• catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m finding I’m using youtube less and less that I can’t actually remember the last time I used it for anything. Youtube has so much crap now.

    Because of their monetisation scheme for content creators, it was profitable for creators to drag 15 mins of information out to one hour, and then to include shock faces as thumbs to get more clicks, and then to get more viewers just to watch a bit of the video as viewership dwindles into just mindlessly watching suggestions.

    I feel sorry for those creators who have gone balls deep with youtube content and who have no “plan b”.

    • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I think that says more about the channels you watch and your viewing habits. I enjoy STEM and STEM related channels; I don’t experience the same as what you’ve described.

  • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Oh hey I ran into that issue, fixed it by blocking the element on ublock and spoofing my user agent

    Edit: I put more details under nameisnotimportant’s comment, I was about to head to bed so I didn’t really provide details LOL

  • ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    So here’s what happened recently:

    • I opened the Google News widget on my Android phone, saw a Sponsored link, and found it interesting
    • Clicked on it, the link opened in Chrome, opening the googleadservices redirection thingummy
    • Took over 5 seconds to process the redirect
    • I exited the browser

    Guess who missed ad money?


    But of course, maybe they got the ad money and the only losers were:

    • me, who didn’t get to see the website that might actually have had something I wanted
    • the website owner, who not only didn’t get my business but also had to pay Google, because Google most probably processed the ad first and didn’t care to process the redirect

    I feel like I understand why they removed the “Do no evil” sign. Because now, they are messing with both, the product and the customers, only providing as much as is required to take their money, instead of the full, advertised service.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I saw something that might be this happening last week where every video took an extra 20 seconds to load and presented a popup that took you to the support page where the first thing listed to troubleshoot your problem was disabling ad blockers, but this week the videos are perfect and load normally; but the rest of the page is absolutely fucked. Like the “playables” section last night was tripping balls and looked like a slot machine as the entries randomly changed around at light speeds. The comments, related videos section on the right, description, etc all just refuse to load now on Firefox for me.

    Considering these issues for me have only happened recently, and coincidentally around the same time an issue with Google services took a shitton of the entire Internet down for almost a whole day, I suspect it’s not about blocking ad blockers so much as it is Google just fucking sucks at implementing any changes across the board of their products.

    • mesa@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ublock origin (if your using it) “fixed” the issue shortly after. Im convinced someone at google works on adblock lol. Probably not true but the timing was really fast.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nebula seems like it has the same types of videos I like to watch.

      I mean, Nebula is commercial service and I assume that they’d profile, the same as YouTube. Like, if you’re okay with that, you can get YouTube Premium.

      Of course, I can get into PeerTube as well.

      I’m still skeptical that this is going to scale sufficiently either in bandwidth or in amount of content.

      https://peertube.fediverse.observer/ for people who want to try it, though.

    • mesa@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah Peertube is awesome. It already scales very well with its tech. Its been growing too. I think its good to have multiple alternatives. Its a good free option.

      Ultimately the platform is the last important part of watching a video. If the creators can get more $$/activity going somewhere else they will. It happened to Vimeo, it will happen to Youtube.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I can’t tell an honest difference between 1080p and 720p from across a room. On a monitor, sure, but I grew up in the 90’s. Anything 480 and above is tolerable to me.

    I’m pirating it, should I demand my money back for poor service? Lmao

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Did you comment in the wrong place?

      Your comment is talking about resolution, and the post is about YouTube throttling speeds, not resolution of videos.

      I suspect you were trying to respond to a comment instead of making your own top level comment, though I’m not certain.

      In any case, if the comment is in the wrong place, now you know. If it isn’t, well, it may help to know that it’s out of place thematically.

      Edit: I think this comment https://midwest.social/comment/18120563 is where you intended to respond

  • RedEye FlightControl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    257
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah they are, I noticed it get really, really bad this week. It’s an awful experience. But they’ll leave my browser before my adblocker does.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      145
      ·
      2 days ago

      100%. Half the time I get blocked due to VPN or whatever I just close the tab and go with my life. The rest of the time I try all known workarounds. If those fail, I just go with my life.

      My hatred for monopolisation and enshittification is stronger than my desire to watch content on any platform.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      2 days ago

      The thing is, their anti-adblocking measures are still less unpleasant than actually watching ads.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same. When I opened the Stats for Nerds pop-up, I noticed that I was being throttled to 1500kbps. Anything above 720p was unplayable this week.

      But apparently the Ublock Origin devs yet again figured out another workaround, because streaming speeds are back to normal for me as of yesterday.

  • SpicyTaint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve started bulk downloading videos with yt-dlp and watching them locally. No ads or throttling to deal with.

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Me too. I’m up to 3TB locally. Had to do that slowly though. Hit some temp bans a few times.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If Google really wants to, they can crack down on yt-dlp, and I assume that if enough people are using it, they’re likely to do such a crackdown. Like, this works for the moment, but…

      • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah. How would you crack down a program that just play the videos in the background and then just capture the content while it’s played?

        Just queue up a bunch of vidoe you wanna watch, and let the program just essentially screen record it.

        Well if you say “DRM”? Well we could share it to a display that itself is hacked and record all the signals.

        Unless they are doing proctoring as if it were a test, there will always be some way to circumvent it.

          • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I’m so used to the sponsorship thing that I just instinctively tap/click the right side of the screen a few times to skip it.

            (As for why I don’t use sponsorblock: I don’t block them because I wanna take a few seconds to take a peak into the sponsor segment to make sure they don’t have very evil sponsors like ahem “Betterhelp” (I don’t trust someone that still have that as a sponsor in 2025)

            Edit: Also, I’m pretry sure someone will build a locally run AI model that can detect the ads/buffering and cut it out. “AI” might not give you true information in terms of search results, but pattern recognition is like its main job, right?

          • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Imagine adblock re-rencoding software that picks mp4s clean based on repeated content(ads). The user could select each ad as they happen, mark them as such and let it identify them from there. Imagine sharable or federated caches of these ad records between users.

            Someone who can code, please, imagine it.

            • passenger@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              What they should be imagining instead is a better video sharing platform. There are alternatives already…

              • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                Cause all you need is your imagination!

                And billions of dollars to build and run the site with servers worldwide. No biggie

      • rumba@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        It will happen eventually. All they need to do is start new/rotating keys on wildvine and put the ads at random times right in the stream, then disable fast forward if you use it to skip ads. It’ll be a UX hit, so it’ll need to be worth it to them.

        In the end, they can’t stop us from HDMI capturing and using comskip to detect / remove but there are a million ways to play tag between where we are now and that which don’t require people posting videos to pirate bay :)

            • solrize@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              strip out the HDCP

              Interesting, I had figured that was possible in principle but hadn’t kept up with what was actually around.

              But still, the HDCP stream is decompressed video, so if you want to save it, you’ll have to either put it through yet another layer or lossy compression, or burn a ridiculous amount of disk space compared to the compressed stream that Youtube sent to your computer.

              We’ll see how things go. Google in the past has made occasional modest gestures to get in the way of downloading, but they haven’t made serious effort to prevent it. Who knows whether that will last.

            • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              They aren’t fool proof, and relatively easy to detect from the source.

              Source: high end AV tech for like half a decade

          • rumba@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I break HDCP right now. Those keys have been leaked for AGES. $10 amazon HDMI copy in between your videocard and the capture.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Virtual desktop program that watches videos and uses sponsorblock and adblock after the fact to pick it clean and re-encode it.

        I’m that level of anal

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not really following video DRM, but my understanding is that Widevine won’t run in a VM with a virtualized video card like that.

      • mesa@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        My ip was blocked a LONG time ago by google for using yt-dlp. Works with VPN but nothing else. Fun times. I think I only pulled a couple of videos off for archival services. On my own channel non-the-less.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You might try again. I was blocked for a couple weeks after I pulled a bunch of videos from a channel using yt-dlp, and for a while YouTube required an account (which I will not get) from that IP. But a couple weeks later, things were working again.

          • mesa@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ok cool! I updated yt-dlp via pip, and it looks like its working again. No warnings or anything. Awesome.

        • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Right. At the end of the bullshit, the content still plays to completion if the user hits play. We can script and Ai and remove ads all day long after a program snags the feed.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the way.

      When YouTube wanted to throw me some entertainment and a couple ads, very conveniently, I was down for that.

      Now that it’s an all out technology knowledge battle - well, I’m quite good at that.

      So I spend the time I would have laughed at their ad instead working around their bullshit.

      I haven’t seen an ad in years, but I still enjoy the same content. 🤷‍♀️

      To me, it seems like they’re working really hard, just to fail to serve me ads.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I would but my issue with that is that SponsorBlock doesn’t work on downloaded videos.

          • Psythik@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I use SponsorBlock for more than just skipping sponsored segments. It’s also useful for skipping intros, “like and subscribe” messages, and other general annoyances in most YouTube videos. Once you get used to it, you can’t go without.

    • B_DL@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m new to yt-dlp. Care to share your flags? I’m a little confused on which ones I actually need.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I mean, you don’t need anything; it’ll work with no flags. I have these:

        $ cat ~/.config/yt-dlp/config
        --embed-subs
        --embed-metadata
        --embed-chapters
        --embed-thumbnail
        --sponsorblock-mark=all
        $
        

        That’ll just embed some useful metadata in the file.

        • Kairos@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Note that subtitles doesn’t include automatic subtitles. For that you have to do --write-auto-subs in conjunction

        • sh00g@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Also if you just want the audio to listen to (I like to do this with TTRPGs) you can do:

          yt-dlp -x -f bestaudio

          Also works great in a pinch for getting sounds and music for FoundryVTT.

          • tal@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I’m pretty sure that it defaults to best quality.

            goes looking at man page

               By default, yt-dlp tries to download the best available quality if you don't  pass  any  options.   This  is  generally
               equivalent to using -f bestvideo*+bestaudio/best.  However, if multiple audiostreams is enabled (--audio-multistreams),
               the  default  format changes to -f bestvideo+bestaudio/best.  Similarly, if ffmpeg is unavailable, or if you use yt-dlp
               to stream to stdout (-o -), the default becomes -f best/bestvideo+bestaudio.
            

            So I think that it should normally pull down the best audio unless you get into some situation where YouTube doesn’t offer a format that simultaneously has the combination of highest audio quality with the highest video quality; if it has to do so to get the highest video quality then, it’ll sacrifice audio quality.

            EDIT: Hmm. I could have sworn that there was more text about prioritizing relative audio and video quality at one point in the man page, but I don’t see anything there now. Maybe it can just always get the best audio quality, regardless of video quality, can pull 'em entirely separately.

      • SpicyTaint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m a filthy Windows user that’s too lazy to migrate my main PC to Fedora.

        > Path\to\yt-dlp.exe -P <target directory> <URL>
        

        Multiple URLs can be separated by spaces. Put any URLs with ampersands in quotes or remove the ampersand and following arguments.

        You can find a list of all the arguments on the yt-dlp github page

    • gruhuken@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’ve been doing this with band love videos and storing them on a hard drive. One I love got taken down and almost lost a while back and it’s made me paranoid ha

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    Make me wait 5 mins on a black screen and I’ll do that before watching an ad.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ive been commenting on creators videos asking them to upload elsewhere as well. I doubt it will work, but we could try

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      A lot of my favorites are already on Nebula. I’d ask the rest to follow but that would require a google account.

      • LeTak@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I also asked some creators, but they can’t because of the Google partnership Programm, it prohibits reupload on other platforms

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    I watched videos on Newgrounds using dial-up

    They are going to have to slow ad blockers by a lot for me to consider it slow

    • mesa@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      My wife and I were discussing this. This isnt “slow” to us, its just a tiny bit inconvenient. We were used to the old AOL pictures taking a good minute or two to load.

      We would get rid of Youtube before we get ads.

    • Shaper@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Is it possible to post the same video both to youtube and peertube without trouble? I wonder if this is prohibited cause I think many creators would mirror their content to peertube if they could.

  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been seeing this for a couple weeks now along with a popup telling me “ad blockers aren’t allowed” at work where I’m forced to use Chrome. I have UBlock Lite installed. Typically a refresh takes care of the popup and a 10 second delay later, the video loads.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      uBlock Lite is simply not as potent, so it’s understandable it can be beaten. Almost like Google is abusing their monopoly

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I run portable Firefox on my work PC. I refuse to use chrome. some of our apps require Edge, but outside of that, I don’t touch chrome.

    • myreel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I switched to Firefox basically as soon as ublock origin didn’t work on chrome. It was easier than I thought it would be.