• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you have a dominance-oriented worldview, being less shitty than your clout allows you to get away with is preemptively surrendering. Imposing your full shittiness on the world is dominance.

        The former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson is said to have not changed his socks daily, seeing imposing his stench on underlings and those wishing to deal with him as a power flex.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Who would dare question his nobility? Guy has so much money not a person around him is going to want to risk telling money bags himself he’s not the greatest person on earth.

      The reason: they either depend on him for money or if they don’t then they know he’s emotionally unstable enough to turn this into a monetary problem with lawsuits or political fuckery.

      Most people have seen how things go when they talk to their insane MAGA uncle about reality. Now just imagine if he had all day to fuck around, was constantly taking drugs and was unimaginably wealthy.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 month ago

          I just want him to feel like he can never trust anyone. No matter how much he pays his bodyguards, it would only take someone else offering a few of them just a little bit more to get him out of the way.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, 20 is about the point at which you’re actually making it easier for a nut job with a gun to get access to you.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why would he need protection from them? When was the last time security personnel offed the person they were hired to protect?

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        1 month ago

        1989, when Nicolae Ceasescu got killed by the Romanian Army officers he ran to for protection.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I always love to be reminded about that. It probably should have happened years earlier, but you take what you can get.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You’re right. Think about this. On January 6, 2021, Trump was illegally inciting an insurrection. He was surrounded by Secret Service agents who are only ostensibly paid to protect him.

        Secret Service agents first oath is to defend the Constitution. So, they actually had a primary duty that day, not to protect Trump, but to arrest him.

        They had all sworn a solemn oath that required them to take action against Trump, but nobody did anything of the sort. In fact, they famously broke the law by not retaining the information from their phones from that day.

  • 13igTyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 month ago

    Elon Musk, father of 14 children was basically never seen with his kids until a CEO was shot. Now he always travels with at least one portable meat shield.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 month ago

      Father of 14 known children. The down low is apparently he pays women one million dollars to bear his child and she has to sign a non-disclosure agreement that she won’t tell people it is his baby.

      He is on record saying he wants to make a legion. That is around five thousand babies. He is one of the richest men in the world so this is within his reach. I am going to go throw up now.

      • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        A million dollars? It’s sad those women don’t even realize what a paltry sum of money that is. You become a billionaires concubine, and all you get is enough money to pay for a house in a low cost area, and food/medical bills/clothes/school/activities for like maybe five years at most, then you get to find a job and become a single mother that works full time. And you better be careful with your choice of housing, taxes are due every year

        • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          How crazy expensive is america? One million is like thirty years of minimum wage salary before taxes in Spain. I bet I could manage to retire at 45 with that kind of money.

          • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            This person is greatly exaggerating. I bought a house in central Illinois with 4 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms for $130k

            Also, just having a million dollars is a big step up

          • sobchak@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Highly depends on area. $1 million is about 16 years of the median wage. It can be hard to survive on the median in some cities, but can be OK in rural or extremely economically depressed cities/towns. I don’t think federal minimum wage is enough to survive anywhere without assistance.

  • Kirp123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is the human shield kid a security professional too? By the time he’s 18 he will have 16 years of bodyguard experience, the perfect employee just like in those entry level job ads.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The people who wanted to “aspirationally” kill him were also “homicidal”. This is valuable contextual information that tells the reader(/listener) additional things about the circumstances that they may not have realised before which gives them more insight into the situation so they can comprehend it better. Em dash.

      • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It gives context from an unreliable source, placing emphasis on him as a victim rather than the cause of the asymmetric living conditions that his lifestyle causes.

    • Angry_Autist@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      A turd that no matter how bad he fucks up including if he ever gets charged with child trafficking, that will always be wealthier than your entire family line will ever be in their lifetimes of hard work

      He needs to be dragged into the streets and fear beaten into him

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good. Stay lonely with the gang of dudes you have to pay to hang around you and whose only job is to keep people away from you.

    I just went to see a movie with a big group of friends and now getting a burger, before tonight I work on a creative project with some other friends who all really respect and appreciate each other’s talents.

    Something this fascist freak will never have.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      assuming the freak is even capable of wanting such things or even understanding why someone would want it.

  • skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Foundation Security” 🙄

    Probably related to the Foundation series from Isaac Asimov and Musk’s absurd idea that he is remotely a figure in some such space story.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Is it fair to call someone who wants to kill the richest Nazi in the world, who wants to destroy western democracy and rule the world, a maniac?

  • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    In the olden times, it was a big point of pride of American politics that a lot of people didn’t want to kill the leaders. It was sort of assumed that in feudal style European politics, of course the common people kind of wanted to kill you, because you were threatening their safety and taking their stuff. In America, the way we did things was to earn the respect of the people you governed. The people actually wanted this person to be in charge. Why would I shoot that guy? That’s who we picked, we like him.

    Of course there are some caveats (slavery large among them). The reality never matched up to the ideal. But we’re going back to where even the approximation of consent of the governed that we used to have, isn’t assumed anymore. Fuckin bullshit

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Same. I can talk about combining Socialism, UBI, with a dash of heavily regulated capitalism that has wealth caps, and downvoters crawl out of the woodwork.

            Anyhow, toss me a link to one of your most detailed posts about this attention economy thing? I can’t promise to like it, but I should see if there are bits that would fit into the “Universal Ranked Income” system that I have been tinkering with.

            • Angry_Autist@lemmy.worldBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah I had a great thread on reddit about it, detailing how the currency and resources would be distributed, focusing on a curator ecosystem that replaces nearly all traditional advertising. It went on for several days with well over a dozen people contributing and mostly positive interactions

              Then later last year reddit permabanned me for saying ‘punching nazis is a moral good’, so I purged all of it.

              Appreciate your curiosity, wish I had a way to fulfill it

              • obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m not expert, but i’d start with ranked choice voting, campaign donations must come from a natural person and not a company, PAC, or any other organization, and term limits.

              • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Bring back the Fair doctrine or whatever it’s called and tax the shit out of the wealthy and super wealthy.

                Oh yeah, universal healthcare for all. Bring back regulating major industries and start basic income.

                • Angry_Autist@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I’m trying to contain a literal caldera of bitter vitriol, I am making a very strong effort not to use words that would get me banned, and I am probably going to fail.

                  Listen you rancid swatch of fasciitis infected distended rectum, there is no point in any of my threads here were I mention socialism. Not fucking once.

                  And this happens every motherFUCKING time I try to point out that rampant capitalism is literally killing the earth.

                  Me: Hey guys, maybe money making money is a bad economy

                  You: FUCKING SOCIALIST!

                  That’s why I have a no discussion rule, because of assmasters like you

                  And now that you’ve done your job of pissing me off to the point I get banned while looking like a cute little innocent angel, I’ll take my ban and you can fuck yourself till your bishop turns blue and falls off

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 month ago

    It is good to know this guy is terrified of the consequences of his own actions. I’m sure his hired meat shield will stop and mitigate some threats. I doubt they will stop and mitigate them all.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      We should feed his paranoia. Everyone should start messaging him on Twitter warning him of the prospect of mosquito-sized suicide drone assassins. Warn him there are rumors that he is the target of a group developing this technology.

      Let’s see if we can drive him truly mad. We’ll turn him into a proper Howard Hughes in no time. He’ll lock himself in a hermetically sealed bunker 24/7. And that’s when the real demons kick in…

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Modern warfare is surely more targeted? Precision strikes using overwhelming technical superiority. Throwing bodies at the problem is like WW1 warfare.

        • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not bodies, but ordnance. The classic example of this is in naval warfare. In defending against a threat a warship has a number of options, however, enough missiles will overwhelm these countermeasures. So your own interceptor missiles like ESSM will probably take out one incoming, your deck gun a second, chaff and jamming a couple more and CIWS another. So that’s a grand total of, if you’re lucky, five. This, to guarantee a hit, the other guy fires off six.

            • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Ships float because their hulls are made from a special form of foamed steel that is lighter than water. A great amount of air is forced into the steel as it cools, generating a steel bubble lattice that on net is lighter than water. This allows steel ships to float, even though the density of solid steel is about 490 lb/ft^3, while water is 62.4 lb/ft^3.

              /s

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s wild to me how Musk is proving (just like Trump is) how fundamentally weak and small he is.

    Fred Rogers never had to travel with a single bodyguard.