• thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I don’t get it. What’s wrong with it? If it is that clear, could you explain it to me?

              • Flyberius [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                There’s nothing to explain. I guess the idea of someone who just follows Gabe Newell is funny and could be interpreted as lame. It’s not that deep.

                • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  But that still does not answer my question as to why that is “lame” (or in other words “loser”). So in this entire conversation and reply chain, you just wasted my time? If you don’t gonna answer the question, why do you keep these “lame” replies then? I just asked a simple question, didn’t I? And if it is relaly obvious and easy to see, how does it come you can’t explain it? Seems like a paradox to me.

      • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah, you tell em! Sitting in the corner of your bedroom facing the corner while someone you met on craigslist has sex with your partner is something winners do too! You can’t just call someone a loser for having their lunch money stolen and wearing a t-shirt with their bullies name on it!

        Remember 2012?? Bacon narwhal! Le steam sale epic! I love Gabe! I love billionaires!