Short disclosure, I work as a Software Developer in the US, and often have to keep my negative opinions about the tech industry to myself. I often post podcasts and articles critical of the tech industry here in order to vent and, in a way, commiserate over the current state of tech and its negative effects on our environment and the Global/American sociopolitical landscape.

I’m generally reluctant to express these opinions IRL as I’m afraid of burning certain bridges in the tech industry that could one day lead to further employment opportunities. I also don’t want to get into these kinds of discussions except with my closest friends and family, as I could foresee them getting quite heated and lengthy with certain people in my social circles.

Some of these negative opinions include:

  • I think that the industries based around cryptocurrencies and other blockchain technologies have always been, and have repeatedly proven themselves to be, nothing more or less than scams run and perpetuated by scam artists.
  • I think that the AI industry is particularly harmful to writers, journalists, actors, artists, and others. This is not because AI produces better pieces of work, but rather due to misanthropic viewpoints of particularly toxic and powerful individuals at the top of the tech industry hierarchy pushing AI as the next big thing due to their general misunderstanding or outright dislike of the general public.
  • I think that capitalism will ultimately doom the tech industry as it reinforces poor system design that deemphasizes maintenance and maintainability in preference of a move fast and break things mentality that still pervades many parts of tech.
  • I think we’ve squeezed as much capital out of advertising as is possible without completely alienating the modern user, and we risk creating strong anti tech sentiments among the general population if we don’t figure out a less intrusive way of monetizing software.

You can agree or disagree with me, but in this thread I’d prefer not to get into arguments over the particular details of why any one of our opinions are wrong or right. Rather, I’d hope you could list what opinions on the tech industry you hold that you feel comfortable expressing here, but are, for whatever reason, reluctant to express in public or at work. I’d also welcome an elaboration of said reason, should you feel comfortable to give it.

I doubt we can completely avoid disagreements, but I’ll humbly ask that we all attempt to keep this as civil as possible. Thanks in advance for all thoughtful responses.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    It will create a fully autonomous and self sufficient robot army one day and the 1% will genocide the working class with said army after our labor is no longer needed.

  • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The Microsh*t Office Suit is atrocious — both from a Software Dev and ordinary user perspective. Literally any alternative is better, Libre Office, Google Office, etc.

    Word is bloated, slow, impractical, bad for collaboration, and politically dubious. Teams is buggy, impractical, also politically dubious, and lacks many basic features. At this point, I literally despise Microsoft. Also Windows really seems to be unusable, from the enlightened perspective of a Mac or Linux user (in my case the latter).

    SystemD is bloated and stopping Linux from getting faster.

    Most mainstream programming languages suck, Rust being the exception.

    Alright, I’m done ;)

    Edit: any website that breaks because of uBlock Origin medium mode is poorly made and not trustworthy. /endrant

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        The systemd take is goofy, but everything regarding Microsoft is spot on. Teams is an eldritch horror.

      • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        My office forces everyone to use Microsoft (there’s a lot of Mac and Windows users), and whenever I complain, people get pissed at me. God knows why.

        As for SystemD, I think a lot of people think it’s fine and people like me are exaggerating. I guess that’s fine, but non-systemD systems (Void Linux being my favorite) are so much faster, it’s unbelievable.

        And then there’s a lot of generic language programmers and business owners, who are very willing to defend their income source. Like everyone I know. (I’m really dying here; I gotta find a cool Rust or LISP company)

        As for uBO, it’s a “progress” thing. If using masses of third parties and trackers makes stuff more innovative (not to mention laggy), then it’s good, they claim.

        I’m happy to hear that Lemmy shares my opinion though, that’s a little comforting :)

        • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          I use Artix Linux with runit as my daily driver. I’ll admit, its very nice, but I haven’t run systemd except on my VPSs for years now, so I really don’t know if it’s slow or not as my point of reference is long gone.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Fuck no. A beginner learning base concepts like arrays, conditionals, loops, variables, functions, etc. should use something much less punishing like Python. It’s much easier to iterate, to understand your mistakes, and to learn from others when you use a simpler language.

        When you’re ready to learn about pointers, memory management, etc. then you can take on Rust.

  • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago
    • IT reconversions are bullshit and dangerous to the industry. Everyone and their grandma are becoming “programmers”. We’re in the “fuck around” phase, the “find out” will be explosive. Companies are inundating themselves with these “reconverted” juniors and doing soft-layoffs to seniors…

    • crypto, Blockchain and AI are just bs to make a quick buck out of investors. They are truly disastrous to the environment

    • If you use chatgpt et al. I’ll look down on you from a technical competence level

    • marketing and middle management are mostly useless. A good, and small, sales+marketing team is very effective but the moment they start growing they start to degenerate pretty fast into BS world and imposing company culture

    • needanke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago
      • If you use chatgpt et al. I’ll look down on you from a technical competence level

      Eh, I have to say I find it quite usefull sometimes for brainstorming solutions. It is esentially a rubber duck that answers and sometimes gives good ideas.

      Of course the answers are often bullshit, but they can sometimes point you in the right direction/to the right words to google.

      (All of this ignoring the enviromental problems ofc.)

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Phhht…AI rocks. Nobody else tells me “you’re absolutely right, I’m very sorry for any inconvenience caused” in every sentence. They make me feel so smart.

      /s, obviously.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If you use chatgpt el al. I’ll look down on you from a technical competence level

      If someone asks “But using google is the same”, no they are not the same. Chatgtp is a toddler which has been force-fed information and is rewarded if the generated answer statistically makes sense. Google, or any search engine, points to a page where actual humans have discussed about the problem. They can also be wrong, but you can see the thought process of the individuals, and sometimes you can even ask the experts directly. It’s a very different experience.

      • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Google searches have become increasingly worthless over time. I find it depressingly difficult to find things now.

        Considering grabbing a sub on one of the paid search engines like Kagi: the search actually works.

      • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You can also ask chatgpt its thought process and it’s very easy to sniff out when it’s hallucinating something. It’s an incredibly useful tool and I really don’t know anyone in tech that doesn’t use it.

        • xavier666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Oh I use it (Gemini in my case) regularly, however in very specific scenarios. I use it for very mundane tasks. However, I don’t want use it for highly technical fields. There’s a nice quote regarding this “I use ChatGPT only when I’m sure of the answer”

          • Irelephant@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I literally just use ai for random obsecure linux commands that i am unable to get from google , and trying to find the names of things that i don’t know.

  • Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I truly believe that innovating the internet is really running in place. Might be just me but I can’t think of anything we can really do, to ‘evolve’ it. We’re doing everything that we’ve been doing in the past three decades, but it’s only just been more accessible and the speeds faster (depending where you are). But we’re not actually moving the needle when it comes to progressing the internet as a whole.

    And I see it this way as to why. We’ve experienced two big booms in Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, with Web 1.0 being what some consider the Wild West of the internet. Web 2.0 is basically the great social media bubble that has blossomed for years. We’re not doing anything new or different now than we did back in 2007. Every new social media platform that comes out is recycling the exact same things as many before it presented. I truly think we stopped evolving the internet the day we managed to get messengers onto phones when phones were developing and it’s only been perfected by the age of the first wave of smartphones.

    So I just think with all of this AI stuff, this “Web 3.0” I’ve been hearing about for a few years now, the Metaverse .etc are all just gimmicks. Gimmicks of shitty ideas coming from the wrong people that should be practicing said ideas, all saying that they’re innovating the internet when all that they’re doing is just taking advantage of the internet for themselves. All within political theater of course.

    • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      What about Sir Tim Berners-Lee’s SoLiD (social linked data)? I mean, I guess it only (or mainly) pertains to data, and doesn’t necessarily change the web itself

  • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    There are some highly intelligent, very dangerous people out there, and 95% of companies will be incapable of stopping them. Most people, across all industries, are too slow, uneducated, lazy or just uncaring enough that no amount of training or tools will fix it.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    CEOs and all management suite are mostly useless except for making the business worse for the employees and customers for the sake of investors.

    Most employees are perfectly fine with slow and steady growth instead of maximizing it.

    • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s interesting the preconceived notions over managements usefulness and the actual role a CEO plays in a company. I’ve had a lot of conversations with people over the years and everyone just expects that it “has to be this way or it won’t work”. Like every admin position is critical or the company will fail, completely disregarding that most of those positions didn’t exist before and the company ran just fine.

      There’s a lot of misinformation over what their actual job entails. Management is mostly just one big “telephone” game (been on all sides of it, got out just in time before it warped my perception of life). The original role of being support is completely absent in their duties as our society and culture has changed. People also think a co-op would never work because you need a big shot CEO who runs the company and makes all the decisions (they don’t, plenty of examples in reality).

      It’s kinda funny to hear a lot of the tech people on here mention imposter syndrome. Every person in administration has this feeling deep down inside that they aren’t important and they have no clue what they’re doing. The only difference is everyone in the C-suite pat’s eachother on the back and help build each other’s ego up so they can just pretend they don’t feel it. It’s why people in these positions get so defensive and irate if you start dissecting their actual duties and importance. They’ve been reassured everyday that what they do is integral when it’s suppose to be the managers job to make his employees feel that way.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Right now, Ai is a party trick.

    Tomorrow, Ai will inform the FBI that #29933 is planning on murdering his sister, and deploy a team of armed drones to escort him to prison, if he makes it.

    Tomorrow, the department stores and supermarkets will be empty and you’ll pick up your groceries from an automated warehouse that inserts them into your car.

    Tomorrow, the mail bot will barf your mail into a labeled box, wherin you’ll find your prescription medication, bottled labeled and packaged by nobody, which you take right after you go out to eat at an empty restaurant, where your food is brought to you by an automated track that says tHaNk Yo in an inhuman tone before cutting off too soon.

    No conversations, no traveling, no hassle, no humanity, or sincerity whatsoever.

    hooray?

    Why the fuck is everyone so stoked about this? Vending-machine land sounds insufferable.

    • rthomas6@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Well, this scenario COULD result in the fabled Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism, where machines take care of most of the labor and the benefit of this is shared among everyone. But more likely, most of the benefit of this will be given to a select few.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    rabbits in skinner boxes pressing two buttons for a treat is not a far cry from tech workers sitting in cublices pressing 104 buttons for paycheck nor internet users doing it for imaginary internet points.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Luckily, as I work for the local govt, I can talk all the shit I want about the tech sector and technologies as a whole. My colleagues obviously don’t agree with every opinion I share (some 3 even think Amazon is “actually good” and one networking guy is a cryptobro), but none of us are at any risk from talking shit about companies and their leaders, or tech shenanigans in general. Now, talking about our higher ups is trouble.

  • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The whole “tech industry” naming is bulllshit, there is more technology let’s say in composite used to build an aircraft wing or in a surgerical robots, than in yet another mobile app showing you ads

    The whole tech sector also tend to be over evaluated on the stock market. In no world Apple is worth 3 trillion while coca cola or airbus are worth around 200 billions

      • teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you want apples to apples, why the hell is Tesla, a company that makes under 2m vehicles, have a market cap of 1.4T while Toyota, a company that makes 10 million vehicles a year, has a market cap of 233B. No matter how you look at it, Toyota has better numbers in every way, but Tesla is a tech company as far as the market is concerned.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Tesla doesn’t just make cars. Tesla also makes batteries and photovoltaic panels.

          I agree that Tesla is wildly overvalued and treated as a tech stock, but electric cars isn’t the only thing Tesla makes.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      My secret sexist opinion is: Fill your DBA team with women, lead by a woman, and then just stand back and turn them loose. I absolutely love all female DBA teams because they kick fucking ass always. [edit I’m a cis wm 50s for context]

      Every woman developer or QA person I’ve ever worked with has been an absolute rockstar.

      My theory is that this is because the industry is sexist enough that all the women who aren’t like that don’t find it worth their while to persist at it and find other careers. : (

    • ahal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      If the person I will report to can’t code, I pass on the contract

      I get this, it’s really frustrating to have a clueless manager. But to me, a bigger problem is the reverse.

      I’d rather have a manager with no technical ability and excellent people skills, than a manager with excellent technical ability but no people skills. The latter is all too common in my experience.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      If the person I will report to can’t code, I pass on the contract.

      I feel like that’s just a preference regarding jobs.

      Part of the job of being the chief coder is having to translate back and forth between the people doing the coding and the people paying them to do so. You need a lot of high level technical knowledge to do the job well, but you aren’t going to be technical in application.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s only if the company specializes in one type of software.

          It is common in larger companies or companies that need software but aren’t software companies where you are going to hit a manager with little technical talent, let alone less technical talent in what you’re working on.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      My current employer was founded on the basis of the first two statements. They said they would never hire anyone who didn’t have a background in tech. Even the HR manager lady who processed my onboarding had a history of coding and I’ve never before seen an individual who had been in both industries.

      Unfortunately, since I started, my company was bought by a bigger company who was then themselves bought by a bigger company. Though my employer still has one of the best workforces I’ve ever seen, it seems we no longer hold the “tech background only” policy.

  • LenielJerron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    When I was in undergrad I did debate, and a term that was used to describe the debate topics was “a solution in need of a problem”. I think that that very often characterizes the tech industry as a whole.

    There is legitimately interesting math going on behind the scenes with AI, and it has a number of legitimate, if specialized, use-cases - sifting through large amounts of data, etc. However, if you’re an AI company, there’s more money to be made marketing to the general public and trying to sell AI to everyone on everything, rather than keeping it within its lane and letting it do the thing that it does well, well.

    Even something like blockchain and cryptocurrency is built on top of somewhat novel and interesting math. What makes it a scam isn’t the underlying technology, but rather the speculation bubbles that pop up around it, and the fact that the technology isn’t being used for applications other than pushing a ponzi scheme.

    For my own opinions - I don’t really have anything I don’t say out loud, but I definitely have some unorthodox opinions.

    • I think that the ultra-convenient mobile telephone, always on your person at all times, has been a net detriment societally speaking. That is to say, the average iPhone user would be living a happier, more fulfilling, more authentic life if iPhones had not become massively popular. Modern tech too often substitutes genuine real-in-person interactions for online interactions that only approximate it. The instant gratification of always having access to all these opinions at all times has created addictions to social media that are harder to quit than cocaine (source: I have a friend who successfully quit cocaine, and she said that she could never quit instagram). The constantly-on GPS results in people not knowing how to navigate their own towns; if you automate something without learning how to do it, you will never learn how to do it. While that’s fine most of the time, there are emergency situations where it just results in people being generally less competent than they otherwise would have been.

    • For the same reason, I don’t like using IDEs. For example when I code in java, the ritual of typing “import javafx.application.Application;” or whatever helps make me consciously aware that I’m using that specific package, and gets me in the headspace. Plus, being constantly reminded of what every single little thing does makes it much easier for me at least to read and parse code quickly. (But I also haven’t done extensive coding since I was in undergrad).

    • Microsoft Office Excel needs to remove February 29th 1900. I get that they have it so that it’s backwards compatible with some archaic software from the 1990s; it’s an annoying pet peeve.

    • Technology is not the solution to every problem, and technology can make things worse as much as it can make things better. Society seems to have a cult around technological progress, where any new tech is intrinsically a net good for society, and where given any problem the first attempted solution should be a technological one. But for example things like the hyperloop and tesla self-driving cars and so forth are just new modern technology that doesn’t come anywhere near as close to solving transportation problems as just implementing a robust public transit network with tech that’s existed for 200 years (trains, trolleys, busses) would.

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m interested in reading more about coding java without an IDE, what’s your usual workflow? Do you use maven or gradle or something else? Are there solutions or scripts you use to make up for some functionality of an IDE?

  • NotLuigi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m personally very conflicted between my love of computers and the seeming necessity of conflict minerals in their construction. How much coltan is dug up every year just to be shoved into an IoT device whose company will be defunct in six months, effectively bricking the thing? Even if the mining practices were made humane, they wouldn’t be sustainable. My coworkers are very cool for tech workers. Vague anticapitalist sentiments. Hate Elon. But I don’t think they’re ready for this conversation.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      How much coltan is dug up every year just to be shoved into an IoT device whose company will be defunct in six months, effectively bricking the thing?

      Man, there’s a lot of this. But what really gets me going is electronics that are actually made to be disposable. Motherfuckers hitting a vape with a little LCD screen then littering it. No hope.