• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Even there though, what is the actual point of a phone app controlled smart toilet, even if you open sourced the whole thing? Unlocking one’s phone and tapping the app icon, and then presumably a button on the app, is going to take more time than one press of a lever that one is right next to anyway, and the latter doesn’t present as many points of failure.

    • Walican132@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well if you read the product description it was to allow AI Bidet control. However they had not received funding for AI so it was outsourced to a team of laborers in India using cameras and joysticks.

      It also logged the consistency, frequency and matter samples from all BMs so you could make informed dedication opinions.

      Spoiler

      /s

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have no interest in one, but playing devil’s advocate, some might consider it more sanitary since you don’t have to touch the toilet to flush and have the choice of not being near it, hopefully avoiding any spray.

      Also, if your guests use the restroom, you can startle them at any time.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          That occurred to me while writing my comment, as well, and I don’t like the implications.

          I would imagine they have to ask you, yes. If the toilet can be flushed without authentication, they’d probably still have to ask you how.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Probably just the extra cost of linkage and maybe risk of tripping over it

          • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Designing foot-operated things tends to fly in the face of modern accessibility standards. Wheelchair users already have enough problems using public toilets.

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              They can still have both. A foot pedal for those who want it, a standard handle for those who don’t or can’t. In fact, retrofitting existing handle-flush toilets to add foot pedals could make a lot of sense.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Oh shit, I guess that’s true, yeah. Wheelchair bathrooms are there own thing but not every place has them, at least where I live.

          • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I assume lack of demand. In your own home, you’d be keeping the handle clean, and public washrooms often use the touchless sensor types.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              and public washrooms often use the touchless sensor types.

              Now. I’m guessing you only have to go back to 2000 for that to be a futuristic new thing, though, while the history of the modern flush toilet goes back to the Victorian era.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, wouldn’t want to get bacteria on your hands a few seconds before washing your hands.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The privacy issues are nasty, but a smart toilet could actually be an incredibly useful device.

      Can you imagine if every time you went to the bathroom, your toilet could do some of the basic stool / urine tests you get at the doctor’s office? Certain diseases could be caught extremely early, and you wouldn’t have to do anything different.

      And then there are bidet functions. Forget smearing poop all over your ass with paper, wash the poop off with nice warm water every time.

      I wouldn’t want to have to use a smartphone app for that, but there’s no reason you couldn’t have a simple set of buttons on the toilet itself. You could keep the manual flush lever and only use that if you preferred, but if you wanted an even better experience and a better clean, that option would be available.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ok maybe the flushing part is a bit overkill and mostly a joke, but a toilet that can deliver notifications like if it’s clogged for example before you use it and make it worse would have fantastic utility IMO

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I guess, but I’ve never heard of a toilet clogging before it’s used.

        There’s other better examples, though. Smart thermostats get plenty of use from the people I know with them. A fridge that tracks how long stuff has been inside would be dope. Smart lights have uses.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Toilets can appear to have flushed fully, but still have…material…stuck in the U-bend that hasn’t completely evacuated the toilet. A subsequent flush won’t work, even though the water in the bowl is clean.

          Ask me how I know.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Well, I suppose it is the kind of system where a lot of weird non-deterministic things can happen.

            What kind of sensor are we thinking of here? Optical? I know it’s a real issue to find something that doesn’t foul or misread even in the simpler application of an RV septic tank.

            I wonder if you could just put a window in the U-bend for manual inspection. It’s supposed to be full of “clean” water most of the time anyway.

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, not to mention, adding any sort of electronic components to the thing would be dicey at best. A lot of bathrooms don’t even have power outlets anywhere near the toilet.

              I’d prefer some sort of pressure-activated valve or something, but this is an engineering challenge that’s beyond my meager skills.

      • mj_marathon@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        This makes zero sense. If it’s clogged, you’d know beforehand when you look in the bowl. Why the would anyone need a notification for that?

        The ONLY utility that I could see here is if the notification logged who did the clogging so you could give them shit.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Toilets can appear to have flushed fully, but still have…material…stuck in the U-bend that hasn’t completely evacuated the toilet. A subsequent flush won’t work, even though the water in the bowl is clean.

          Ask me how I know.

          That said, this could almost certainly be better-solved in other ways. Maybe by preventing the tank from refilling if there’s still something in the u-bend (then you’d know it needed attention because there’d be no water in it)?

          • mj_marathon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago
            1. We don’t know that the toilet has this sensing capability.
            2. If it does, the actual fix is the same as if it were a regular toilet.

            This just isn’t an issue that needs technology as a solution.

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              125% agreed. I was responding only to “If it’s clogged, you’d know beforehand when you look in the bowl.” I think there’s potentially an engineering solution–a fluid dynamics engineering solution–but definitely not an app.

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            A little display or indicator light somewhere on the toilet itself would be better than connecting it to some IOT app

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Oh, absolutely. I was responding only to “If it’s clogged, you’d know beforehand when you look in the bowl.”

              An app for a toilet is a stupid idea, full stop.