Back in the medieval ages when a woman was married to a man, they were basically considered property for my understanding and treated like an extension of the man’s person and family. So it was customary for women to take the man’s last name since they were being joined to his family. But now here in the 21st century women are fully independent and last names don’t really seem to mean much of anything. I mean what is Smith or McGregor or any last name really mean anymore? Especially in the digital age, lots of people have digital usernames like SarahSmith1727373. So the last name clearly doesn’t mean much anymore… Which leads me to wonder, why do the majority of women still take the man’s last name? Especially when some of them have a horrible last name? I have seen some butt ass ugly last names recently, like Fink, Weimer, Slotsky/Slotsky, Hiscock (no joke this is a last name), Hardman… And then you hear the woman’s name and it’s like something way more reasonable and less stupid sounding like Kingman, or Harrison, Walls, etc.

  • klemptor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I didn’t change my name. My perspective is that my identity doesn’t change just because I got married. My name has been mine since birth and it’ll remain that way.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    23 hours ago

    My wife did, despite me saying I’d rather she not. Me changing to her name was not legally possible in our situation (me US citizen, her JP citizen, both living in and married in Japan). (Edit: What I wanted to do was change to her name, but that doesn’t happen unless I give up US and my other citizenship, apply for and get JP citizenship, and choose her maiden name as my name or do that but a name combining hers and the sound from the start of mine rendered in kanji).

    Her reasoning was that we could quickly and easily remove basically all doubt that we are related with just what ID we both always carry. Her usecase was one of us being critically injured or something and being able to gain access in the hospital or something else like that.

  • SybilVane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m from a different culture than my husband and my last name was a bureaucratic nightmare. Almost didn’t make it into university because of computer mix ups, have had issues filing taxes, voting, getting a passport, settings basic IDs, getting insurance… It’s endless. Changed my name as soon as I could, and even THAT process was hindered by my original name.

    Bonuses: Distance myself from social media I had as a child. Harder for former stalkers to locate me if they decide to rekindle their previous obsessions. Don’t need to upset one set of grandparents when you name your children one parent’s last name and not the other. People stop asking me where I’m from and making racist assumptions about me. Everyone seems a lot friendlier now that they assume I’m [insert European white race here] instead of [insert non-white race here] and that’s despite the fact that I’m clearly white. Racism is wild. My signature is way shorter.

    Not saying this should be the norm, but I was happy it was a socially acceptable option for me.

  • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Pew Research has survey data germane to this question. As it stands, a clear majority (79%) of opposite-sex married women changed their family/last name to their husband’s.

    But for never-married women, only a third (33%) said they would change their name to their spouse’s family name. 24% of never-married women were unsure whether they would or wouldn’t change their name upon marriage.

    From this data, I would conclude that while the trend of taking the husband’s last name is fairly entrenched right now, the public’s attitude are changing and we might expect the popularity of this to diminish over time. The detailed breakdown by demographic shows that the practice was less common (73%) in the 18-49 age group than in the 50+ age group (85%).

    Pew Research name change data

    However, some caveats: the survey questions did not inquire into whether the never-married women intended on ever getting married; it simply asked “if you were to get married…”. So if marriage as a form of cohabitation becomes less popular in the future, then the change-your-family-name trend could be in sharper decline than this data would suggest.

    Alternatively, the data could reflect differences between married and never-married women. Perhaps never-married women – by virtue of not being married yet – answered “would not change name” because they did not yet know what their future spouse’s name is. No option for “it depends on his name” was offered by the survey. Never-married women may also more-strongly consider the paperwork burden – USA specific – for changing one’s name.

    So does this help answer your question? Eh, only somewhat. Younger age and left-leaning seem to be factors, but that’s a far cry from cause-and-effect. Given how gradual the trend is changing, it’s more likely that the practice is mostly cultural. If so, then the answer to “why is cultural practice XYZ a thing?” is always “because it is”.

    • DuckWrangler9000@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks for providing this really detailed and interesting reply. Lots of good insight here. For the ‘Postgraduate degree’ group, I wonder if they’re dramatically higher due to the frustrating problems associated with name changes? Like if you publish an academic paper with your full name, you can’t easily go back and change it, so that may affect it… huh.

      • ChaosCoati@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have friends who published before being married, so now professionally still use their own last name (for continuity) but socially will go by their husband’s last name.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My mother kept her last name. There was never an issue at school etc. I run into more issue now, everyone thinks my uncle (mom’s brother) is my dad because of the last names.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Well, my last name isn’t my mom’s last name, it’s my dad’s, and her last name was her dad’s, then her husband’s. So why do I care, I don’t get a matrilineal name anyway.

    I hyphenated, because we both had kids when we got married, and it made it easier to deal with the school stuff for my stepkids.

    Otherwise, I really just don’t care because my family name is my dad’s name and it was only my mom’s name because she changed hers to his. Not that I didn’t care about my dad, was closer to him than my mom. I just mean I don’t feel like it means anything.

    ETA: as the OP says, though - I really, truly don’t understand it when a lady has a cool last name and the man an awful one and they still use his. I used to work at a payroll place and saw this happen over and over, someone would be calling up for us to change their last name from, say, Valiant or DeLeon to Assing, or Fuckler or something . Really, why wouldn’t he be the one happy to change in that scenario?

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I suspect a lot of women despite not wanting to be considered property, still place value on belonging with their partner. The western tradition of the man being the figurative head of household is still pretty prevalent. These two factors (and more, I’m sure) likely have some influence.

  • 4vr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    தமிழ்
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    This isn’t a thing in India unless there is a ‘value’ in the surname.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t India also use a system where your marriage is set up 30 years ahead of time while your mom is still pregnant with you?

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m a fan of the hyphen strategy. I really don’t wanna change my last name just cause I fell in love. But hyphenation sounds like a good compromise.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Hmm but what do you do if your name is already hyphenated? You can’t just keep bolting names together so that’s not a solution for more than one generation.

      • Toes♀@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You do make a fair point. I just imagined someone trying to fit their entire genealogy on their ID like Daenerys Targaryen.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s tradition in my country but not mandatory. The archaic government system is also easier to navigate through if a married couple have same the last name. Because it’s so common for a wife to take her husband’s last name, it immediately raises eyebrows when people claim to be married but have different surnames. In our case, my wife took my last name because she just likes it better than hers. It’s neutral and easier to pronounce.

  • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Having the same last name is just an easy way to show togetherness and unity. My wife kept her last name because she earned her MD with it but she’s fine going by Mrs. (my last name) in a parental setting.

  • ValiantDust@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    To all the people here arguing that it’s easier to have a family name, especially with children: It’s also possible that the husband takes the wife’s name. But from anecdotal evidence in my acquaintance, most men are very opposed to this idea. So if the woman wants a family name she has to change her name or have endless fights about it. That’s why most women I know did it.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Having one name is easier for social reasons. Going with the man’s name is easier for social reasons.

      It all comes down to social pressure to keep the status quo. I even offered to take my wife’s last name and she declined and took mine instead.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Having one name (at least in common, using hyphenation) is easier for legal reasons too. If you have kids, and one parent doesn’t share a last name with them, you’ll have headaches at school, maybe crossing a border, unless you brought some extra legal documents with, etc.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          You can choose another last name when you get married in the US too, but people just don’t choose to for the most part. The marriage license name change is a shortcut to a regular name change that can be made through the courts.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        We had a brief talk where I said I like my name and wouldn’t change it. I also said that while I prefer the tradition of her changing hers, that I understood it’s not really my choice. She did anyway

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This conversation is so white and western culture centric. Many cultures have different norms. Centering on this as the normal/accepted route is strange given how international our societies have become.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Well, it’s gender neutral, neither party can (legally) change their name after marriage. That seems weird to me. Let people do what they want.

    • ArtieShaw@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      My friends in Italy have told me that it’s not normal to change your surname after marriage. They could be messing with me, though. They’re mildly evil.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s pretty helpful for medical emergencies and getting through border police as a family.

    • 4vr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      தமிழ்
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Medical emergencies and also look up on social media.

  • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think the only correct answer will be “there are lots of different reasons”.

    My wife took my last name, even though it’s not a good one and I suggested that we pick a new one.

    Here are a couple of her reasons:

    1. She wanted us to have the same surname.

    2. She was very close friends with my cousins growing up, so the name didn’t seem weird to her.

    3. Tradition - she’d always assumed she would change her name to her husband’s name, so that seemed the most normal thing to do.