• joemo@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wish removing a song from my Discover weekly or similar lists actually worked. I swear I remove the same song from that playlist for months and it still shows up.

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, they have all this money and the algorithms are getting more stupid. I hate it when saying “play Travis” (I use voice commands in car) always plays the exact same playlist in the exact same order. They also push the most popular songs on you so if a band you like did a shitty Barbie cover you will hear it all the time. And there’s no dislike button to get rid of it. On my phone I just play custom playlists because the algorithms suck so much.

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I haven’t been at the whim of spotify’s bullshit algorithm since years ago when I just stopped playing their radio at all. Maybe I’ll hear one or two songs when the album m listening to ends and I haven’t had a chance to pick what’s next, but I don’t rely on their bullshit. Every song I play I’ve chosen to play.

          Look at me, stickin it to the man.

          • ExLisper@linux.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve stopped using their recommendations (except in my car) for other reason: I no longer knew the albums. It used to be you would get new album from X, you would listen to it couple of times, learn the song titles and think “this new album is awesome/shit/better then the last one”. With Spotify it was just constant stream of songs from the sam e artist without any idea of their artistic progression. I missed that part so now I just listen to whole albums and custom playlists.

            • TheFriar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ah. See, I never grew out of album listening. I fought mp3 players for so long I probably nearly killed an extra 15 people in my life flipping through my massive CD book as I drove probably too fast down the road when I was 16.

              Thinking about it, I’ve probably missed a lot of songs I would’ve loved that way, because when a new album comes out and it can’t grab me in the first few songs, I don’t go back and listen until I sometimes give them another shot.

        • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I can’t understand why people pay for this shit - how is that any better than the radio??

          (I still go the cheapskate route and maintain my own library)

    • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Humans think real random isn’t random 🙃

      It’s wild but they see patterns

      • pup_atlas@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The problem isn’t that their random is biased or has rules, the is that it is entirely deterministic, to the point where it will play the same exact songs, in the same exact order for days. It’s as if shuffle just activates a hidden “shuffle” playlist that only updates once a week.

      • rush@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well, computers physically cannot be random, they rely on logic

        • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          CSPRNGs are a thing…

          As are radioactive sources

          And there’s mathematical tests for whether something is random enough

          So no, computers really can do random xD

          • rush@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            CSPRNG literally stands for “cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator”. All randomness in computers is pseudorandom. Not TRULY random

            Radioactive sources for randomness aren’t really just put into your average household PC or phone either for obvious reasons.

            • pl_woah@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              A CSPRNG is more than random enough for a playlist xD

              Take it from someone who works in the field - computers do random well enough rotflol

              • rush@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s not what I’m doubting here. I was raising awareness to the fact that a computer physically cannot be truly random. I know that pseudorandomness is enough as we cannot perceive a difference easily.