🖕 Fuck PayPal

And fuck Linus Tech Tips for intentionally keeping quiet about this after they found out.

  • pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Honestly I thought all of this was common knowledge at this point, back when I used Honey (many years ago) I saw its affiliate code in the address bar and thought “huh, that’s how they make money”

    • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I remember researching it a while ago when I was curious how they made money. If anything else, this just illustrated glee little research and care people have with their online information.

  • jagermo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    215
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I said it in another post: if you see a bunch of influencers all suddenly peddling the same stuff, stay away. All of them can be bought.

      • archonet@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Am I the only one who, upon seeing his videos for the first time, immediately thought he was an annoying little pinhead?

        Like, I’ve watched his channel(s) surge in popularity over the years, and this entire time I’ve just been wondering why, and the issues that have come out about his little empire since have only confirmed my initial prejudice.

        • stardust@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Their entire video is an ad filled experience of shilling not only their sponsors but themselves. Incredibly obnoxious and cramming in every YouTube stereotype from begging for likes and subs to clickbait titles and then insisting they have to do it so they can have their cake and eat it makes them even more obnoxious than if they just did it without wanting to be forgiven for it.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It’s getting worse, I can’t remember who but I was watching a video just the other day and their ad segment was the fucking ltt ratchet driver. You know, the one they supposedly made because they were tired of the market and the low quality rip-offs all the companies were just trying to make profit off of (it’s a shitty plastic screwdriver for 70$, link to pic and it’s being sold at fucking walmart now). They sold it as such a heart string story in the beginning, it’s just another mini-wannabe corporation.

            I don’t particularly feel bad at this point for their continued reputation downfall and the people responsible. Everyone has their own personal story of their favorite company which has turned to complete shit (Blizzard is one of mine). They didn’t come out strong but doubled down corporate style when everything started. That’s fine, but anyone staying and putting up with the stressful workplace knows what they’ve gotten themselves into.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              That’s actually a very nice screwdriver. Nice ratchet screw drivers do cost that much. I have one, but given where LTT is these days as a company, I don’t recommend buying it.

              I would be very happy if creators were able to fund their operations off their own merch rather than outside advertising. That seems to be what Gamers Nexus does, or at least heading that way. What LTT does, though, is use it as an additional revenue source on top of their other advertising sources. Doing it right means resisting the urge to consume more and more, and LTT is not capable of that.

            • CybranM@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I have a few gripes with LTT but the screwdriver is legit good. A bit overpriced because of the branding sure but definitely not a throwaway product

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              Oh please attack them on actual grounds rather than a made-up nonsense. The screwdriver is actually decent product if you care about that sort of thing. No one’s getting scammed there, It’s an actual product that’s of relatively good quality.

              If you don’t care about screwdrivers then you’re probably not interested in the product anyway and if you are a frequent screwdriver user you probably understand why it’s a good product.

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I used to think the importance of leadership at the top of a company to be overblown since they succeed based on the work of all of the employees, but it is pretty amazing how fast a change to shitty leadership can run a successful company into the ground.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Because of his name, I thought he was a pro-Linux channel. I was swiftly disappointed.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I have nothing clever to say here, so normally I’d let my upvote express my feelings, but that feels inadequate in this case. I just wanted to use my words to let you know that this comment amused me a great deal and to thank you.

          • Canadian_Cabinet @lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            31 minutes ago

            He once bricked his OS during a “run Linux for a week” challenge. He tried to do apt install steam or something and ignored a bunch of warnings. Of course he then bashed Linux because he didn’t pay attention

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 minutes ago

              Yeah, I didn’t see that video, but I recall reading about it. Apparently the package manager warned him that something would be potentially destructive and he ignored the warning, then blamed Linux for it when it was destructive.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I’m not exactly sure what you’re saying here, so I apologize if I’m misinterpreting, but - while I have many potential complaints about Linus - I don’t blame him for his name resembling the word “Linux.”

        • HornedMeatBeast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I got that creepy feeling from him the first time I saw a video of him. Every photo of him I saw set off alarms. I’ve also never understood why anyone even likes the guy.

          This was years before all the issues came to light.

        • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          I’m with you. I heard of him on Reddit forever ago and couldn’t get through a single video.

      • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        What annoys me the most is since his last drama, Linus HAS to be the face in every video now! Wtf it used to be a bunch of them took turns making videos, and it was fun seeing everyone work on different things. He has to be front and get all the attention, it just feels weird now.

      • deur@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Especially anything from NullDrive, they’re a very scummy group.

    • lemmeout@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I have a built-in spidey sense that hates any product that gets peddled simultaneously by a bunch of YouTubers.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They whore for corpos, that’s who pays them

      Some do good work but got to assume they are an enemy until proven otherwise.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    178
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I never trusted Honey to begin with but this goes far deeper than I ever expected. I always wondered “yeah, but where do they get their money?” I always figured it was just a way to take people’s data and sell it to data brokers (which they probably also do, let’s be honest) but this is just blatant fraud. Stealing affiliate money from links and having companies pay them to purposefully give out worse coupon codes is just devious through and through. It’s basically free money and everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah I always wondered what the catch was? The CEO was always posting on Reddit trying to defend honey and how cool they were.

      Either way, I never trust any shopping deal plugins. The whole idea of them is sketchy.

      • Electric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Only shopping plugin I use is the one that comes with Edge. Surprisingly good to track price history and find other sites selling the product. I considered some Chrome plugin that displays an Amazon product’s country of origin to avoid Chinesium but apparently it didn’t work well or something like that from reading the reviews. Had some attached rewards function for shopping with it, ick.

        • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          20 hours ago

          There’s a good one for Amazon called Keepa that shows you the price history of the item. Helps a ton keeping prices in check during sales like Prime Day to see how much you are actually saving, if anything.

          Also nice to see how much you could potentially save if you just wait for the next sale or if there was already a price decrease. Often times it looks like I’m good buying without waiting for any sale as the sales only knocked off a few dollars, at most.

          • Electric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Thank you for the recommendation, looks neat. Tracking prices of different conditions is a nice touch. I’ll have to scrutinize it further when I make my next online purchases and chuck it into Edge as I made that my dedicated shopping browser.

        • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s funny how Edge got lambasted for it when they introduced that feature, but it’s legitimately super helpful and non-invasive.

          • Electric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            38 minutes ago

            I had no idea it was, I don’t keep up with browser news. I just wish they didn’t migrate to Chromium. It became my main browser for a brief period before that.

            I just used it randomly when I was working and doing some shopping for a computer in my downtime and decided to try out the feature. That and the AI are super good when combo’ed to shop smart. Managed to save $800 off a quality laptop.

      • reev@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        https://keepa.com/!

        I use this extension to get a general idea of whether a product usually goes for cheaper and whether or not to wait. Really conveniently on the Amazon page directly.

    • Electric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I always assumed it was a combination of your guess and companies giving Honey special coupon codes so consumers are more eager to spend.

      “Hey Honey, we’ll give you 1% commission if you just host this HONEY5 coupon for 5% off.”

      That was my impression when I used it once. Wasn’t worth having an extension just for a slight discount. Love when a company doesn’t fulfill the service they advertise.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        But that would be an ethical business model, we can’t have that, this is PayPal and this is the internet. There’s no place for ethics in that combination.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

      Enshittification correctly defined.

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Same. I never downloaded it or anything like it but I didn’t realize they were playing both sides. It’s fucked.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If you’re sitting at a poker table and you can’t tell who the sucker is, it’s you.

    Alternately, if you look at an online service and can’t tell what the product is, It’s you.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And even if you can tell what the product is, it‘s still often you. “Premium” subscriptions for example might hide (some) ads, but services still collect as much data about you. Even grocery stores where the offer seems obvious are trying to bait you into installing their apps to collect data on top of charging you for every item. And sure it’s not relevant in this case, but it’s something we should never forget.

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I think the issue was with the original commenter’s phrasing. Facebook looks like a product. But the commenter meant “How the product is being funded”.

          Of course, it gets hard when there’s multiple sources of revenue. You used to be able to spot ads and come to the conclusion that that was everything. Now an ad is just the tip of the iceberg.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah, I feel like that’s usually a very accurate saying, but it doesn’t really work with a lot of open source projects.

        I hate that you’re getting downvoted by so many people who don’t realize you’re pointing out an exception to the rule, and instead think you have some fundamental misunderstanding about how Linux works.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          It’s difficult for others to take advantage of you when you can learn what the software actually does and have it modified to work another way.

          Linux (for the most part) is open source but I’d argue the inclusion of any proprietary software/firmware/drivers means something ultimately isn’t.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          They are getting downvoted for misconstruing something that is clearly a rule about profit making services and applying it to crowd sourced non-profit open source projects.

          Truly open source projects don’t have suckers.

          • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            misconstruing something that is clearly a rule about profit making services

            To be honest I don’t think that’s clear at all, it feels like it’s more a rule about being skeptical of free stuff online. And many for profit companies have open source projects that can be used safely even though the source is a for-profit.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Linux is neither an online service, nor a business at all.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I mean, yes?

        The key difference is linux wants you to help make it better. Something like Honey steals your data, and steals money from others, and then wants you to make it better.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Except Linux has proper legal underpinnings that anyone with a few brain cells can verify.

        You can compile your own code too

        Hence why people always say do your diligence

    • pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There is no such thing as a free and benevolent product with an advertising budget.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Free and benevolent maybe not. but genuine and non malicious?

        “What’s your business model?” “we make and sell delicious sandwiches. Customer buys the sandwich for a little mote than it costs to make so we get money for ourselves.” That isn’t a scam.

        • pixelscript@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Correct. It’s not a scam. Because it’s not free. The sandwich had a price posted, you paid it, you received the product. Valid business model.

          What would you think instead if you saw a NYT front page ad taken out for Free Sandwich Mart, the all-you-can-eat totally free sandwich emporium?

          Or in this case, a free browser extension that paid to sponsor five thousand YouTube videos that promises to help you pay less money to every store you activate it on at no cost to you?

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            Yes. Which is why, when you see a novel service being advertised, it is a useful exercise to ask of them “What is your business model?”

          • snooggums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            They have a budget spent on advertising on wikipedia itself, plus the cost of the emails they send out asking for donations.

        • amzd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Their advertisement budget is collected by guilt tripping Wikipedia users using the lie that the website would cease if they didn’t ”donate”.

    • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Real as shit. I know idiots who think apple pays people scaling on how many downloads their app has xD (kinda like yt views)

  • criticon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I used honey for a while and it was working great for me with “exclusive” coupons and Cashback and then one time I bough a cellphone that was supposed to have $250 cashback. I did all the necessary steps, read the t&c, took screenshots of the offer and made the purchase. I never got the transaction to appear on their website. Sending emails it trying to contact them was futile (I even made an automatic script to send an email everyday to follow up). Fuck PayPal

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah, it’s wild how close PayPal came to killing Minecraft early on by locking all of Notch’s money as soon as MC started to take off.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        In certain countries they fall under quasi-bank regulations eg. “PayPal Australia Pty Ltd (PayPal) is a limited Authorised Deposit-Taking Institution (ADI) with authority to provide purchased payment facilities (PPFs).”

        That gives some measure of protection on how they handle your funds, but holy shit I would not keep any money in a PayPal account for any longer than absolutely necessary. I use it as a convenient intermediary between my actual card and sellers, no more than that.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      So glad that eBay (as greedy as they are) started handling transactions instead of everyone using PayPal.

  • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I thought it was just collecting and selling user data but while I’d bet it’s still happening - wow, this is way craftier.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If something advertises on youtube it’s a scam. Simple to remember really.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I don’t mind things that are an actual thing to buy. I want to research it first–you can get a better electric razor than Manscaped for not much more–but at least it’s clear how they make their money. Honey was obviously getting money from someone other than their users, and that’s an immediate red flag.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeah. PayPal bought a coupon browser extension for how much? If the only thing they do is save YOU money, how come they can afford a sponsored segment in a mr beast video?

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        I and many other people naturally assumed that honey was getting their money from consumer data collection. Which is why I didn’t use the service myself. The surprise is the fact that the scam isn’t just consumer data collection but actually stealing commissions from content creators as well as using consumers as a gateway to stealing money from businesses that they have contracts with.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      This isn’t even remotely true. There are lots of advertisers and sponsors that aren’t scams. But unfortunately our consumer protection laws haven’t quite caught up to the digital marketplace. So there is a lot of room on the internet in general for scammy behavior.

      As always, it’s buyer beware. As well as a big amount of content creator beware as well.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        51 minutes ago

        It…is? You’re copying digital content without paying for it. I use uBlock but I don’t pretend to have the moral high ground.

        • sardaukar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 minutes ago

          It’s… not? It’s protection against malware and profiling by shady companies.

      • themakara@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Have you ever heard his full stance on the matter? Because he clearly stated that this is not a judgment against using it. Heck, he’s been open about having sailed the high seas himself and still doing so for media he physically owns.

        It’s just that gaining access to media while circumventing the payment (ads in this case) is basically piracy. Which is fair.

        Signed, A uBlock User

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      OP isn’t exactly giving you the full story there. I know for a fact I’ve seen a video on this. I remember thinking at the time “well duh”.

    • galanthus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It was a matter of time until the public found out about this. They couldn’t think in the long term, by not accepting a bit of backlash, exposing the scam they unknowingly participated in they only opened themselves up for more later.

      They are not only evil, they are stupid too, which is worse.

  • Electric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Pretty sure this was already posted yesterday when it came out. Or it might have been a different community.

    Watching the full video is important though because they are scamming the consumer too, not just “”“influencers”“”. Someone made a great comment about how it’s just one greedy troll stealing from another and has no effect on the consumer since they still save money but Honey not actually giving you the best coupons on purpose is next level dickholery.

    Lying about the coupons really should be the focus so people stop harming themselves using Honey.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      See, I’m torn. I’ve never used honey, so I was never scammed. However I do think them scamming consumers is awful.

      Buuuuuuuut, I DO enjoy the fact that they scammed influencers.

      • Electric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah I thought that too until seeing the bits about consumers getting shafted. Awful company, hope they get sued into bankruptcy.

    • kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s also kind of a protection racket against shops. “Partner with us or we’ll cut into your profits by spreading cheap coupon codes, but partner with us and we’ll protect you”

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I never use affiliate links AND I don’t bother looking for coupons (let’s be honest, who does?) so I don’t give a crap, every now and then I’m saving money without taking it from anyone 🤷

      • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        idk, I find the coupon thing to be super easy. Just takes one search and maybe two clicks if you have ad blockers on. Mostly the only time is if I’m ordering something like pizza for a get together where no special applies. There’s a local chain in my state that had a coupon code for half off my order that wasn’t listed on their site (they might’ve given it to me if I called but who knows). Been using that for the past year and it allows me to convince everyone to go there instead of a national chain. I’ve also been lucky with some manufacturers coupons for products I’m ordering straight from them, it’s more rare though so it’s hit or miss sometimes.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I just look up price trends and that’s pretty much it for me too. Coupons rarely ever worked for me in the early days of e-commerce so I quickly stopped bothering.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Was it all that surprising to you though?

      By the time honey hit the scene we had been ten years into “sketchy Browser extension that monitors your browsing habits and injects ads”

      I guess getting flogged by your favorite influencer ads a veneer of legitimacy for a lot of people.

        • eRac@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Rakuten is up front about it. They force their affiliate links, then pay you part of their cut.

          Honey forces their affiliate links in exchange for maybe finding you a discount code.

          • gt5@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I also think Rakuten compensates me fairly. I take the payout in Amex points. Instead of money they give me 1 cent per point which I can leverage to a value of around 5 cpp through transfers

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I never trust browser extensions outside of a select few. However, I have used Paypal quite a bit. I would think many of us have.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    20 hours ago

    At this point, anything these goons “influencers” try to sell me on is a scam, and I’ll avoid it at all costs. People do insane things for money. Just watched a coffeezilla video on the CSGO gambling scam and holy shit, people are straight up heartless and have no humanity in them.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They didn’t hide it, but a huge portion of their audience doesn’t read the forums. A 10 minute video of Linus ranting about them would have opened this scandal to a wider audience years ago.

      • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Linus usually likes to rant about it on the WAN show then they usually make a clip for YouTube, but weird he didn’t do that for honey, maybe he didn’t know how far the scam went.

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 hours ago

          As creator that makes some of their profits from affiliate links, I don’t see how that could be the case for him.

          Seems more likely they had a reason to avoid beef with PayPal.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        There may have been non-disclosure agreements between Linus tech tips and PayPal Honey. They may have threatened to sue him if he went public. I’m assuming we’ll find out the details in the next few weeks.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, that not nothing but it isn’t far off. They have a massive platform. It deserved at least a video telling people about it.

    • poke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT. I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on, I think their forum post was good and I believe they even mentioned this functionality of Honey a few times on the WAN show. It wasn’t a secret, and anyone who cared to do in-depth research on a potential sponsor could have found out.

      • sardaukar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        And yet here’s the scandal being exposed TWO YEARS LATER. Yeah, LTT couldn’t possibly have handled this better… /s