suggestions where to go? I mostly watch warhammer painting content such as tutorials for techniques I don’t know and video game content either long form retrospectives to fall asleep or guides for what I am playing. I’ve tried to get off YouTube completely but these specific niches are all that’s left for me.

      • UndergroundGoblin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Cant help you with this specific type of content, but you could use Invidious.io to watch YouTube Videos. Still better than nothing. No Google API, No Tracking, no Ads and pre installed SponsorBlock.

        • Walican132@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Thanks. I can def do that on my phone. Don’t know much about how to do it on Apple TVs or Rokus but I very seldom use them for YouTube anymore anyway.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    So, sundar pinchai can be added to the list of CEOs that suck?

    Because a lot of the time, it’s weird that when the company does nasty shit, nobody names him as the head asshole in charge the way that other companies and ceos get handled.

    The dude has been in the driver’s seat for pretty much every major deterioration of Google/alphabet for years.

  • nature_man [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Reposting my comment another post relating to this situation

    I mean this is just them making official how they’ve been acting for 2 years minimum, as much as google and youtube want to act progressive and inclusive, people still get demonetized for talking about lgbtq or women’s issues, unless they are harassing them, in which case the video will stay up no matter how many of youtube’s rules it breaks. For example, trans NB game critic Stephanie Sterling had multiple harassment videos against them (they listed pronouns as they/them last I checked, please correct if changed) that are still up right now, several years after upload, despite those videos exclusively attacking them for being trans/non-binary, which breaks youtube’s TOS

    Companies are not your friend.

      • gabbath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Just don’t make a video criticizing the nazi using snippets of the nazi’s videos, because that’s when you risk getting taken down for hate speech.

        Smaller channels have this happen to them on a regular basis when they criticize bigger channels like, say, Matt Walsh. In that case, it’s because YT likes the bigger channel better for giving more ad revenue, but they still know that it’s hate speech so they apply their own rule selectively… on people criticizing the hate speech. They only ban chuds after they become irrelevant, and that’s only to save face — for example, when they banned Stefan Molyneux he was hardly popular anymore, so there was no financial loss in banning him, and they could score brownie points about how progressive they are.

      • nature_man [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Wish I could say I’m surprised, but I’ve had this exact thing happen to me several times. Sometimes they’ve even had slurs in their profile image or banner too.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    When an influential group of powerful people make hate speech a part of their standard rhetoric, is EXACTLY when you MUST block it on your platform, not a signal that it’s time to start letting it slide, you fucking pricks.

    • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Pichai kissed the ring. He’s colluding with the person who tried to overturn the elections and install himself as a ruler.

      All of the billionaires that were at the inauguration are in the same boat. I’m at a point where I believe the crimes of any of them should be tried and convicted with the punishments being doled out collectively to all colluders, but that’s me.

      I’d be going for the death penalty from the prosecution side, since it seems like that is what we do now to people who cause one or more people to die, no matter how unethical the victim(s) were.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I wonder if Tim Cook is there too. It would make sense for him and Apple to resist this at least somehow but…

  • PerfectDark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And people judged me for watching YouTube with uBlock Origin, or via NewPipe for eons.

    Look who’s laughing now.

    • Trihilis@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Good lord, the amount of idiots that white knighted me for using uBlock.

      “WOULD U WORK FOR FREEEEE???”

      Like fuck off no I wouldn’t. I also dont buy up every other company I see, turn it to shit and then try to force a political agenda through it, and guess who IS doing that using billions of dollars? Yep, Google.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Those aren’t opinions I would care about in the first place. Somebody thinks you should be watching ads? WTF?

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      youtube is too infested with ads, to make me disable ublock origin for my favorite channels. in anycase most of the channels become greedy pos overtime anyways. outside of pet one/animals/stem ones, ones that are just gossip or reaction or like mr beasts videos are no good.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      YouTube on mobile is intolerable these days. NewPipe is the way for Android, though Google is in a constant battle to disable it.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “Don’t Be Evil”

    (I know this hasn’t been the Google motto in years – when it stopped was one of the biggest corporate red flags)

  • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Showing how truly performative their big “ally” push was during the pandemic. All their BLM and diversity support was just as performative. Big corporations are just sycophantic monsters riding trends. Avoid them where possible.

  • ImmersiveMatthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That is why centralized platforms, especially powerful ones, are sitting ducks waiting to become even more corrupt. Why more people are not leaving centralized services is a crime against humanity as it is clear that supporting theme means society suffers.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      The ‘not leaving centralized services’ thing isn’t really helped when there’s basically no other viable alternatives, like is the case with YT. PeerTube exists, sure, but it’s a content desert, sadly.

      Now, if PeerTube had more content to choose from…

      Really though, Reddit, Meta, Twitter, and Discord all have viable decentralized alternatives in the form of Lemmy, Pixelfed, Mastodon (Mastodon serving as an alternative for both Facebook and Twitter), and Matrix respectively, why can’t PeerTube serve as a truly viable decentralized alternative for YT?

      Even Linux is in its glow-up arc as a viable Windows alternative lately ffs, and I’m glad to have been on that bandwagon for years before that platform started gaining mainstream attention.

      • monarch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The big problem with PeerTube(PT) is that there is no advertising. As it stands now people are burning money in order to run a PT instance and YouTube(YT) was not at all profitable for many years so it is unlikely that PT ever will be unless people start being willing to pay for people to upload their content to PT. There are ways that you could make PT profitable but it would end up making it into something more similar to Patreon or Nebula.

        • AkashicOwl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s harder than that IMO. There are plenty alternatives to many bad things but people just don’t care. Just like Linux, for the average person that’s got enough shit to deal with, they don’t wanna add what they perceive like a difficulty and remove comfort by having to start from scratch with less options. Also, being cut from the mainstream trends, and the general social thing.

          Not speaking for me as I’ve been mostly degoogling and demicrosofting, even tho I still partly feeling like that for YouTube that’s been a very valuable part of my life (yes. I do read and go outside. But please stop suggesting that to people in such threads, that’s missing the point), and that I couldn’t let go off yet. Alternatives rn are either totally devoid of content (at least, the one I like), or paid (didn’t gave a shot to Nebula, I’ll browse it and see, but it might be hard to beat both my favorite creators I spent years curating, and the fact that you can find anything on any obscure thing)

    • seeigel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s frightening. Why do people not make an effort to leave Reddit?

      How can the same people run a dictatorship of the proletariat? Even democracy, I don’t see how society as a whole can avoid being manipulated.

  • rob200@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This was bound to happen after the election results just a matter of time. Also, hate speech related content possibly gets a lot of clicks. So capitalism benefits. Next is, possibly but hopefully not, Bluesky’s official server.

      • Trihilis@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I dont trust anything that isn’t fully decentralized. Bluesky is very weird in that regard, its partially centralised. I guess it’s better than Twitter (but that is setting the bar very low). I still refrain from using it too often.

        It will almost certainly have ads in the future and will inevitably go down the path of reddit, twitter and Facebook so I prefer to use something that is completely out of reach of the CEO if something goes to shit.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          We need sites that are decentralized and make clear where their funding comes from. In the end, users need to be prepared to fund the services they use to keep them honest. This is especially true of video which is very expensive to host.

      • rob200@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Hopefully. If Youtube did it, who’s to say now that Bluesky may or may not jump ship? It’s an industry. However, i’m mainly pointing at the main server, other servers on Bluesky might not jump ship so fast, or not at all (ideally).

  • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I hated Google far before it was cool. I would feel vindicated if it weren’t so damn overdue. They don’t even contribute meaningfully to society. And I mean that about EVERYTHING

    Gmail is lame, their search engine sucks, chrome wastes resources, their ads platform ruined the internet, Golang fundamentally sucks, the emulation layer of android is so fucking wasteful, Material Design ruined digital creativity, etc.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        and yet somehow google made it worse. Not only are there more ads than ever before, but now it’s also a panopticon.

    • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Google search feels like it has stopped being the magic it was. Now whenever I search for something I might not find it underneath all the stuff on sale. For the first time in I don’t know how many years I’ve been finding myself using something else like Duck Duck Go.

        • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I used to use Google shopping to find certain items and compare websites. Now the entire left side that used to be a filter list is replaced. When you click a “filter” option it just adds text to the search bar. Then it will include an essay about why these are your options for something and recommend top brands, but then just list everything.

  • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    There is one thing that is vital that is missing from peertube. Effective monetization.

    By watching on peertube I am a drain on resources. A net negative. I’d happily pay to offset those costs and more, but I want it to be shared amongst multiple creators and hosters.

    I don’t want to just support one, I want to support most of the network for the hosting and bandwidth, and a certain amount divided amongst the creators I watch.

    If PeerTube introduces some sort of payment / monetization solution, it might get more creators as well. Without it I can’t see it growing fast enough to compete with YouTube in the near future.

    Well… Sooner or later the costs of Full HD compressed video will be negligible for hosting and bandwidth, so that might be when YouTube gets a real challenge. So I guess we’ll see

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I remember the pre-Youtube internet where we created content because it was fun or educational, not because we needed money for the task of doing so.

      Paying for server costs and maintaining them, sure. MetaFilter has a good system for that, they’re effectively a non-profit and have a donation structure and paid admins and moderators. The rest of the people on the site, they just make good content for the sake of making good content, not because they feel the need to be paid for their time doing it.

      God I miss the pre-Youtube era. “Content creators” looking for a payday via advertising are a fucking cancer.

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I mean, sure but we are past that. No large YouTuber will give up getting paid, and go to a system with a much smaller user base so even stuff like affiliate links and sponsorships are worth less. Basically double lose money just to join peertube. Especially since most large YouTubers have a team of people who they pay, so they cannot afford for their employees sake to take such a large loss just to support peertube.

        More likely this leads to Vimeo, or like twitch TikTok or something else being able to support a normal video platform than it leads to people using peertube.

        • monarch@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I will never understand people who identify as leftist that refuse to understand that under our current economic model people require money to survive and if they do not get money for doing their creative work they might not be able to continue making that work.

          It is not selfish to want to be payed for working on something like a video that in some cases takes hundreds of man hours of work to complete. There is a reason that the quality of content available on youtube has gone up massively. Say what you want about the writing but there is no way that something like helluva boss could ever have been made entirely online before youtube.

          • nyamlae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            It is not selfish to want to be payed for working on something like a video that in some cases takes hundreds of man hours of work to complete

            Yes, it is, if your desire to get paid causes you to remain on corporate-controlled social media, to the detriment of society.

            Not to mention, plenty of people can and do put hundreds of hours of work into projects that they don’t ask for payment for.

            “Content creators” who get paid through advertisements are class traitors whose interests are aligned with the capitalist class. They will fuck over society to make a buck for themselves.

      • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I subscribe to a lot of full time “content creators” that are ad supported and supported via donations.

        I curate my feed meticulously to avoid slop, and I get a lot of value, learning and entertainment from those I follow.

        I believe they deserve to be paid for the tremendous amount of work they put in.

        Some sort of ability to generate a livable wage from creating high quality content seems reasonable, no?

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You can pay them. They can choose to require it. Nobody needs to pay a fucking gestapo in between

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        MetaFilter has a good system for that, they’re effectively a non-profit and have a donation structure and paid admins and moderators.

        MetaFilter has at multiple points been on the verge of shutting down, no? IIRC, you pay $5 for an account.

  • fxdave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I’m not in favor of YouTube, but what exactly missing here?