• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        To be fair, knowing Disney’s track record it probably would have been as embarrassing as the short-lived super hero duo of Snowflake and Safespace…

        or the Transgender Unicorn Powerpuff Girls episode

        or the “Quagmire’s Dad” episode of Family Guy

        or the Women’s Prison episode of “Lost Girl”

        …Look I don’t trust big name mainstream companies to touch trans voices with a 69 foot pole in a way that makes me give any reaction other than “Can you just call me a slur and be done with it? That would be less offensive at this point!”

        (Though Indie platforms are a lot better at this given things like Celeste being an entire game comparing the trans experience of coming out and transitioning to climbing a mountain and Helluva Boss’ actually having Millie’s Sister be a likable character who is openly trans but not on a soapbox nor a punching line. Implying her existence is valid and not worth mocking OR apologizing for.)

        To be even farier, choosing neutrality in times of oppression means you side with the oppressor.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I think it’s more trying to win political favor by spending big with the company owned by a member of the incoming presidential administration.

      Or it’s just wanting to market their ads on that platform and as you said, not having the balls to stick to their boycott

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        That seems to be what everyone involved with a political party or major corporation did… Make a big show of “We resisted him once, and we’ll do it again!” then go “Okay, everyone it’s time to line up and kiss Orange Man ass! Biden will you please get the ball rolling with some more of that high road crap?”

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 day ago

    wow who could have predicted this considering they’re the same companies who said they wouldn’t donate to republicans after january 6th three months before they started donating to republicans again.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    That would be REALLY Corrupt if simply buying Ads on a Website was Enough to allow you to DIRECTLY INFLUENCE the President Of The United States! Fortunately Trump DIDNT put the Owner of X in charge of Important Oversight Decisions!

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is beautiful! It’s like a textbook example for everyone paying attention to draw crisp conclusions for how the system works.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      if people haven’t caught that half the shit we read in the headlines is literally means nothing, just slop at this point, i don’t know man… just take me to the fucking farm already, put me out of my misery

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Takes sunzu2 to the farm, and hooks them up to the milking machine

        …what? I can’t kill you for meat. Nobody eats human meat. But I can milk ya!

  • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    228
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “X’s owner now has the ear of the president-elect, a man who has a long history of helping his friends, and punishing his enemies,” said Max Willens, senior analyst, at Emarketer. “Sending at least a trickle of ad spending toward X may be seen as good for business, albeit in an indirect way.”

    There’s the article in a nutshell. Give Elmo money or face the wrath of the Diaper-in-Chief.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      When Hitler needed to track the unwanted in his concentration camps, IBM was there.

      Today, Trump has selected IBM due to our experience in this field of Fascism.

      FYI: while this is not true, I’m sure most Americans will believe it.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Still, “under $2,000” for a corporation of that size is a surprisingly low amount, compared to the others. Not even worth the negative publicity. Odd choice.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ah, a history joke! Don’t forget Coke(Fanta)! Also, the history of Volkswagon is pretty interesting.

      The surprising part is, despite everything Henry Ford believed, I don’t remember ever hearing Ford being on that list.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    When have Comcast, Disney, or IBM ever have been on the wrong side of history? /s

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I have no love for big corps, but they’re likely just reading the writing on the wall. they have to deal with retribution for the next 4-12 years and they have no interest becoming the rebels. I’m kinda impressed they stepped away at all other than it probably was money spent for nothing.

      • fern@lemmy.autism.place
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        IBM supported the Nazis, and if they’re the only tech giant not fighting musk they’re going to get the kickbacks. Corps dont do “writing on the wall” anymore, they chase money, which may look similar but the goals are different.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I was going to say that’s incredibly on brand for Disney. Everything I have ever heard about Comcast seems to back up this move.

      I’m surprised about IBM though, more because I didn’t realize they were still around than anything else.

      • Zacpod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        IBM sold “inmate” counting machines to Nazi Germany. Like, sent techs there to the camps to size up the requirements and everything. It should NOT come as a surprise that they’re back on X - they’ve never had an issue with Fascism (or any other ism) as long as they had money to spend on overpriced iron.

        • PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but why would they even need a machine to count the prisoners? If they didn’t feed their victims and were planning to murder them anyways I’m having trouble understanding why they wouldn’t be okay with just a loose head count. Was it really just for counting?

          I hope I’m not coming across as insensitive, I’ve just never heard about this and it sounds so ominous.

          • Zacpod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

            Black reports that every Nazi concentration camp maintained its own Hollerith-Abteilung (Hollerith Department), assigned with keeping tabs on inmates through use of IBM’s punchcard technology.[2]: 351  In his book, Black charges that “without IBM’s machinery, continuing upkeep and service, as well as the supply of punch cards, whether located on-site or off-site, Hitler’s camps could have never managed the numbers they did.”[2]: 352