cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    OK McDonald’s, I will not use your most cost effective ordering method. I guess I will just have to order my 10 individually custom cheeseburgers at the counter instead. I might have to have e the order read back, and change my mind about a few burgers.

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know about other places but they haven’t had a counter for years round here. They have big screens that you go up to to order and pay, then you get a number and pick it up when called. Even if you wanted to do this, no one is going to listen to you trying to order at the kitchen.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Entirely different country, but they still have a counter in addition to the screens; the counter is for when you want to pay cash

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      that’s just screwing with the workers though, and the workers sure as hell is not going to get paid extra for your custom order

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This viewpoint is so stupid.

        The cashier is paid to take orders, whether they take 1 long obnoxious order or 3 small orders, it’s the same shit.

        People are so swept up in ‘kindness and support’ (internet circlejerking), they think that the fact you inconvenienced some 17 year old, representing a massive corporation, as a fuck you to the company that employs them, you’ve committed some moral sin against your fellow man.

        • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That worker doesn’t want to be there, that’s likely one of 3 jobs they need to barely scrape by.

          You holding them up from doing other tasks they need to do to keep a job that barely feeds them is doing nothing but making their day a little harder. It affects the company 0%. The company is faceless and doesn’t care how much you abuse the worker bees as long as they get your money.

          I don’t know what the answer is aside from not patronizing the company at all, but I know that’s not it.

          • Lag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            If the company is always too busy, they will need to hire more workers or the existing ones will leave.

            • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I highly doubt it, if the store is too busy they’ll likely either do nothing because why would they or if it’s really bad add some robots who can handle the workload so they can get rid of those pesky employees.

              In the past few years almost all of the fast food places in the closest plaza to me have been working on a skeleton crew. Lines wrapped around the building, 2 miserable employees, upset customers, but the money is still coming in.

              Most people can’t just leave their job, even a days wage can crush a lot of people.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The company is faceless and doesn’t care how much you abuse the worker bees as long as they get your money.

            Hey now, sometimes the company employs security that’s extremely bored, incredibly racist, and looking for a low income punching bag to hassle.

        • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          the cashier

          Who is also the manager, making drinks, doing the fries because that bitch called in sick…

            • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              depends on the situation. otherwise good employee who rarely if ever is sick and works hard calls in about being unable to work? absolutely fine

              Person who i know knows exactly how many days a year over how many periods of absence it will take before HR get involved using it as a second pool of paid holiday days and leaving us high and dry to deal with the things she’s paid to help the team with then yeah, bitch

              her name was karen too…

              • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Person who i know knows exactly how many days a year over how many periods of absence it will take before HR get involved using it as a second pool of paid holiday days

                This is a dick move if you don’t tell your coworkers how to exploit the loophole too, and a heroic act if you do.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      As a former employee… That does nothing. Crazies that spend 15 min to order some fries were common.

      If you go at rush hour it can be annoying to the employee and other customers, but at the end of the day nobody will remember and you would have spent 20 min and 10 dollars (which is 9 dollars material profit for MacDonald).

      Just. Don’t. Go. To. Macdonald’s.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      On the other hand, it makes it easy to find which apps aren’t to be trusted with your data.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also very obvious when an app or website have an US and an EU version. You just know they buttfuck the Americans because no rules.

        Even Apple had to make two versions of iOS.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe graphene will find a way into duping those apps to think you have a regular android phone?

  • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I haven’t switched my phone yet, but will do so soon. Does anyone have experience with compatibility layers on phone, akin to wine? I unfortunately cannot go without my public transport apps, and they’re android or IOS only. I’ve looking into postmarket OS, but open for suggestions.

      • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Huh TIL, thanks! So would apps usually work, just like on regular android? Except the aforementioned, of course.

        • killingspark@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well yes and no. The point is to stop using Google. And that entails quite a few things you might expect a phone to do

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can take a look at calyxOS, it’s what I use. Android but with all Google telemetry ripped out. It’s not as resistant as graphene against a govt adversary, but for privacy, better battery (bc google stuff isn’t constantly running) and still being able to use everything, it works great.

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Most EVERYTHING works unless your app dev is PoS like these guys.

          Another alternative is MicroG which might work better in light of recent development.

          How zealous are you on dumping google?

    • anti-idpol action@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What public transport apps if I may ask? Most of Western Europe and especially Germany present no issues and even have OSS options, same with Finland.

      • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks for the input, i realise it’s been a while since I checked this! ÖBB Scotty, ÖBB Tickets (could forgo this one) and SBB mobile. I also need Digitales Amt (official government app for things like signing contracts without printing them, ordering your election materials to a different address than usual, checking your medical info etc). Do you happen to know whether that would work?

        • anti-idpol action@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Don’t know and sadly my Pixel got stolen recently, but you can see if Offi or Transportr meet your needs, they’re available on fdroid.

          I guess I have bad news for you regarding the government app: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/253-compatibility-for-austria-e-government-app

          Anyway depending on your threat model keeping a normiephone as a decoy and mainlining something like graphene os can be a good opsec decision.

          • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nice, thanks for the tip! Also thanks for going through the trouble of finding out for me, I appreciate it! I’m unfortunately in one of the regions where it’s specifically not available. But the second phone thing might be an option. That, or just a compatibility layer with regular old android after all.

  • yoshisaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    man, and i was gonna switch to graphene this christmas. if every app can just ban my OS, i might have to rethink this. i would use the website but they restrict so many things to apps now…

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      TBF, this is the first time I’ve encountered an app not working - and it was before this. It’s just because of Google push towards monopoly via their Play Integrity API that’s ruining this.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        play “integrity” should be considered malware, any program that deliberately does something the user doesn’t want it to should.

    • The 8232 Project@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Well, switching to GrapheneOS shows that you don’t care what those companies do and that you’re willing to fight. It means those companies lose one more customer.

    • Im_old@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was about to switch bank because for a few days my current one (inadvertently) blocked it on grapheneOS. We sent them a few emails and they fixed in less than a week.

      • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I use a small local credit union that doesn’t appear on their supported list. It’s literally the only thing holding me back, I’m tempted to say fuck it anyway. But I wonder if it might work anyway…

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Use a browser like Native Alpha or Hermit, which present a website like an app.

      And if you use Bitwarden/Vaultwarden for your passwords, it can be pretty seamless.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This makes me want to use GrapheneOS more. If the dataminers don’t want you to use it then it must be doing something right.

        • 50MYT@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Your options are:

          Apple phone

          Bloated android phone like Samsung etc.

          Chinese android phone (xiami etc)

          Google phone with Android

          Google phone with graphene. This still looks like the best of those options.

          Or no phone? I guess people are hardcore enough that will be the option.

          • zerozaku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Xiaomi has the biggest custom ROM scene out there btw despite them trying their hardest to stop bootloader unlocking. You really don’t need to have a company supporting unlocking to make ROMs for them. If they outright block it then that’s an issue.

            • Killercat103@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Is swiftphone its own thing or did you mean shiftphone? I kinda want the shiftphone 8 myself even if they only ship to neighboring countries of mine.

            • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              All of these are insecure as hell. Linux phones especially https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/linux-phones.html

              Fairphone also really fucked up: They signed their own OS with the publicly available (!) AOSP test signing keys. These guys really don’t know that they’re doing, and I would trust their hardware or software whatsoever. And no, installing a custom ROM doesn’t solve this. Considering how bad their security practices are, we genuinely have to assume that there are security issues with the device firmware as well.

              /e/OS is based on the already insecure LineageOS, and it weakens the security further, so it’s not a good option either.

              None of the options you mentioned can be compared to GrapheneOS. It’s currently the best option if you value your privacy and security. You don’t have to give Google money either, since you can just buy a used device, which is also cheaper and more environmentally friendly. Google also makes repairing their devices pretty easy for consumers and even works with iFixit. Here’s a Mastodon post I recently saw about that: https://social.linux.pizza/@midtsveen/113630773097519792

              • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                An used Pixel, assuming I can find one in my country, still costs four (4) times what I need to shell out for a in-market Lineage compatible phone.

                Theoretical security is cute, but it has to be adjusted to practical feasibility. The most secure computer in the world is useless to you if you can’t boot it up.

                • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Security-wise you’re better off using whatever OS comes with your device than downgrading to LineageOS. At least most smartphone vendors (except for Fairphone) manage to ship their Stock OS with a locked bootloader and somewhat working Verified Boot.

            • SeekPie@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t think LOS has any privacy/security improvements over the stock android?

              (IIRC) it’s even worse than stock because you can’t lock the bootloader after installation.

              Though if your phone isn’t getting official updates, it’s probably safer with LOS.

                • SeekPie@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Yeah, I myself am using CalyxOS, because DivestOS doesn’t support the Fairphone 5 unfortunately. CalyxOS also has relocking.

                • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Not with GrapheneOS, since you can entirely disable the USB controller from the settings on a driver level, making it impossible to connect the phone to a forensic data extraction device. GrapheneOS also has a convenient auto-reboot feature, which (together with their patches to the Linux kernel and Fastboot recovery OS to include memory zeroing) erases the encryption keys from memory, putting the device in BFU state and requiring the PIN/password to unlock. This is additionally secured by the Titan M2 secure element, which makes use of the Weaver API and drastically throttles brute-force unlock attempts. https://grapheneos.org/faq#encryption

              • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                (IIRC) it’s even worse than stock because you can’t lock the bootloader after installation.

                That’s a problem with the phone manufacturer, not with Lineage.

          • ryannathans@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Someone installing graphene os for security shouldn’t be trusting random second/third/etc hand hardware lol

              • XTL@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Hypothetically the hardware could have been modified, but that would take some insane level of a determined attacker to be fabricating modified pixels just to sell them on the used market.

                • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Nothing too hypothetical nor an “insane” level of work. Didn’t Israel do just that with some beepers to blow up children?

                • Anivia@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yes, this would only be a concern for targeted attacks by state actors, in which case not even buying new would be safe.

                  Thinking about it, in such a scenario buying used may even be safer

                • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It also comes with a hardware auditor, although you need another trusted graphene phone to use it. I don’t know about the details, but sounds very hard to mess with it.

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Shouldn’t trust anything then. They could intercept your new phone and modify it. They did it for switches. But your not worth it for “them”.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s only officially supported on google phones because sadly those are the only ones that are not modified to fuck which makes installing and supporting other OS’es way too much work.

        Giving google money once for a device is not a problem from a privacy or security standpoint.

        • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Wish they’d at least support Fairphone.

          If Graphene reached out to them I bet Fairphone would even actively work with them to make it an official OS option.

        • Samsy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s correct, but not the reason grapheneOS chooses only pixel phones. It’s the level of hardware security features.

          • XTL@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Also unlockable and presumably has well working builds. It’s not just graphene, but just about every Android project it there that’s best supported on pixels. Other manufacturers have a crazy variety of locking schemes and required tools. Each one is a nightmare to support.

            • orange@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              For GrapheneOS, it’s primarily that it’s re-lockable. That’s why other unlockable phones aren’t supported.

              The GrapheneOS install process sets new OS signing keys so you can lock the phone again and get full verified boot. However, most manufacturers haven’t implemented this feature.

              • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                What do you get, app/feature wise for verified boot vs. Play integrity app? Does it increase the amount of apps that work on it?

                • orange@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No, Play Integrity intentionally checks if it’s a Google-approved key. Android itself has an API to check verified boot and gives info on the signing key - most devs just want to know verified boot is working.

                  I feel Play Integrity has a short life ahead of if competition authorities realise how exactly it works. “Anti-competitive” is the first thing policy-minded folks think when I explain the API to them.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If a business makes it too difficult to use them I just use someone else. I’m sure they understand that but are making a killing at the expense of other people.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There will come a day when there are no alternatives. Ive hit this in many places (EU banks, dating sites, etc)

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fuck both of these companies. Never used McDicks app in the first place. Spyware bullshit.

  • Roopappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why would anyone load an app from McDonalds? You want to give them elevated access to your most personal data for a few dollars of coupons?

    What are they taking from you that’s worth more than the discounts they are giving you? Because they are definitely making a profit, or they wouldn’t be doing it.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We are definitely in the era where people think discounts before user privacy. I bet most of people downloading the Mcdonald app do it exactly because of cheeper prices and easy of access.

      • dharmik@linuxusers.in
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        just had medium fries and coke. i and many i know use the mc D app because of the discounts it gives when i order through my app.

      • dharmik@linuxusers.in
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        just had medium fries and coke. i and many i know use the mc D app because of the discounts it gives when i order through my app.

      • dharmik@linuxusers.in
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        just had medium fries and coke. i and many i know use the mc D app because of the discounts it gives when i order through my app.

      • dharmik@linuxusers.in
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        just had medium fries and coke. many people i know, including myself, use the mcd app because of the discounts it offers when ordering through the app. however, i am under the impression that since i use an ios device and have the option to decline being tracked by the app—which i very eagerly press “no” to—i am on the safe side. am i?

        • pound_heap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Apple does extensive audit of mobile apps, including limitations of tracking. So the app cannot spy on something you are not letting it to know. But you are giving it a bunch of info voluntarily.

          I’d say using that app on iOS is similar to making a food delivery order using a loyalty member ID. Basically, you are letting the company (McDonald’s) know who you are, what is your phone number, where do you live, and what do you like to eat. And if they wish to, they could use all that to purchase your profile from a data brocker. Or they can sell that info for a few cents to make up on that discount.

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is this not a sign of the true intentions on both sides of the dilemma here!?!?
    Let us go to the end. We cannot afford to carry on in fear of these bans. Let the lines be neatly placed and the sides chosen wisely. If sustained profits are desired, the walled-gardens must come down.

    Vote with your dollar and vote again with your data. Wary, but never afraid is the motto privacy comrades!

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed. Leave immediately to other services, and tell them why you’re leaving. It might not make a dent, but you’ll be doing the right thing at least.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Authy has been utter garbage for a long time and if you ever needed a reason to migrate away then now is as good as ever.

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Banks seem to be hit or miss, happy that mine works. Would rather switch Banks than use a stock Rom, though.

    All the Uber stuff works in Browser, both eats and their fake taxi stuff.

    Not having a subtle reminder to eat at McDonald’s is probably better for you.

    Honestly, if your app could be a website, and includes services not on your website, fuck you, I’m gonna go to the competition.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Use the websites whenever you can. That’s what I do at least. Although I had to stop using Lyft entirely, because they stopped supporting rides from their website apparently. And that leaves just Uber. I actually left my bank for a similar reason. It supported my phone just fine, and it worked without Google Play Services, but the website wouldn’t let me do everything that the app would, and the app required that I have Aurora Store to download their banking app from the Google Play Store, and I wanted to get away from that, so I switched banks so that I could use the bank website instead. From what I can tell, you run into this kind of stuff a lot with FinTech apps. But if you use older banks, like Discover or Wells Fargo or things like that, they tend to work better. Maybe because they’re not up with the newest technology, LOL.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      lol, I’ve observed the same.
      Fancy “Digital Wallet” thingy is absolutely decked out in Root detection, meanwhile my older, physical bank’s app doesn’t give a fuck.

      I’ve never been too fond on the idea of a 100% digital bank so no loss for me!

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah Revolut is also the kinda app that is almost only a mobile app, not much you can do with their website, last i checked.