• jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is there a company yet that let’s me pay them to internet disconnect and rip out sensors on a modern car?

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Dacia doesn’t have that crap. They only have the mandatory SOS system.

      BTW, if someone has a way to rip that system out, please share

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do they make an electric car that doesn’t have such sensors (eg cabin microphone) and doesn’t have internet access?

        • Courant d'air 🍃@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          They do, the Dacia Spring has nothing like that if I’m not wrong

          Edit: just checked, and it seems they added all the connected big screens crap, my bad

          • oldfart@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t know about electric but the regular ones are available in basic versions without internet and “luxury” ones with all that crap

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Accidentally, lol. The point was to mine and sell the data, wasn’t it? Not exactly private.

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Obviously… It’s anti-libre software. It fails to include a libre software license text file, like GPL. We do not control it.

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      From what a gathered, it was the classic misconfigured AWS S3 Bucket. It’s criminal how AWS still makes the default configuration insecure.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It doesn’t default insecure anymore and it bitches at you when you try to make it public.

        My bet would be that It was either a pre-existing bucket, or some team put a “temporary” measure in (making it public) instead of using the API to pull the data until they got around to implementing it correctly.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The default for net new buckets is actually very strict.

        But it’s that strictness that makes devs just to open it up to everyone and not learn proper IAM syntax.

        The unfortunate part is that AWS made rules and privileges so nuanced and detailed that it makes people want to make everything public and deal with it “later”.

        • drspod@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          How do people end up finding them? Don’t they have random UUIDs in the URL? Or are they predictable?

          • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Bucket names are often committed to GitHub. It used to be that bucket names could be published but ever since the blog post of the guy getting fucked by people polling his bucket due to an open source project typo made others realize that bucket names should probably be secrets.

            There are bots that will just monitor all public commits to github, gitlab, etc. for AWS credentials and other strings like that. And as soon as they are found they will start to abuse them.

          • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            All you have to do is monitor the network traffic and then scan any AWS subdomains/IPs that pop up.

            [edit] this makes me think… it’s not really possible for a secure connection from all of VW’s vehicles to an S3 bucket, is it? Anyone can pull the key from any of the millions of vehicles making the connection.

            • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              You could secure it using an IAM user with credentials but then those credentials would be available on all vehicles.

              If the vehicles had direct access to S3, maybe that’s why the bucket was public? But you could also just leave it available to the public.

              But if that was the design, you should sweep the bucket on a regular basis to make sure there aren’t any objects over x hours old or something like that.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It was also the classic “collecting the information to begin with,” and it’s criminal how that is allowed, too.

  • ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t get why they feel the need to keep it a secret.
    Google takes GeoLocation data with maps and people happily use it. I even put reviews for places I go to.

    If they were to just be above board about it while selling the stuff, they would have much happier customers and they could even get some legitimate use out of the data, like traffic status that Google does.

    I’m not a fan of Google, but must say, they definitely managed to do better in this regard.

  • bazingabot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    …and of course no severe consequences for Volkswagen, all Europe is only like “whooops,…anyways…”

  • Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would love to know how to disable telemetry on my own hard drive on wheels or at worst prevent it from phoning home. Mozilla did a great job bringing this issue to light but now we need actionable solutions that don’t rely on governments passing laws

  • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Anyone that has owned a recent VW, knew this was true. I would get text messages from my local dealer anytime I was close to needing an oil change.

    • Rogue@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wouldn’t that just be a time based notification rather then dependent on any privacy invading metrics?

      • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Not from my experience. I went from driving the car like 30000 miles a year to like 5000, the text messages were always about right on time for my services based on miles driven. Clearly the car was reporting to VW in some way routinely.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s so weird! Just like when my dentist calls me to an appointment when I’ve had a cavity for six years! Incredible! Just when I need to fill it!

  • marx2k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    After dieselgate and the discovery that VW was subjecting monkeys and humans to exhaust fumes in experimentation, their sales are still fine.

    I honestly don’t think consumers give a shit about what negative things companies do.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s when they become loud mouth attention seekers like Musk that people begin to care. But if everyone claiming to boycott Musk products actually boycotted all the companies that have done terrible things (and way worse than musk), they’d suddenly have nothing to buy.

    • LavaPlanet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think they just don’t know. People are oversaturated and oversaturated and overloaded, and suffering for scraps, nobody has time, mental space or money to be choosy. Researching companies, suspiciously doesn’t show results. Finding that information isn’t easy, by design. It might be released, on the same day something else happens. But mostly people aren’t watching the news to the depth required to soak that stuff in, and don’t have the extra energy to soak anything in. Everything sent into our hands and eyes as news is controlled by a few with vested inrests. It would be lovely if there was a place that collected atrocities and kept them fresh. Who stopped buying nestle after all the horrible things they’ve done. I can bet you have supported a company with your dollar, that’s responsible for huge atrocities, it’s almost impossible to avoid. Look at the stuff happening in the Congo atm, all the top brands, committing atrocities for new phones to be built. How much have we heard about all of that? There’s so much. Where do you start. Funny story, I watched resident evil with my kid, just recently, and it was terrifying for whole new reasons. A top company who owns everything, goes into weapon manufacturing and creating advanced bio weapons, accidentally releases it, then doubles down continuously, shutting thousands in to die, and firing into crouds to cover up what it did. And that doesn’t seem far fetched, any more. All for the ever expansion of money, something that has a finite amount set. Literally the only way to achieve ever expansion is to commit atrocities, there’s a point where you take too much and the only option is atrocities to make more. And that’s capitalism, baby!!