• shikitohno@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even cash breaks down pretty quickly in a hypothetical situation where you have something similar occur that lasts for an extended period. When banks’ systems are impacted, how do I get more cash from my account with them when whatever amount I had when the system went down runs out? I haven’t had a physical passbook for an account in a good 20 years.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    A cashless society is so stupid beyond words. In order to create one you must also create a full surveillance society to protect it, and even that would be ineffective to stop it from being hacked.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just to be clear we are a mostly cashless society and the majority of currency is not physically in existence around the world and somehow it manages to be protected by and large.

      • 800XL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The difference is that if someone decides to freeze your cashless bank account they can by a mouse click and you’re destitute. Whereas if that happens in a cash-based society they have to come and get it from you.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          well that is sorta my point. I keep some cash on hand but the majority of my money gets auto deposited and debited from there when I pay bills. If someone steals the majority of my money and I have somelike 1 to 10 percent its not a much better situation than them stealing all of my available funds. I mean it is which is how come I do keep a bit of cash on hand.

      • 800XL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Get a conservative business-focused person into the government and watch them give infinite money to business in the form of subsidies, bailouts, and tax breaks.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          All presidents since at least Reagan and Prolly all of them but FDR has been pro corporate welfare and each one rewarded his oligarchs with generous subsidies…

          Call it chips act or aca or covid relief etc… These are transfers from us treasury to the owner class.

          This is not a party politics issue, this is the regime policy

  • suction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you’re against cashless you’re a criminal or a tax evader, which is also criminal.

    • frippa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Amazon didnt pay a penny in taxes where i live, theyre giant criminals yet they dont need to use cash to evade taxes.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Like drugs have never been bought on card, and money washed through banks…

      It may be the case that people do not want every single step they take to be monitored as it currently is.

      You might not have a phone or be charged per use of card.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The ability to pay with cash is great just in case a country’s cashless system(s), especially the one you use the most, goes down for any reason. Gives a backup just in case you need to pay for stuff locally like at a store but your digital money is essentially in limbo until the system(s) is/are fixed.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        How often does that happen though?

        Or… what if the power goes out, you can’t pay with cash or card.

        Honestly if this is the best reason to carry cash then we should be cashless.

        • Enkrod@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Why wouldn’t I be able to pay cash without power? If people did it in BCE, I can certainly do it now.

          • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Because the equipment used to record sales uses electricity.

            Do you really think the 12yo cashier is going to get out a pad and pen and rithmatic your purchase?

            • Enkrod@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              12yo? What’re your child labor laws? Arithmetic? We’re talking simple addition here. I manned a cash register before, it’s doable even without the computer. Just takes a wee bit longer.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think it is important to have cash as a backup.

    A couple of years ago there were some issues with card reading terminals in Germany. Due to a faulty security certificate these card reading terminals were not operational for about a whole month. Many stores were affected, because they almost all use ones from the same manufacturer. The only reason why it wasn’t such a big deal was that people were carrying cash around anyway and were able to switch the method of payment easily. Having cash worked as a backup.

  • aviation_hydrated@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Totally. My petrol station allowed me to pay in seashells while everyone else were just standing around complaining, was kinda nice

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    No, that is not correct. Global outage shows the dangers of centralized systems would be a better headline. Monero Worked all day throughout the entire outage with no problems.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      … And if the systems you actually interact with go down, you can get fucked as well.

      If you want to buy food with Monero and the payment processor for the local shop doesn’t work, even if it’s a local machine sitting in the back office, you still can’t buy anything.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        A local machine sitting in the back office, acting as a payment processor, is much easier to access and fix than the Visa Network.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is not correct, either. The outage even took out decentralized platforms.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Define “worked” in this context. You mean their own infrastructure didn’t crash? You certainly didn’t pop down to the store and buying anything useful with Monero 😂

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Define “worked” in this context.

        You can still exchange funds as normal because no necessary components or intermediaries were affected by the outage. Only conventional banking systems.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not that day I didn’t, but I have bought Domino’s several times this month, and I bought my groceries at the beginning of the month.

        • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So do you use some kind of payment app that does a conversion or do you have to manually convert from Monero to fiat currency?

          Most retailers don’t accept crypto at the point of purchase so I’m curious as to how this would be convenient enough to use regularly.

    • Username@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Even central currencies can work if you can make offline and peer to peer payments.

      Not easy to pull off cryptographically, though.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Monero isn’t bad but I don’t think it is great for easily buying things. At the end of the day trying to use two different currencies is hard. Also Monero gets a bad name because it is used primarily for illegal transactions. It is simply two complex and has no accountability

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact that it’s used for crime means that it actually does what it’s supposed to do and keeping people private. Shoes are also used by bank robbers and we don’t ban shoes. Monero is a tool the same as a hammer or a shoe or a car or a gun.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Socialist scum.

      What are you going to say next, that housing is a human right? That food and water should be free? That the economic surplus should first go to the people in need?

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      The economy is so fucked i essentially interact with friends and family on a barter system anyway. I bake them cookies and cakes and they let me use their laundry machines.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Would Taler be more resilient than a typical EMV/AmEx card? It’s designed as an online payment system but it’s less centralised, so that could help.

    It’s already an attractive project due to its privacy feature, and due to it being more regulation-friendly that cryptocurrencies. If it’s resilient enough it could act as a digital cash.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      To me Taler is not a cash alternative, but a card alternative, besides cash. It’s better then cards, probably for everyone involved, but it isn’t better than cash.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Campaigners say the chaos caused by the global IT outage last week underlines the risk of moving towards a cashless society.

    Supermarkets, banks, pubs, cafes, train stations and airports were all hit by the failure of Microsoft systems on Friday, leaving many unable to accept electronic payments.

    The Payment Choice Alliance (PCA), which campaigns against the move towards a cashless society, lists 23 firms and groups, at least some of whose outlets take only credit or debit cards.

    Cash payments increased for the first time in a decade last year, according to UK Finance, which represents banks.

    The GMB Union said the outage reinforced what it had been saying for years: that “cash is a vital part of how our communities operate”.

    In March, McDonald’s, Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Gregg’s suffered problems with their payment systems.


    The original article contains 416 words, the summary contains 135 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    What good is cash gonna do if the networked cash register doesn’t open anymore?

  • prism@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Agreed. I would love to see a law requiring businesses to accept cash where possible. That sort of law already exists at state and local levels in the US, would like to see it adopted in the UK.

  • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    One problem no one has mentioned, is that it also makes life a lot harder for homeless people. I guess they need to open a bank account and start writing their account number on a cardboard.

    This actually reminds me of when I went to a restaurant a while ago. I had some physical money to spend, so I figured I’d take it with me and pay with that. At the end of the meal, while my friends paid with a card, I asked if I could pay with cash. Immediately, the waiter’s demeanor changed and he looked almost… disgusted? I don’t even know. Then he asked me in a tone that matched his expression if I didn’t have a card, and I answered something like “Well, I do, but it would be more convenient for me to pay with cash, if that’s okay”. Then he, for some reason, repeated the question, and I answered similarly. He didn’t say anything and just avoided looking at me. While a friend next to me was paying I asked again, “so, can I pay with cash?”, and without looking at me, he just barely shook his head yes. So I paid with cash, and then I awaited my 3€ change back (in my country it’s not usually custom to tip because waiters actually get paid full salaries). Eventually he came back with our receipt, but no change. I just left without saying anything - at this point I wasn’t going to argue about 3€ - but I’m most definitely not coming back to that place.

    Still don’t know what the dude’s problem was, but it did leave me wondering how are homeless people expected to pay for anything, if even a person who isn’t homeless can receive such cold treatment just for choosing to pay with cash.

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I would have ripped him a new one right there and then in front of everyone. And I would not have asked more than once, I’d just drop my share in cash on the tavel and be done with it.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are more cashless options than using banks.

      In some countries you can use phones (and phone credit, more or less) as your payment option. Doesn’t even have to be a smart phone, though that makes it easier.

      Beggers on the street with QR codes printed out. Or their phone number on cardboard.

      And in other countries, you can use the local equivalent of the Uber app instead of a bank account.

      Cashless is good. Safer for the homeless (harder to rob) and still easy to give money to them.

      • eagertolearn@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        To use phones people need to first buy them and regularly recharge them. Homeless people already have hard time to find other necessities.

        Also in some countries you don’t have any option to get any sim card and use it without first registering to your name and your address.

        For the safety aspect yes, it is harder to rob them of their money but the phones are very easy to steal.

        Cashless is only good if you already have some base level of comfort and do not care about your financial privacy. Every cashless transaction you make is recorded, tracked and sold via however many middle man you use.

        I am not saying everyone has to use cash but people should have the freedom to choose how they want to pay.

      • prism@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Username checks out.

        Let me just pull my phone out, download this money transfer app with an abysmal privacy policy. Now let me register an account and input every personal detail known to man. What’s this? I need my government issued ID? I’ll inform the beggar I’ll just pop to my house to grab it. Got my ID, now I’ll complete a liveness test because god forbid that I might be a robot. I may as well send them an ass swab because they need to “know their customer” so well. I just need to link my bank account and enter an OTP that’ll take 5 more minutes to arrive. Finally, I can donate to the beggar after messing around with a poorly printed QR code on a cardboard sign.

        OR I can just pull out my wallet and hand them a $10 note. I’m going to pick the 10 second process with fewer steps over the 30 minute process any day of the week. Having options is important, especially if your phone dies for whatever reason. A cashless society is just a way for card companies and payment processors to continue making a quick buck in the name of convenience. Both card and cash have their uses, and it should be up to the consumer to decide which to use.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s wild

      I would of given that person a piece of my mind. I don’t know about different customs but to me that’s very disrespectful. They would’ve gone with no tip or a very small one. I only tip bigger when they pass the baseline of not being rude.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not sure why you are being downvoted.

        I guess depends what you would have said…

        Either way, in the US you can just remind them they are legally obligated to take cash. Put down the cash, snap a picture and leave.

        If they call police, allow them to explain to a government official how they refused to accept the legal tender in this here country 🐸

        I generally don’t advise schooling staff but this one is disrepect of liberty, and I don’t care, they can get fucked for being a bootlicker.

        Shit is disgusting, your preference on my payment method is not a thing and you are beyond out of line with such behavior. Freedom ain’t free folks

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      In Europe it’s so much more common to use cash than card anyway, that guy was a fucking weirdo

        • shastaxc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Then why does my map have a big blob on it that says EUROPE??? Checkmate. King me.

        • Wilzax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Yeah but most of the continent is under a unifying government with a shared currency (with a few exceptions, but paying in euros implies OP is still under EU jurisdiction)

          Obviously nothing holds true for an entire region that won’t also hold true for the majority of the world, but I feel like businesses in countries that use the euro are FAR more likely to regularly accept payment in cash or even require cash than counties in any part of the Pacific hemisphere

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      One problem no one has mentioned, is that it also makes life a lot harder for homeless people.

      But to those who organise those systems, they’re not consumers with disposable income or a credit line to spend. They are happy for them to fall through the cracks and people not using cash penalises them further by eradicating charity and widening divisions.

      It is functioning as designed.

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      One problem no one has mentioned, is that it also makes life a lot harder for homeless people. I guess they need to open a bank account and start writing their account number on a cardboard.

      And you need a permanent address for a bank account. Unfortunately, that’s a feature of the cashless movement not a bug. Anything to make the lives of people experiencing homelessness harder.