• Cataphract@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Here’s my dilemma:

    • Been without cell service since the pandemic (eventually stopped using the smart phone altogether)
    • All my digital needs are satisfied, devices and functionality in every room for every purpose I need
    • Have multiple forms of solid and satisfactory communication channels (don’t need a cell number)

    I’ve thought about buying a model I could jailbreak, but again it’s just to use a system that’s abusive. “Download our app!”, “Use our digital coupons!”, “Link your phone number!”, “Scan our code!”, “Let us track your location for your convenience!”.

    I’m really a niche subgroup though, I already need other devices while at work that a phone wouldn’t suffice for. I kinda see more people going this route though. If your transportation has a computer, then what’s the endpoint in carrying a phone? If your job requires digital devices, the phone is basically reduced to a large brick of a communication device. I see more and more equipment being specialized and having added communication aspects for more complicated machinery, cell phones are not going to keep up with it in a general sense.

    tldr: cell phones are just a fad with an abusive system that will die out one day and be remembered like rotary phones. They’re generally subpar for any specific task and are only a place holder till we figure out better systems.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You can. Ditch Apple and join us. Plenty of small phone selections here on the other side.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Seriously.

    I don’t want a tablet in my pocket all day.

    I bought my current phone because it was small and the options I had when looking for small phones were extremely limited.

    I’m not trying to seriously game on a smartphone. I’m not trying to watch full length movies. It’s in my pocket 90% of the time. I want it to be small.

  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Why is the article using diagonal screen size as their measurement for phone size? In that case you could have a phone the exact same size get “bigger” just because bezel sizes have shrunk over the years.

    They specifically call out the iPhone SE as a “small phone” that they seem to want. But the newest iPhone, the iPhone 16 is only 6% bigger in width and height. Fractions of an inch larger. I can totally understand why somebody would want a phone with smaller overall dimensions, but why on earth would your metric for an ideal phone be a smaller screen?

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Bigger screens mean bigger and more obtrusive ads.

    I’m convinced this is 90% of the reason right here.

  • BlueBaggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Why can’t we go back to small phones”

    Company releases small phone

    “No one” buys it

    Company stops making small phones

    People complaining why there are no small phones

  • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I believe I saw where you hear that people want small phones, they make them, and then they sell poorly. So, to the company at least, it doesn’t look like people want the smaller devices.

    Now, I saw some comments in here about the smaller devices usually being less robust than their normal/pro counterparts, and that could also be a major reason small phones don’t sell.

  • ray1992xd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    There is a feature called single hand mode on most keyboards. Makes it something like this. I do however agree that small phones are nice.Screenshot of smartphone keyboard in single hand mode.

  • User79185@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I do, I bought smallest phone available from known company. But most of those companies just decided you need huge phone that can’t fit everywhere, removed sdcard slot, removed headphone jack. Last time I remember nobody asked them to remove those features. I think it is the same enshittification like with everything, they no longer make cheap houses, smaller cheaper cars, actual budget gpus etc, etc. Feels like every company targets top 20% and the rest - gtfo and be damned.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Answering single handed on me iPhone 12 mini on latest iOS 😇

    It is a great small phone!

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I don’t want a small phone or a slide out keyboards.

    I want :
    Replaceable battery.
    Non glass back.
    3.5 jack.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      3.5 jack is easy, most budget phones have them (along with a MicroSD card slot)

      The replaceable battery? That’s gonna be hard to find. There the obvious Fairphone, but its very costly for its specs and is only made for EU, and even if someone from the US imports it, the only US carrier allowing it is Tmobile.

      Samsung Galaxy XCover series have IP67 Water resistance, headphone jack, and MicroSD card slot, and the replaceable battery, but its specs are not that good for its cost (as reported by various Reddit users).

      I wouldn’t trust the water resistance tho. One drop into a puddle and the back comes off exposing the internals.

      • SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The xcovers backs usually stay on when you drop them and the back only really holds the battery in. The internals are protected by another layer of plastic.

        As you say the specs do suck though.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      3.5 jack.

      They exist, but it’ll constrain your phone choices a lot.

      I’d just get a USB-C-to-1/8"-TRS adapter. If you want to charge while playing, you can get one with passthrough.

      Without passthrough:

      https://www.amazon.com/Anker-Adapter-Female-Samsung-Devices/dp/B08Z3B5QL3

      or with passthrough:

      https://www.amazon.com/ZOOAUX-Headphone-Charging-Earphones-Compatible/dp/B094Z6149B

      Can probably just leave the thing plugged into your headphones.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Just leave it plugged into the headphones, don’t even take it off. I mean, I have 1/4 inch audio hardware, and I’ve got 1/8 inch headphones that have a 1/8 inch to 1/4 inch adaptor that just lives on the end.

          I totally understand people who want to use wired, TRS headphones. They’re inexpensive, widespread, aren’t going to become e-waste when their battery dies, aren’t going to become obsolete when radio protocols move on, are lightweight, don’t suffer from radio interference etc. I have a bunch of TRS headphones and like them. Only downside is that they need some power source if you want to do ANC, but it’s not like one has to have ANC.

          But…I think that a lot of people are treating it as a “we live in a Bluetooth world or a wired headphones world, and which we do depends on whether there’s a TRS jack on the phone itself”.

          I’d also add that if you have a USB-to-TRS device acting as your DAC, you can swap in others, aren’t stuck with the on-phone DAC. I had a phone that had an extremely obnoxious tendency to, when charging in the car, play noise back through the headphones jack (and thus to my car’s aux jack and through the speakers). Was fine on Bluetooth. Problem was that the manufacturer had failed to stick the proper filtering circuitry in the power supply for the DAC and was spewing noise from USB power into the audio output, probably because you couldn’t see a problem when the phone was running on battery and filtering circuitry for the DAC uses up space in the cramped confines of the phone. (In practice, USB power can be amazingly dirty – I was astonished watching some people with oscilloscopes look at the power lines on USB.) Anyway, the noise was appalling. If you use the built-in DAC, you can’t really change the thing out. With an external DAC, you can stick a reasonable one in.

          I don’t know how the ones I linked to above perform. But I’m confident that if they are a problem, there are other DACs out there. Whereas with a built-in jack, you get the DAC that the phone manufacturer provides, and clearly some are willing to ship their phones with an inadequate DAC.

          I’d kind of like to see someone set up a rig with intentionally-dirty USB power and a bunch of USB audio interfaces and USB-powered devices with an audio output and then see how much noise leaks through into the DAC’s output.

          EDIT: I also had a (purely analog) audio mixer at one point that used USB power and also leaked audible – not as bad as my phone in the car – noise from the USB power source into the audio. Solved that by moving it from my computer’s USB output to a dedicated USB charger. I’m sure that there’s still leakage and if I were doing pro audio work with that hardware, I’d still be looking at it, but at least it isn’t easily-perceptible to me any more.

          I think that it might be underappreciated how bad the DAC situation in home electronics is. I haven’t seen people trying to measure and quantify it. I have seen lots of people going to great lengths to measure frequency response on headphones, whether or not a cable has (probably completely unnecessary) shielding, and worry about the encoding of their music and sometimes even its encoding for wireless transmission to headphones over Bluetooth. But “how much junk is leaking into the DAC’s output” seems to be a curiously un-measured area.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    There were benefits to the comically-large form factor, though. Touch keyboards worked significantly better with larger screens,

    No, the tiny soft-keyboard on my old Galaxy Xcover is significantly easier to type than any modern phone. Less movement of the finger, easier targeting of the buttons. I’m always surprised anew, each time i dust it off and play with it.